健康成人持续最大吸气压力的可重复性和最小可检测变化。

Takuya Ujikawa, Hiroki Sato, Sho Takahashi, Hiromichi Metani, Kozo Hanayama
{"title":"健康成人持续最大吸气压力的可重复性和最小可检测变化。","authors":"Takuya Ujikawa, Hiroki Sato, Sho Takahashi, Hiromichi Metani, Kozo Hanayama","doi":"10.1589/jpts.37.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] This study aimed to verify the reproducibility and minimal detectable change of sustained maximal inspiratory pressure measured using the test of incremental respiratory endurance, establishing it as an index of respiratory muscle function. [Participants and Methods] Thirty healthy young adults (mean age: 24.8 ± 2.7 years) participated. Sustained maximal inspiratory pressure was measured two or three times using the test of incremental respiratory endurance. Its relative and absolute reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimal detectable change and percentage of minimal detectable change were also calculated. [Results] The intraclass correlation coefficients for sustained maximal inspiratory pressure were 0.937 and 0.969, respectively, indicating high reliability across both re-measurement criteria. Bland-Altman analysis showed no systematic bias. Minimal detectable change values were 124.7 and 88.4 pressure time units, with corresponding percentage of minimal detectable change values of 23.8% and 16.9%, respectively. [Conclusion] Sustained maximal inspiratory pressure demonstrated high reliability and no systematic bias, suggesting its potential as a valid measure of respiratory muscle endurance. Using this measure as a reference for repeated measurements may enhance accuracy. Future research should assess its applicability in older adults and clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"37 10","pages":"502-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of sustained maximal inspiratory pressure in healthy adults.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Ujikawa, Hiroki Sato, Sho Takahashi, Hiromichi Metani, Kozo Hanayama\",\"doi\":\"10.1589/jpts.37.502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>[Purpose] This study aimed to verify the reproducibility and minimal detectable change of sustained maximal inspiratory pressure measured using the test of incremental respiratory endurance, establishing it as an index of respiratory muscle function. [Participants and Methods] Thirty healthy young adults (mean age: 24.8 ± 2.7 years) participated. Sustained maximal inspiratory pressure was measured two or three times using the test of incremental respiratory endurance. Its relative and absolute reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimal detectable change and percentage of minimal detectable change were also calculated. [Results] The intraclass correlation coefficients for sustained maximal inspiratory pressure were 0.937 and 0.969, respectively, indicating high reliability across both re-measurement criteria. Bland-Altman analysis showed no systematic bias. Minimal detectable change values were 124.7 and 88.4 pressure time units, with corresponding percentage of minimal detectable change values of 23.8% and 16.9%, respectively. [Conclusion] Sustained maximal inspiratory pressure demonstrated high reliability and no systematic bias, suggesting its potential as a valid measure of respiratory muscle endurance. Using this measure as a reference for repeated measurements may enhance accuracy. Future research should assess its applicability in older adults and clinical populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"volume\":\"37 10\",\"pages\":\"502-506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483499/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【目的】本研究旨在验证增量呼吸耐力试验测量的持续最大吸气压力的可重复性和最小可检测变化,并将其作为呼吸肌功能的指标。[对象与方法]30名健康青年,平均年龄24.8±2.7岁。使用增量呼吸耐力试验测量持续最大吸气压力2 - 3次。采用类内相关系数和Bland-Altman分析评估其相对信度和绝对信度。计算了最小可检测变化和最小可检测变化百分比。[结果]持续最大吸气压力的类内相关系数分别为0.937和0.969,表明两种重测标准具有较高的信度。Bland-Altman分析未发现系统性偏倚。最小可检测变化值为124.7和88.4压力时间单位,对应的最小可检测变化值百分比分别为23.8%和16.9%。[结论]持续最大吸气压力具有高可靠性和无系统偏差,提示其有可能作为呼吸肌肉耐力的有效测量。使用此测量作为重复测量的参考可以提高精度。未来的研究应评估其在老年人和临床人群中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of sustained maximal inspiratory pressure in healthy adults.

[Purpose] This study aimed to verify the reproducibility and minimal detectable change of sustained maximal inspiratory pressure measured using the test of incremental respiratory endurance, establishing it as an index of respiratory muscle function. [Participants and Methods] Thirty healthy young adults (mean age: 24.8 ± 2.7 years) participated. Sustained maximal inspiratory pressure was measured two or three times using the test of incremental respiratory endurance. Its relative and absolute reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimal detectable change and percentage of minimal detectable change were also calculated. [Results] The intraclass correlation coefficients for sustained maximal inspiratory pressure were 0.937 and 0.969, respectively, indicating high reliability across both re-measurement criteria. Bland-Altman analysis showed no systematic bias. Minimal detectable change values were 124.7 and 88.4 pressure time units, with corresponding percentage of minimal detectable change values of 23.8% and 16.9%, respectively. [Conclusion] Sustained maximal inspiratory pressure demonstrated high reliability and no systematic bias, suggesting its potential as a valid measure of respiratory muscle endurance. Using this measure as a reference for repeated measurements may enhance accuracy. Future research should assess its applicability in older adults and clinical populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信