脑肿瘤治疗中药物分布的评价:多侧孔和标准端孔导管对流增强输送的计算机对比研究。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ying Wang , Aili Zhang , Limei Cao , Ziyi Lou , Xinhui Si , Xuelan Zhang , Wei Wang , Jing Zhu
{"title":"脑肿瘤治疗中药物分布的评价:多侧孔和标准端孔导管对流增强输送的计算机对比研究。","authors":"Ying Wang ,&nbsp;Aili Zhang ,&nbsp;Limei Cao ,&nbsp;Ziyi Lou ,&nbsp;Xinhui Si ,&nbsp;Xuelan Zhang ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Jing Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a promising technique for treating brain tumors by enabling drugs to bypass the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The types of catheters and physicochemical properties of drugs both influence drug distribution within tumors. In this study, based on a 3D brain model reconstructed from magnetic resonance (MR) images, a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation is employed to investigate the effects of a multi-side-hole catheter (MSHC) on the CED administration of six anticancer drugs. Results indicate that reducing catheter diameter at the same infusion rate increases the effective volumes of all six drugs. When administered through the MSHC, five of the six drugs (excluding paclitaxel) show increased effective distribution volumes, while none of the drugs demonstrate higher volume-averaged concentrations. In summary, compared to the standard end-hole catheter (SEHC), the MSHC shows superior therapeutic efficacy for doxorubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and carmustine. When methotrexate is administered via MSHC, it is necessary to balance the increased distribution volume against the reduced volume-averaged concentration. Paclitaxel is more suitable for administration in the SEHC, especially with a low infusion rate and a small-diameter catheter. These findings can provide recommendations for the clinical implementation of CED.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14187,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutics","volume":"685 ","pages":"Article 126230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of drug distributions in brain tumor therapy: An in silico comparative study of multi-side-hole and standard end-hole catheters in convection-enhanced delivery\",\"authors\":\"Ying Wang ,&nbsp;Aili Zhang ,&nbsp;Limei Cao ,&nbsp;Ziyi Lou ,&nbsp;Xinhui Si ,&nbsp;Xuelan Zhang ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Jing Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a promising technique for treating brain tumors by enabling drugs to bypass the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The types of catheters and physicochemical properties of drugs both influence drug distribution within tumors. In this study, based on a 3D brain model reconstructed from magnetic resonance (MR) images, a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation is employed to investigate the effects of a multi-side-hole catheter (MSHC) on the CED administration of six anticancer drugs. Results indicate that reducing catheter diameter at the same infusion rate increases the effective volumes of all six drugs. When administered through the MSHC, five of the six drugs (excluding paclitaxel) show increased effective distribution volumes, while none of the drugs demonstrate higher volume-averaged concentrations. In summary, compared to the standard end-hole catheter (SEHC), the MSHC shows superior therapeutic efficacy for doxorubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and carmustine. When methotrexate is administered via MSHC, it is necessary to balance the increased distribution volume against the reduced volume-averaged concentration. Paclitaxel is more suitable for administration in the SEHC, especially with a low infusion rate and a small-diameter catheter. These findings can provide recommendations for the clinical implementation of CED.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutics\",\"volume\":\"685 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517325010671\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517325010671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对流增强输送(CED)是一种很有前途的治疗脑肿瘤的技术,它使药物能够绕过血脑屏障(BBB)。导管的类型和药物的理化性质都会影响药物在肿瘤内的分布。在本研究中,基于磁共振(MR)图像重建的三维脑模型,采用计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟研究了多侧孔导管(MSHC)对6种抗癌药物的CED给药的影响。结果表明,在相同输注速率下,减小导管直径可使6种药物的有效容积增加。当通过MSHC给药时,六种药物中的五种(不包括紫杉醇)显示有效分布体积增加,而没有一种药物显示更高的体积平均浓度。综上所述,与标准端孔导管(SEHC)相比,MSHC对阿霉素、顺铂、氟尿嘧啶和卡莫司定的治疗效果更佳。当甲氨蝶呤通过MSHC给药时,有必要平衡增加的分布体积和减少的体积平均浓度。紫杉醇更适合于SEHC的给药,特别是在低输注速率和小直径导管的情况下。这些发现可以为临床实施CED提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of drug distributions in brain tumor therapy: An in silico comparative study of multi-side-hole and standard end-hole catheters in convection-enhanced delivery

Evaluation of drug distributions in brain tumor therapy: An in silico comparative study of multi-side-hole and standard end-hole catheters in convection-enhanced delivery
Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a promising technique for treating brain tumors by enabling drugs to bypass the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The types of catheters and physicochemical properties of drugs both influence drug distribution within tumors. In this study, based on a 3D brain model reconstructed from magnetic resonance (MR) images, a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation is employed to investigate the effects of a multi-side-hole catheter (MSHC) on the CED administration of six anticancer drugs. Results indicate that reducing catheter diameter at the same infusion rate increases the effective volumes of all six drugs. When administered through the MSHC, five of the six drugs (excluding paclitaxel) show increased effective distribution volumes, while none of the drugs demonstrate higher volume-averaged concentrations. In summary, compared to the standard end-hole catheter (SEHC), the MSHC shows superior therapeutic efficacy for doxorubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and carmustine. When methotrexate is administered via MSHC, it is necessary to balance the increased distribution volume against the reduced volume-averaged concentration. Paclitaxel is more suitable for administration in the SEHC, especially with a low infusion rate and a small-diameter catheter. These findings can provide recommendations for the clinical implementation of CED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
951
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmaceutics is the third most cited journal in the "Pharmacy & Pharmacology" category out of 366 journals, being the true home for pharmaceutical scientists concerned with the physical, chemical and biological properties of devices and delivery systems for drugs, vaccines and biologicals, including their design, manufacture and evaluation. This includes evaluation of the properties of drugs, excipients such as surfactants and polymers and novel materials. The journal has special sections on pharmaceutical nanotechnology and personalized medicines, and publishes research papers, reviews, commentaries and letters to the editor as well as special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信