具有关键目标特征的干扰物会引起注意力,但不会引起注意力:一项脑电图研究☆。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Shao-Yang Tsai, Jan Nasemann, Hermann J Müller, Zhuanghua Shi
{"title":"具有关键目标特征的干扰物会引起注意力,但不会引起注意力:一项脑电图研究☆。","authors":"Shao-Yang Tsai, Jan Nasemann, Hermann J Müller, Zhuanghua Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanisms involved in handling task-irrelevant distractors remain a topic of debate. This study investigated how spatial and feature-based attentional templates influence distractor handling. Participants searched for a target located in a known region while ignoring the distractor region. The distractor either shared the features of the target, or differed by dimension, or varied by modality. Behaviorally, distractors that matched the target features caused the most interference, more so than those differing in dimension or modality. EEG results revealed that N2pc amplitudes increased for lateral distractors, particularly when distractors shared features with the target. Cross-modal distractors elicited a distinct central contralateral negativity (CCN), but did not impair search performance. Both the CCN and positive posterior contralateral (Ppc) components indicated early sensory registration of lateralized distractors, ruling out the Ppc as a marker of early distractor suppression. These findings support the 'down-weighting' hypothesis, showing that distractors can be registered without further attentional engagement. N2pc findings also suggest that the spatial template acted through \"distractor location shielding\" rather than \"target location enhancement\". Our results suggest that effective distractor handling via distractor-location shielding and feature/dimension-based down-weighting may render proactive or reactive suppression mechanisms, typically reflected by the P<sub><sub>D</sub></sub> (Distractor Positivity) component, unnecessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distractors sharing critical target features summon, but do not engage, attention: An EEG study ☆.\",\"authors\":\"Shao-Yang Tsai, Jan Nasemann, Hermann J Müller, Zhuanghua Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.07.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The mechanisms involved in handling task-irrelevant distractors remain a topic of debate. This study investigated how spatial and feature-based attentional templates influence distractor handling. Participants searched for a target located in a known region while ignoring the distractor region. The distractor either shared the features of the target, or differed by dimension, or varied by modality. Behaviorally, distractors that matched the target features caused the most interference, more so than those differing in dimension or modality. EEG results revealed that N2pc amplitudes increased for lateral distractors, particularly when distractors shared features with the target. Cross-modal distractors elicited a distinct central contralateral negativity (CCN), but did not impair search performance. Both the CCN and positive posterior contralateral (Ppc) components indicated early sensory registration of lateralized distractors, ruling out the Ppc as a marker of early distractor suppression. These findings support the 'down-weighting' hypothesis, showing that distractors can be registered without further attentional engagement. N2pc findings also suggest that the spatial template acted through \\\"distractor location shielding\\\" rather than \\\"target location enhancement\\\". Our results suggest that effective distractor handling via distractor-location shielding and feature/dimension-based down-weighting may render proactive or reactive suppression mechanisms, typically reflected by the P<sub><sub>D</sub></sub> (Distractor Positivity) component, unnecessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cortex\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cortex\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2025.07.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2025.07.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

处理与任务无关的干扰物的机制仍然是一个有争议的话题。本研究探讨了基于空间和特征的注意模板对干扰物处理的影响。参与者搜索位于已知区域的目标,而忽略干扰区域。干扰物要么与目标物具有相同的特征,要么在维度上有所不同,要么在形态上有所不同。在行为上,与目标特征相匹配的干扰物比那些在维度或形态上不同的干扰物引起的干扰更大。脑电图结果显示,侧向分心物的N2pc振幅增加,特别是当分心物与目标具有相同特征时。跨模态干扰引起明显的中枢对侧负性(CCN),但不影响搜索性能。CCN和阳性的后对侧(Ppc)成分都表明早期感觉记录了侧化牵引器,排除了Ppc作为早期牵引器抑制的标志。这些发现支持了“减重”假说,表明干扰物可以在没有进一步注意力投入的情况下被记录下来。N2pc的研究结果还表明,空间模板通过“干扰物位置屏蔽”而不是“目标位置增强”起作用。我们的研究结果表明,通过干扰物位置屏蔽和基于特征/尺寸的降低权重来有效处理干扰物可能会使主动或被动抑制机制(通常由PD(干扰物积极性)成分反映)变得不必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distractors sharing critical target features summon, but do not engage, attention: An EEG study ☆.

The mechanisms involved in handling task-irrelevant distractors remain a topic of debate. This study investigated how spatial and feature-based attentional templates influence distractor handling. Participants searched for a target located in a known region while ignoring the distractor region. The distractor either shared the features of the target, or differed by dimension, or varied by modality. Behaviorally, distractors that matched the target features caused the most interference, more so than those differing in dimension or modality. EEG results revealed that N2pc amplitudes increased for lateral distractors, particularly when distractors shared features with the target. Cross-modal distractors elicited a distinct central contralateral negativity (CCN), but did not impair search performance. Both the CCN and positive posterior contralateral (Ppc) components indicated early sensory registration of lateralized distractors, ruling out the Ppc as a marker of early distractor suppression. These findings support the 'down-weighting' hypothesis, showing that distractors can be registered without further attentional engagement. N2pc findings also suggest that the spatial template acted through "distractor location shielding" rather than "target location enhancement". Our results suggest that effective distractor handling via distractor-location shielding and feature/dimension-based down-weighting may render proactive or reactive suppression mechanisms, typically reflected by the PD (Distractor Positivity) component, unnecessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信