双侧力量不对称膝关节伸展:科学和实际应用的可靠性和一致性分析。

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1635685
Manfred Zöger, Alfred Nimmerichter, Arnold Baca, Klaus Wirth
{"title":"双侧力量不对称膝关节伸展:科学和实际应用的可靠性和一致性分析。","authors":"Manfred Zöger, Alfred Nimmerichter, Arnold Baca, Klaus Wirth","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1635685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscular strength imbalances are associated with musculoskeletal injuries and performance deficits. This study aimed to assess the reliability and consistency of bilateral strength asymmetry (BSA) in quadriceps muscles as determined by dynamometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine physically active participants underwent a familiarization and two test sessions, assessing isometric (100°, 140° knee angles) and isokinetic (30° s<sup>-1</sup>, 400° s<sup>-1</sup>) knee extension. BSA was calculated from Peak torque (PT), and reliability was evaluated using paired <i>t</i>-test, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and Kappa coefficients for limb dominance consistency. Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in mean PT or BSA were found between sessions. However, considerable individual variability was observed, with 21%-38% of participants showing between session limb dominance reversals. ICC values ranged from 0.33 to 0.70 (poor to moderate reliability), SEM from 5.0% to 8.3%, and MDC from 13.9% to 22.9%. Kappa coefficients indicated less than chance to moderate agreement for limb dominance between sessions (0.19-0.59) and within sessions (-0.05-0.50). Bland-Altman analyses revealed small bias but wide limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BSA measurements demonstrated low reliability and inconsistency, with significant individual variability and frequent limb dominance reversals. These findings raise concerns about the use of fixed asymmetry thresholds for injury risk assessment. Task-specificity and individual motor control variations may contribute to these inconsistencies. Future studies should consider habituation and standardized training protocols before evaluating BSA reliability. The results emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of BSA data and highlight limitations in its direct clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1635685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilateral strength asymmetry in knee extension: a reliability and consistency analysis for scientific and practical applications.\",\"authors\":\"Manfred Zöger, Alfred Nimmerichter, Arnold Baca, Klaus Wirth\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fspor.2025.1635685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muscular strength imbalances are associated with musculoskeletal injuries and performance deficits. This study aimed to assess the reliability and consistency of bilateral strength asymmetry (BSA) in quadriceps muscles as determined by dynamometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine physically active participants underwent a familiarization and two test sessions, assessing isometric (100°, 140° knee angles) and isokinetic (30° s<sup>-1</sup>, 400° s<sup>-1</sup>) knee extension. BSA was calculated from Peak torque (PT), and reliability was evaluated using paired <i>t</i>-test, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and Kappa coefficients for limb dominance consistency. Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in mean PT or BSA were found between sessions. However, considerable individual variability was observed, with 21%-38% of participants showing between session limb dominance reversals. ICC values ranged from 0.33 to 0.70 (poor to moderate reliability), SEM from 5.0% to 8.3%, and MDC from 13.9% to 22.9%. Kappa coefficients indicated less than chance to moderate agreement for limb dominance between sessions (0.19-0.59) and within sessions (-0.05-0.50). Bland-Altman analyses revealed small bias but wide limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BSA measurements demonstrated low reliability and inconsistency, with significant individual variability and frequent limb dominance reversals. These findings raise concerns about the use of fixed asymmetry thresholds for injury risk assessment. Task-specificity and individual motor control variations may contribute to these inconsistencies. Future studies should consider habituation and standardized training protocols before evaluating BSA reliability. The results emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of BSA data and highlight limitations in its direct clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1635685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1635685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1635685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌肉力量失衡与肌肉骨骼损伤和运动能力缺陷有关。本研究旨在通过动力测量法评估股四头肌双侧力量不对称(BSA)的可靠性和一致性。方法:29名身体活跃的参与者进行了熟悉和两个测试阶段,评估等速(100°,140°膝关节角)和等速(30°s- 1400°s-1)膝关节伸展。根据峰值扭矩(PT)计算BSA,并使用配对t检验、类内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和Kappa系数对肢体优势一致性进行可靠性评估。布兰德-奥特曼地块评估了会议之间的一致性。结果:两组间平均PT和BSA无显著差异。然而,观察到相当大的个体差异,21%-38%的参与者在两次会议之间表现出肢体优势逆转。ICC值从0.33到0.70(差到中等信度),SEM从5.0%到8.3%,MDC从13.9%到22.9%。Kappa系数表明,在会话之间(0.19-0.59)和会话内(-0.05-0.50),肢体优势的一致性低于中度一致性。布兰德-奥特曼分析显示,偏差很小,但一致的范围很广。结论:BSA测量的可靠性和不一致性较低,具有显著的个体差异和频繁的肢体优势逆转。这些发现引起了对使用固定不对称阈值进行损伤风险评估的关注。任务特异性和个体运动控制的变化可能导致这些不一致。未来的研究应该在评估BSA可靠性之前考虑习惯化和标准化训练方案。结果强调了谨慎解释BSA数据的必要性,并强调了其直接临床应用的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bilateral strength asymmetry in knee extension: a reliability and consistency analysis for scientific and practical applications.

Background: Muscular strength imbalances are associated with musculoskeletal injuries and performance deficits. This study aimed to assess the reliability and consistency of bilateral strength asymmetry (BSA) in quadriceps muscles as determined by dynamometry.

Methods: Twenty-nine physically active participants underwent a familiarization and two test sessions, assessing isometric (100°, 140° knee angles) and isokinetic (30° s-1, 400° s-1) knee extension. BSA was calculated from Peak torque (PT), and reliability was evaluated using paired t-test, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and Kappa coefficients for limb dominance consistency. Bland-Altman plots assessed agreement between sessions.

Results: No significant differences in mean PT or BSA were found between sessions. However, considerable individual variability was observed, with 21%-38% of participants showing between session limb dominance reversals. ICC values ranged from 0.33 to 0.70 (poor to moderate reliability), SEM from 5.0% to 8.3%, and MDC from 13.9% to 22.9%. Kappa coefficients indicated less than chance to moderate agreement for limb dominance between sessions (0.19-0.59) and within sessions (-0.05-0.50). Bland-Altman analyses revealed small bias but wide limits of agreement.

Conclusions: BSA measurements demonstrated low reliability and inconsistency, with significant individual variability and frequent limb dominance reversals. These findings raise concerns about the use of fixed asymmetry thresholds for injury risk assessment. Task-specificity and individual motor control variations may contribute to these inconsistencies. Future studies should consider habituation and standardized training protocols before evaluating BSA reliability. The results emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of BSA data and highlight limitations in its direct clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信