{"title":"免疫性血小板减少症的新疗法:不断发展的治疗前景。","authors":"Kun Huang","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2570332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune-bleeding disorder; its management is shifting from empiricimmunosuppression and splenectomy to targeted, pathway-specific drugs that raise platelet counts with fewer long-term toxicities.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review critically appraises evidence behind six mechanistic drug classes poised to reshape ITP care: thrombopoietin receptor agonists, spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, reversible Brutontyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal Fc-receptor antagonists, proximal complementblockers, and plasma-cell or BAFF-directed therapies. We interrogated PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hematology-conference abstracts (January 2010-May2025), retrieving synthesizing phase 2-3 trials and key observational studies. Throughout, we contrast these agents with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab, highlighting shared immunomodulatory nodes and unique points of divergence that may inform rational sequencing or combination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Mechanism-focused agents already enable steroid-sparing outpatient regimens and personalized care, yet durable remission and predictive biomarkers remain elusive. FcRn and reversible BTK inhibitors are closest to regulatory approval; complement blockade delivers24-hour platelet rescue, while plasma-cell or BAFF inhibition may consolidate sustained disease control. Research priorities include biomarker-guided pathway selection, optimal positioning with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, long-termpharmacovigilance, and cost-effectiveness analyses to ensure equitable global access.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel therapeutics for immune thrombocytopenia: an evolving treatment landscape.\",\"authors\":\"Kun Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17474086.2025.2570332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune-bleeding disorder; its management is shifting from empiricimmunosuppression and splenectomy to targeted, pathway-specific drugs that raise platelet counts with fewer long-term toxicities.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review critically appraises evidence behind six mechanistic drug classes poised to reshape ITP care: thrombopoietin receptor agonists, spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, reversible Brutontyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal Fc-receptor antagonists, proximal complementblockers, and plasma-cell or BAFF-directed therapies. We interrogated PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hematology-conference abstracts (January 2010-May2025), retrieving synthesizing phase 2-3 trials and key observational studies. Throughout, we contrast these agents with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab, highlighting shared immunomodulatory nodes and unique points of divergence that may inform rational sequencing or combination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Mechanism-focused agents already enable steroid-sparing outpatient regimens and personalized care, yet durable remission and predictive biomarkers remain elusive. FcRn and reversible BTK inhibitors are closest to regulatory approval; complement blockade delivers24-hour platelet rescue, while plasma-cell or BAFF inhibition may consolidate sustained disease control. Research priorities include biomarker-guided pathway selection, optimal positioning with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, long-termpharmacovigilance, and cost-effectiveness analyses to ensure equitable global access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2570332\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2570332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novel therapeutics for immune thrombocytopenia: an evolving treatment landscape.
Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune-bleeding disorder; its management is shifting from empiricimmunosuppression and splenectomy to targeted, pathway-specific drugs that raise platelet counts with fewer long-term toxicities.
Areas covered: This review critically appraises evidence behind six mechanistic drug classes poised to reshape ITP care: thrombopoietin receptor agonists, spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, reversible Brutontyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal Fc-receptor antagonists, proximal complementblockers, and plasma-cell or BAFF-directed therapies. We interrogated PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hematology-conference abstracts (January 2010-May2025), retrieving synthesizing phase 2-3 trials and key observational studies. Throughout, we contrast these agents with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab, highlighting shared immunomodulatory nodes and unique points of divergence that may inform rational sequencing or combination.
Expert opinion: Mechanism-focused agents already enable steroid-sparing outpatient regimens and personalized care, yet durable remission and predictive biomarkers remain elusive. FcRn and reversible BTK inhibitors are closest to regulatory approval; complement blockade delivers24-hour platelet rescue, while plasma-cell or BAFF inhibition may consolidate sustained disease control. Research priorities include biomarker-guided pathway selection, optimal positioning with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, long-termpharmacovigilance, and cost-effectiveness analyses to ensure equitable global access.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.