免疫性血小板减少症的新疗法:不断发展的治疗前景。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Kun Huang
{"title":"免疫性血小板减少症的新疗法:不断发展的治疗前景。","authors":"Kun Huang","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2570332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune-bleeding disorder; its management is shifting from empiricimmunosuppression and splenectomy to targeted, pathway-specific drugs that raise platelet counts with fewer long-term toxicities.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review critically appraises evidence behind six mechanistic drug classes poised to reshape ITP care: thrombopoietin receptor agonists, spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, reversible Brutontyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal Fc-receptor antagonists, proximal complementblockers, and plasma-cell or BAFF-directed therapies. We interrogated PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hematology-conference abstracts (January 2010-May2025), retrieving synthesizing phase 2-3 trials and key observational studies. Throughout, we contrast these agents with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab, highlighting shared immunomodulatory nodes and unique points of divergence that may inform rational sequencing or combination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Mechanism-focused agents already enable steroid-sparing outpatient regimens and personalized care, yet durable remission and predictive biomarkers remain elusive. FcRn and reversible BTK inhibitors are closest to regulatory approval; complement blockade delivers24-hour platelet rescue, while plasma-cell or BAFF inhibition may consolidate sustained disease control. Research priorities include biomarker-guided pathway selection, optimal positioning with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, long-termpharmacovigilance, and cost-effectiveness analyses to ensure equitable global access.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel therapeutics for immune thrombocytopenia: an evolving treatment landscape.\",\"authors\":\"Kun Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17474086.2025.2570332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune-bleeding disorder; its management is shifting from empiricimmunosuppression and splenectomy to targeted, pathway-specific drugs that raise platelet counts with fewer long-term toxicities.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review critically appraises evidence behind six mechanistic drug classes poised to reshape ITP care: thrombopoietin receptor agonists, spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, reversible Brutontyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal Fc-receptor antagonists, proximal complementblockers, and plasma-cell or BAFF-directed therapies. We interrogated PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hematology-conference abstracts (January 2010-May2025), retrieving synthesizing phase 2-3 trials and key observational studies. Throughout, we contrast these agents with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab, highlighting shared immunomodulatory nodes and unique points of divergence that may inform rational sequencing or combination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Mechanism-focused agents already enable steroid-sparing outpatient regimens and personalized care, yet durable remission and predictive biomarkers remain elusive. FcRn and reversible BTK inhibitors are closest to regulatory approval; complement blockade delivers24-hour platelet rescue, while plasma-cell or BAFF inhibition may consolidate sustained disease control. Research priorities include biomarker-guided pathway selection, optimal positioning with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, long-termpharmacovigilance, and cost-effectiveness analyses to ensure equitable global access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2570332\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2570332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)是一种自身免疫性出血性疾病;其治疗方法正从经验性免疫抑制和脾切除术转向靶向性、途径特异性药物,这些药物可提高血小板计数,且长期毒性较小。涵盖的领域:本综述批判性地评估了六种有望重塑ITP护理的机制药物类别的证据:血小板生成素受体激动剂、脾酪氨酸激酶抑制剂、可逆酪氨酸激酶抑制剂、新生儿fc受体拮抗剂、近端互补阻滞剂和浆细胞或bba定向治疗。我们查阅了PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov和血液学会议摘要(2010年1月- 2025年5月),检索了2-3期合成试验和关键观察性研究。总之,我们将这些药物与类固醇、静脉注射免疫球蛋白和利妥昔单抗进行了对比,强调了共同的免疫调节节点和独特的差异点,这可能会为合理的测序或组合提供信息。专家意见:以机制为中心的药物已经使类固醇节省的门诊方案和个性化护理成为可能,但持久的缓解和预测性生物标志物仍然难以捉摸。FcRn和可逆btk抑制剂最接近监管批准;补体阻断提供24小时血小板拯救,而浆细胞或BAFF抑制可能巩固持续的疾病控制。研究重点包括生物标志物引导的途径选择、血小板生成素受体激动剂的最佳定位、长期药物警戒和成本效益分析,以确保公平的全球可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel therapeutics for immune thrombocytopenia: an evolving treatment landscape.

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune-bleeding disorder; its management is shifting from empiricimmunosuppression and splenectomy to targeted, pathway-specific drugs that raise platelet counts with fewer long-term toxicities.

Areas covered: This review critically appraises evidence behind six mechanistic drug classes poised to reshape ITP care: thrombopoietin receptor agonists, spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors, reversible Brutontyrosine kinase inhibitors, neonatal Fc-receptor antagonists, proximal complementblockers, and plasma-cell or BAFF-directed therapies. We interrogated PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and hematology-conference abstracts (January 2010-May2025), retrieving synthesizing phase 2-3 trials and key observational studies. Throughout, we contrast these agents with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab, highlighting shared immunomodulatory nodes and unique points of divergence that may inform rational sequencing or combination.

Expert opinion: Mechanism-focused agents already enable steroid-sparing outpatient regimens and personalized care, yet durable remission and predictive biomarkers remain elusive. FcRn and reversible BTK inhibitors are closest to regulatory approval; complement blockade delivers24-hour platelet rescue, while plasma-cell or BAFF inhibition may consolidate sustained disease control. Research priorities include biomarker-guided pathway selection, optimal positioning with thrombopoietin receptor agonists, long-termpharmacovigilance, and cost-effectiveness analyses to ensure equitable global access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信