伊朗行人交通碰撞影响因素:定性内容分析

Leila Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati, Ali Asgary, Enayatollah Homaie Rad, Jon Mark Hirshon, Abbas Ostadtaghizadeh
{"title":"伊朗行人交通碰撞影响因素:定性内容分析","authors":"Leila Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati, Ali Asgary, Enayatollah Homaie Rad, Jon Mark Hirshon, Abbas Ostadtaghizadeh","doi":"10.30476/beat.2025.105939.1577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore experts' perspectives on the factors influencing pedestrian traffic collisions in Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted using conventional content analysis with an inductive approach from September 2023 to March 2024. Twenty-six experts were purposefully selected from across Iran. Data were collected through individual face-to-face interviews, guided by a semi-structured interview, developed by a panel of experts and contained open-ended questions. Data analysis was performed manually using the Graneheim and Lundman approach (2004). To ensure trustworthiness, four strategies proposed by Lincoln and Guba were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed two main categories: direct factors and underlying factors, comprising nine subcategories. Direct factors included five subcategories: driver, pedestrian, roads and streets, vehicle, and geographic factors. Underlying factors included four subcategories: governance factors, social determinants, cultural conditions, and economic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified key risk factors associated with pedestrian collisions according to experts' experiences. We recommend further qualitative studies to explore high-risk behaviors among pedestrians and drivers in depth. Additionally, systematic reviews should examine strategies employed by developing and successful countries to prevent or reduce pedestrian collisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"13 3","pages":"165-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Pedestrian Traffic Collision in Iran: A Qualitative Content Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Leila Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati, Ali Asgary, Enayatollah Homaie Rad, Jon Mark Hirshon, Abbas Ostadtaghizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/beat.2025.105939.1577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore experts' perspectives on the factors influencing pedestrian traffic collisions in Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted using conventional content analysis with an inductive approach from September 2023 to March 2024. Twenty-six experts were purposefully selected from across Iran. Data were collected through individual face-to-face interviews, guided by a semi-structured interview, developed by a panel of experts and contained open-ended questions. Data analysis was performed manually using the Graneheim and Lundman approach (2004). To ensure trustworthiness, four strategies proposed by Lincoln and Guba were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed two main categories: direct factors and underlying factors, comprising nine subcategories. Direct factors included five subcategories: driver, pedestrian, roads and streets, vehicle, and geographic factors. Underlying factors included four subcategories: governance factors, social determinants, cultural conditions, and economic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identified key risk factors associated with pedestrian collisions according to experts' experiences. We recommend further qualitative studies to explore high-risk behaviors among pedestrians and drivers in depth. Additionally, systematic reviews should examine strategies employed by developing and successful countries to prevent or reduce pedestrian collisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"165-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/beat.2025.105939.1577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/beat.2025.105939.1577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨专家对伊朗行人交通碰撞影响因素的观点。方法:本研究于2023年9月至2024年3月采用传统的内容分析和归纳法进行定性研究。有目的地从伊朗各地挑选了26名专家。数据是通过面对面的个人访谈收集的,在半结构化访谈的指导下,由专家小组制定,并包含开放式问题。数据分析使用Graneheim和Lundman方法(2004年)手动执行。为了保证可信度,采用了林肯和古巴提出的四种策略。结果:结果揭示了直接因素和潜在因素两大类,共分为九个子类。直接因素包括五个子类:驾驶员、行人、道路和街道、车辆和地理因素。潜在因素包括四个子类别:治理因素、社会决定因素、文化条件和经济状况。结论:根据专家的经验,研究确定了与行人碰撞相关的关键危险因素。我们建议进一步进行定性研究,深入探讨行人和司机的高危行为。此外,系统审查应审查发展中国家和成功国家为防止或减少行人碰撞而采用的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing Pedestrian Traffic Collision in Iran: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore experts' perspectives on the factors influencing pedestrian traffic collisions in Iran.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using conventional content analysis with an inductive approach from September 2023 to March 2024. Twenty-six experts were purposefully selected from across Iran. Data were collected through individual face-to-face interviews, guided by a semi-structured interview, developed by a panel of experts and contained open-ended questions. Data analysis was performed manually using the Graneheim and Lundman approach (2004). To ensure trustworthiness, four strategies proposed by Lincoln and Guba were employed.

Results: The results revealed two main categories: direct factors and underlying factors, comprising nine subcategories. Direct factors included five subcategories: driver, pedestrian, roads and streets, vehicle, and geographic factors. Underlying factors included four subcategories: governance factors, social determinants, cultural conditions, and economic status.

Conclusion: The study identified key risk factors associated with pedestrian collisions according to experts' experiences. We recommend further qualitative studies to explore high-risk behaviors among pedestrians and drivers in depth. Additionally, systematic reviews should examine strategies employed by developing and successful countries to prevent or reduce pedestrian collisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信