ramelteon使用与跌倒和骨折相关:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Rintaro Sogawa , Yuki Nakano , Kazumasa Kotake , Hiroshi Tateishi , Yoshito Mizoguchi , Akira Monji , Chisato Shimanoe
{"title":"ramelteon使用与跌倒和骨折相关:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rintaro Sogawa ,&nbsp;Yuki Nakano ,&nbsp;Kazumasa Kotake ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Tateishi ,&nbsp;Yoshito Mizoguchi ,&nbsp;Akira Monji ,&nbsp;Chisato Shimanoe","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hypnotics are associated with increased risk of falls and fractures. However, most studies evaluating the association between ramelteon, and these outcomes, are single-center and lack comprehensive analysis. We aimed to evaluate the association between ramelteon use and the risk of falls and fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched for the term “ramelteon” in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online via PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. in January 7, 2025. Retrieved studies were assessed for risk of bias and analyzed for the association between ramelteon use and falls or fractures using a random-effects model based on the Sidik–Jonkman method, as well as inter-study heterogeneity using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Meta-analyses were conducted on seven observational studies and three randomized controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ramelteon use was not significantly associated with an increased fall risk (odds ratio: 1.26; 95 % confidence interval: 0.83–1.92; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). Analysis of fractures showed a potential increased risk with ramelteon use (risk ratio: 3.29; 95 % confidence interval: 0.53–20.45; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %), although this was not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ramelteon was not associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of falls or fractures, regardless of the study design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"97 ","pages":"Pages 72-78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Falls and fractures associated with ramelteon use: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Rintaro Sogawa ,&nbsp;Yuki Nakano ,&nbsp;Kazumasa Kotake ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Tateishi ,&nbsp;Yoshito Mizoguchi ,&nbsp;Akira Monji ,&nbsp;Chisato Shimanoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hypnotics are associated with increased risk of falls and fractures. However, most studies evaluating the association between ramelteon, and these outcomes, are single-center and lack comprehensive analysis. We aimed to evaluate the association between ramelteon use and the risk of falls and fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched for the term “ramelteon” in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online via PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. in January 7, 2025. Retrieved studies were assessed for risk of bias and analyzed for the association between ramelteon use and falls or fractures using a random-effects model based on the Sidik–Jonkman method, as well as inter-study heterogeneity using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Meta-analyses were conducted on seven observational studies and three randomized controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ramelteon use was not significantly associated with an increased fall risk (odds ratio: 1.26; 95 % confidence interval: 0.83–1.92; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). Analysis of fractures showed a potential increased risk with ramelteon use (risk ratio: 3.29; 95 % confidence interval: 0.53–20.45; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %), although this was not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ramelteon was not associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of falls or fractures, regardless of the study design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General hospital psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001884\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001884","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

催眠药与跌倒和骨折的风险增加有关。然而,大多数评估ramelteon与这些结果之间关系的研究都是单中心的,缺乏全面的分析。我们的目的是评估ramelteon使用与跌倒和骨折风险之间的关系。方法:我们通过PubMed、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、国际临床试验注册平台和ClinicalTrials.gov,系统地在医学文献分析和在线检索系统中检索“ramelteon”一词。2025年1月7日。采用基于Sidik-Jonkman方法的随机效应模型,对检索到的研究进行偏倚风险评估,分析ramelteon使用与跌倒或骨折之间的关系,并使用I2统计量分析研究间异质性。对7项观察性研究和3项随机对照试验进行meta分析。结果:Ramelteon的使用与跌倒风险的增加没有显著相关(优势比:1.26;95%可信区间:0.83-1.92;I2 = 0%)。骨折分析显示ramelteon使用的潜在风险增加(风险比:3.29;95%可信区间:0.53-20.45;I2 = 0%),尽管这没有统计学意义。结论:无论研究设计如何,Ramelteon与跌倒或骨折风险的统计学显著增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Falls and fractures associated with ramelteon use: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Hypnotics are associated with increased risk of falls and fractures. However, most studies evaluating the association between ramelteon, and these outcomes, are single-center and lack comprehensive analysis. We aimed to evaluate the association between ramelteon use and the risk of falls and fractures.

Methods

We systematically searched for the term “ramelteon” in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online via PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. in January 7, 2025. Retrieved studies were assessed for risk of bias and analyzed for the association between ramelteon use and falls or fractures using a random-effects model based on the Sidik–Jonkman method, as well as inter-study heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. Meta-analyses were conducted on seven observational studies and three randomized controlled trials.

Results

Ramelteon use was not significantly associated with an increased fall risk (odds ratio: 1.26; 95 % confidence interval: 0.83–1.92; I2 = 0 %). Analysis of fractures showed a potential increased risk with ramelteon use (risk ratio: 3.29; 95 % confidence interval: 0.53–20.45; I2 = 0 %), although this was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Ramelteon was not associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of falls or fractures, regardless of the study design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信