运动干预对学龄ADHD儿童执行功能的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ruinan Liu, Zehui Wen, Dong Han, Ji Wang
{"title":"运动干预对学龄ADHD儿童执行功能的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ruinan Liu, Zehui Wen, Dong Han, Ji Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-24335-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Executive function deficits are a core deficit among school-aged children with ADHD. Although exercise interventions have received increasing attention in recent years, many existing studies have overlooked potential biases introduced by differences in measurement paradigms and scoring methods, which may compromise the validity and consistency of the findings. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on executive function in school-aged children with ADHD and to explore the moderating effects of measurement paradigms under different scoring methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang, covering publications from database inception to December 28, 2024. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that exercise interventions had significant overall effects on improving inhibitory control(positive scoring: g = 0.60, 95% CI [0.34, 0.87], P < 0.001; reverse scoring: g=-0.69, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.46], P < 0.001) and working memory (positive scoring: g = 0.51, 95% CI [0.30, 0.70], P < 0.001; reverse scoring: g=-0.55, 95% CI [-0.74, -0.36], P < 0.001) in school-aged children with ADHD under both positive and reverse scoring conditions. However, the overall effect on cognitive flexibility was significant only under the reverse scoring condition (g=-0.54, 95% CI [-0.75, -0.33], P < 0.001), and not under the positive scoring condition (g = 0.28, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.56], P = 0.10). Subgroup analyses further indicated that the effects of exercise interventions on inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility varied depending on the measurement paradigms and scoring methods used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions can significantly improve inhibitory control and working memory in school-aged children with ADHD. However, their effect on cognitive flexibility appears to be limited. Moreover, the observed intervention effects are influenced by the measurement paradigms and scoring. METHODS EMPLOYED: .</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"3265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of exercise interventions on executive function in school-aged children with ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ruinan Liu, Zehui Wen, Dong Han, Ji Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-24335-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Executive function deficits are a core deficit among school-aged children with ADHD. Although exercise interventions have received increasing attention in recent years, many existing studies have overlooked potential biases introduced by differences in measurement paradigms and scoring methods, which may compromise the validity and consistency of the findings. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on executive function in school-aged children with ADHD and to explore the moderating effects of measurement paradigms under different scoring methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang, covering publications from database inception to December 28, 2024. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that exercise interventions had significant overall effects on improving inhibitory control(positive scoring: g = 0.60, 95% CI [0.34, 0.87], P < 0.001; reverse scoring: g=-0.69, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.46], P < 0.001) and working memory (positive scoring: g = 0.51, 95% CI [0.30, 0.70], P < 0.001; reverse scoring: g=-0.55, 95% CI [-0.74, -0.36], P < 0.001) in school-aged children with ADHD under both positive and reverse scoring conditions. However, the overall effect on cognitive flexibility was significant only under the reverse scoring condition (g=-0.54, 95% CI [-0.75, -0.33], P < 0.001), and not under the positive scoring condition (g = 0.28, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.56], P = 0.10). Subgroup analyses further indicated that the effects of exercise interventions on inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility varied depending on the measurement paradigms and scoring methods used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions can significantly improve inhibitory control and working memory in school-aged children with ADHD. However, their effect on cognitive flexibility appears to be limited. Moreover, the observed intervention effects are influenced by the measurement paradigms and scoring. METHODS EMPLOYED: .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"3265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24335-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24335-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:执行功能缺陷是学龄ADHD儿童的核心缺陷。尽管近年来运动干预受到越来越多的关注,但许多现有的研究都忽视了测量范式和评分方法的差异所带来的潜在偏差,这可能会损害研究结果的有效性和一致性。本荟萃分析旨在评估运动干预对学龄期ADHD儿童执行功能的影响,并探讨不同评分方法下测量范式的调节作用。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Scopus、CNKI、万方等数据库,检索自建库至2024年12月28日的出版物。共纳入16项随机对照试验。meta分析采用Stata 17.0进行。结果:meta分析显示,运动干预在改善抑制控制方面具有显著的整体效果(阳性评分:g = 0.60, 95% CI [0.34, 0.87], P)。结论:运动干预可以显著改善学龄期ADHD儿童的抑制控制和工作记忆。然而,它们对认知灵活性的影响似乎有限。此外,观察到的干预效果受测量范式和评分的影响。采用方法:。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of exercise interventions on executive function in school-aged children with ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Executive function deficits are a core deficit among school-aged children with ADHD. Although exercise interventions have received increasing attention in recent years, many existing studies have overlooked potential biases introduced by differences in measurement paradigms and scoring methods, which may compromise the validity and consistency of the findings. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on executive function in school-aged children with ADHD and to explore the moderating effects of measurement paradigms under different scoring methods.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang, covering publications from database inception to December 28, 2024. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0.

Results: The meta-analysis revealed that exercise interventions had significant overall effects on improving inhibitory control(positive scoring: g = 0.60, 95% CI [0.34, 0.87], P < 0.001; reverse scoring: g=-0.69, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.46], P < 0.001) and working memory (positive scoring: g = 0.51, 95% CI [0.30, 0.70], P < 0.001; reverse scoring: g=-0.55, 95% CI [-0.74, -0.36], P < 0.001) in school-aged children with ADHD under both positive and reverse scoring conditions. However, the overall effect on cognitive flexibility was significant only under the reverse scoring condition (g=-0.54, 95% CI [-0.75, -0.33], P < 0.001), and not under the positive scoring condition (g = 0.28, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.56], P = 0.10). Subgroup analyses further indicated that the effects of exercise interventions on inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility varied depending on the measurement paradigms and scoring methods used.

Conclusion: Exercise interventions can significantly improve inhibitory control and working memory in school-aged children with ADHD. However, their effect on cognitive flexibility appears to be limited. Moreover, the observed intervention effects are influenced by the measurement paradigms and scoring. METHODS EMPLOYED: .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信