Liu Xin, Xiaodan Jiao, Xiaowei Gong, Jing Yu, Jing Zhao, Jing Lv, Qixuan Feng, YaDong Yuan, Wensen Pan
{"title":"支气管肺泡灌洗液新一代宏基因组测序对肺炎免疫功能低下患者的诊断价值。","authors":"Liu Xin, Xiaodan Jiao, Xiaowei Gong, Jing Yu, Jing Zhao, Jing Lv, Qixuan Feng, YaDong Yuan, Wensen Pan","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2025.1602636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) enables simultaneous sequencing of DNA fragments for comprehensive pathogen identification. Pneumonia in immunocompromised patients-characterized by atypical clinical manifestations and rapid progression-poses diagnostic challenges. Conventional microbiological testing (CMT), which relies on pathogen culture and serological assays, is limited by prolonged turnaround times and suboptimal detection rates. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of mNGS through comparative analysis with CMT in detecting pathogens among immunocompromised patients with pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 146 immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. The mNGS and CMT results were systematically analyzed. Pathogen detection rates and microbial spectrum concordance were visualized using pie and bar charts. Diagnostic performance was compared using McNemar's test and Kappa (κ) statistics for inter-method agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve were calculated for pathogen-specific evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>mNGS demonstrated superior detection efficacy, identifying pathogens in 98 cases versus 50 by CMT, with 48 overlapping positives. The microbial spectrum showed substantial differences: mNGS detected 73 bacterial, 46 fungal, and 45 viral pathogens, whereas CMT identified 38 bacterial, 27 fungal, and 21 viral agents. mNGS outperformed CMT across all infection types, including single-pathogen infections (bacterial, fungal, or viral only) and mixed infections (bacterial + fungal, bacterial + viral, fungal + viral, or bacterial + fungal + viral). Bacterial and fungal detections showed low inter-method concordance, while viral detection exhibited moderate agreement (κ = 0.510, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Notably, mNGS achieved significantly higher detection rates for <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Pneumocystis jirovecii</i> in intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted patients with severe pneumonia (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Clinical outcomes improved in 45 patients following mNGS-guided therapeutic adjustments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mNGS and CMT demonstrate complementary strengths in bacterial and fungal detection in immunocompromised patients with pneumonia. mNGS provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy for key pathogens such as <i>E. faecalis</i> and <i>P. jirovecii</i>, particularly in severe and ICU-admitted cases. As a high-throughput diagnostic tool, mNGS may improve pathogen detection and clinical management in immunocompromised populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12458,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1602636"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of metagenomic next generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in immunocompromised patients with pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Liu Xin, Xiaodan Jiao, Xiaowei Gong, Jing Yu, Jing Zhao, Jing Lv, Qixuan Feng, YaDong Yuan, Wensen Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcimb.2025.1602636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) enables simultaneous sequencing of DNA fragments for comprehensive pathogen identification. Pneumonia in immunocompromised patients-characterized by atypical clinical manifestations and rapid progression-poses diagnostic challenges. Conventional microbiological testing (CMT), which relies on pathogen culture and serological assays, is limited by prolonged turnaround times and suboptimal detection rates. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of mNGS through comparative analysis with CMT in detecting pathogens among immunocompromised patients with pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 146 immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. The mNGS and CMT results were systematically analyzed. Pathogen detection rates and microbial spectrum concordance were visualized using pie and bar charts. Diagnostic performance was compared using McNemar's test and Kappa (κ) statistics for inter-method agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve were calculated for pathogen-specific evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>mNGS demonstrated superior detection efficacy, identifying pathogens in 98 cases versus 50 by CMT, with 48 overlapping positives. The microbial spectrum showed substantial differences: mNGS detected 73 bacterial, 46 fungal, and 45 viral pathogens, whereas CMT identified 38 bacterial, 27 fungal, and 21 viral agents. mNGS outperformed CMT across all infection types, including single-pathogen infections (bacterial, fungal, or viral only) and mixed infections (bacterial + fungal, bacterial + viral, fungal + viral, or bacterial + fungal + viral). Bacterial and fungal detections showed low inter-method concordance, while viral detection exhibited moderate agreement (κ = 0.510, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Notably, mNGS achieved significantly higher detection rates for <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and <i>Pneumocystis jirovecii</i> in intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted patients with severe pneumonia (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Clinical outcomes improved in 45 patients following mNGS-guided therapeutic adjustments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mNGS and CMT demonstrate complementary strengths in bacterial and fungal detection in immunocompromised patients with pneumonia. mNGS provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy for key pathogens such as <i>E. faecalis</i> and <i>P. jirovecii</i>, particularly in severe and ICU-admitted cases. As a high-throughput diagnostic tool, mNGS may improve pathogen detection and clinical management in immunocompromised populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1602636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1602636\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1602636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新一代宏基因组测序(mNGS)能够同时测序DNA片段,用于全面的病原体鉴定。免疫功能低下患者的肺炎具有非典型临床表现和快速进展的特点,这给诊断带来了挑战。传统的微生物检测(CMT)依赖于病原体培养和血清学分析,由于周转时间长和检测率不理想而受到限制。本研究通过对比分析mNGS与CMT在肺炎免疫功能低下患者中检测病原体的临床应用价值。方法:我们对146例疑似肺炎的免疫功能低下患者进行了回顾性队列研究。对mNGS和CMT结果进行系统分析。采用饼状图和柱状图可视化病原菌检出率和微生物光谱一致性。采用McNemar检验和Kappa (κ)统计比较方法间的一致性。计算病原菌特异性评价的敏感性、特异性、准确性和曲线下面积。结果:mNGS的检测效果优于CMT的50例,鉴定出98例,其中48例重叠阳性。微生物谱显示出明显的差异:mNGS检测到73种细菌、46种真菌和45种病毒病原体,而CMT检测到38种细菌、27种真菌和21种病毒病原体。mNGS在所有感染类型中都优于CMT,包括单病原体感染(细菌、真菌或病毒)和混合感染(细菌+真菌、细菌+病毒、真菌+病毒或细菌+真菌+病毒)。细菌和真菌检测的方法间一致性较低,而病毒检测的方法间一致性中等(κ = 0.510, p < 0.001)。值得注意的是,mNGS对重症监护病房(ICU)重症肺炎患者粪肠球菌和乙氏肺囊虫的检出率明显高于对照组(p < 0.05)。在mngs引导下进行治疗调整后,45例患者的临床结果得到改善。结论:mNGS和CMT在肺炎免疫功能低下患者的细菌和真菌检测中具有互补优势。mNGS可提高对粪肠杆菌和耶氏疟原虫等关键病原体的诊断准确性,特别是在重症病例和icu住院病例中。作为一种高通量的诊断工具,mNGS可以改善免疫功能低下人群的病原体检测和临床管理。
Diagnostic value of metagenomic next generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in immunocompromised patients with pneumonia.
Background: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) enables simultaneous sequencing of DNA fragments for comprehensive pathogen identification. Pneumonia in immunocompromised patients-characterized by atypical clinical manifestations and rapid progression-poses diagnostic challenges. Conventional microbiological testing (CMT), which relies on pathogen culture and serological assays, is limited by prolonged turnaround times and suboptimal detection rates. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of mNGS through comparative analysis with CMT in detecting pathogens among immunocompromised patients with pneumonia.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 146 immunocompromised patients with suspected pneumonia. The mNGS and CMT results were systematically analyzed. Pathogen detection rates and microbial spectrum concordance were visualized using pie and bar charts. Diagnostic performance was compared using McNemar's test and Kappa (κ) statistics for inter-method agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve were calculated for pathogen-specific evaluations.
Results: mNGS demonstrated superior detection efficacy, identifying pathogens in 98 cases versus 50 by CMT, with 48 overlapping positives. The microbial spectrum showed substantial differences: mNGS detected 73 bacterial, 46 fungal, and 45 viral pathogens, whereas CMT identified 38 bacterial, 27 fungal, and 21 viral agents. mNGS outperformed CMT across all infection types, including single-pathogen infections (bacterial, fungal, or viral only) and mixed infections (bacterial + fungal, bacterial + viral, fungal + viral, or bacterial + fungal + viral). Bacterial and fungal detections showed low inter-method concordance, while viral detection exhibited moderate agreement (κ = 0.510, p < 0.001). Notably, mNGS achieved significantly higher detection rates for Enterococcus faecalis and Pneumocystis jirovecii in intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted patients with severe pneumonia (p < 0.05). Clinical outcomes improved in 45 patients following mNGS-guided therapeutic adjustments.
Conclusions: mNGS and CMT demonstrate complementary strengths in bacterial and fungal detection in immunocompromised patients with pneumonia. mNGS provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy for key pathogens such as E. faecalis and P. jirovecii, particularly in severe and ICU-admitted cases. As a high-throughput diagnostic tool, mNGS may improve pathogen detection and clinical management in immunocompromised populations.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology is a leading specialty journal, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across all pathogenic microorganisms and their interaction with their hosts. Chief Editor Yousef Abu Kwaik, University of Louisville is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology includes research on bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses, endosymbionts, prions and all microbial pathogens as well as the microbiota and its effect on health and disease in various hosts. The research approaches include molecular microbiology, cellular microbiology, gene regulation, proteomics, signal transduction, pathogenic evolution, genomics, structural biology, and virulence factors as well as model hosts. Areas of research to counteract infectious agents by the host include the host innate and adaptive immune responses as well as metabolic restrictions to various pathogenic microorganisms, vaccine design and development against various pathogenic microorganisms, and the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and its countermeasures.