Arwed E Michael, Jana Rediker, Ulrich Knappe, Matthias M Woeltjen, Denise Schoenbeck, Jan Borggrefe, Christoph Moenninghoff
{"title":"脑膜中动脉栓塞作为治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的非手术选择:一项前瞻性匹配研究。","authors":"Arwed E Michael, Jana Rediker, Ulrich Knappe, Matthias M Woeltjen, Denise Schoenbeck, Jan Borggrefe, Christoph Moenninghoff","doi":"10.3171/2025.7.FOCUS25275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a treatment option in addition or as an alternative to conservative or surgical therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate whether MMAE can be used as a primary treatment method in patients with CSDH without an acute indication for surgery, and as a therapeutic option instead of a reoperation in cases of recurrence after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one patients with MMAE as the primary treatment method for CSDH or for cases of recurrence after surgical treatment were prospectively included. A retrospective matching with patients treated only surgically was performed using the criteria of age, gender, size and side of the CSDH, as well as anticoagulation therapy. In the follow-up, the frequency of rescue operations and complications and the resumption of anticoagulation treatment were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients with MMAE and 14 controls underwent rescue surgery due to relevant worsening of symptoms (p = 0.638). None of the patients with MMAE experienced a complication, compared with 7 of the controls (p = 0.012). When anticoagulation treatment was resumed, there was a tendency in favor of MMAE (p = 0.058).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a tendency toward superiority of MMAE for CSDH in certain patients. However, uncertainties remain regarding the exact methodology and optimal indications, and further research will be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"59 4","pages":"E9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embolization of the middle meningeal artery as a nonsurgical option for chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective matching study.\",\"authors\":\"Arwed E Michael, Jana Rediker, Ulrich Knappe, Matthias M Woeltjen, Denise Schoenbeck, Jan Borggrefe, Christoph Moenninghoff\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.7.FOCUS25275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a treatment option in addition or as an alternative to conservative or surgical therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate whether MMAE can be used as a primary treatment method in patients with CSDH without an acute indication for surgery, and as a therapeutic option instead of a reoperation in cases of recurrence after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one patients with MMAE as the primary treatment method for CSDH or for cases of recurrence after surgical treatment were prospectively included. A retrospective matching with patients treated only surgically was performed using the criteria of age, gender, size and side of the CSDH, as well as anticoagulation therapy. In the follow-up, the frequency of rescue operations and complications and the resumption of anticoagulation treatment were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients with MMAE and 14 controls underwent rescue surgery due to relevant worsening of symptoms (p = 0.638). None of the patients with MMAE experienced a complication, compared with 7 of the controls (p = 0.012). When anticoagulation treatment was resumed, there was a tendency in favor of MMAE (p = 0.058).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a tendency toward superiority of MMAE for CSDH in certain patients. However, uncertainties remain regarding the exact methodology and optimal indications, and further research will be needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"volume\":\"59 4\",\"pages\":\"E9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.7.FOCUS25275\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.7.FOCUS25275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Embolization of the middle meningeal artery as a nonsurgical option for chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective matching study.
Objective: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a treatment option in addition or as an alternative to conservative or surgical therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate whether MMAE can be used as a primary treatment method in patients with CSDH without an acute indication for surgery, and as a therapeutic option instead of a reoperation in cases of recurrence after surgery.
Methods: Fifty-one patients with MMAE as the primary treatment method for CSDH or for cases of recurrence after surgical treatment were prospectively included. A retrospective matching with patients treated only surgically was performed using the criteria of age, gender, size and side of the CSDH, as well as anticoagulation therapy. In the follow-up, the frequency of rescue operations and complications and the resumption of anticoagulation treatment were analyzed.
Results: Eleven patients with MMAE and 14 controls underwent rescue surgery due to relevant worsening of symptoms (p = 0.638). None of the patients with MMAE experienced a complication, compared with 7 of the controls (p = 0.012). When anticoagulation treatment was resumed, there was a tendency in favor of MMAE (p = 0.058).
Conclusions: There is a tendency toward superiority of MMAE for CSDH in certain patients. However, uncertainties remain regarding the exact methodology and optimal indications, and further research will be needed.