Jessica Guglielmino, Fiona J Morris, Claire M Grattidge, Denise E Jackson
{"title":"与Bio-Rad, Grifols和QuidelOrtho相比,Immulab试剂红细胞敏感性的新见解。","authors":"Jessica Guglielmino, Fiona J Morris, Claire M Grattidge, Denise E Jackson","doi":"10.1186/s13104-025-07468-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antibody screening and identification facilitates the issue of antigen-negative blood for patients with alloantibodies to red blood cell (RBC) antigens, thereby maximizing blood safety and the survival of transfused donor cells. The sensitivity and specificity of reagent red blood cells (RRBCs) used in pre-transfusion testing varies between manufacturers. This Phase II study aimed to build on a previously published Phase I study comparing the analytical performance of four manufacturers' RRBCs in column agglutination technology (CAT). A total of 231 patient samples with a negative indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) results were tested using Immulab, Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho RRBCs. Phase II results were pooled with Phase I results to provide more accurate calculations of the RRBC analytical performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the RRBCs used in the combined studies was 94.52% (95%CI 86.56-98.49%) for Bio-Rad, 81.48% (95%CI 71.30-89.25%) for Grifols, and 95.71% (95%CI 87.98-99.11%) for QuidelOrtho RRBCs. The sensitivity of Immulab RRBCs were stratified based on performance in the three CAT platforms: 100%, 95%CI 95.07-100.00% in Bio-Rad CAT, 100%, 95%CI 95.55-100.00% in Grifols CAT and 100%, 95%CI 94.87-100.00% in QuidelOrtho CAT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Immulab 0.8% RRBCs showed greater sensitivities and NPVs than the equivalent Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho RRBCs in Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho CAT, respectively. These differences may have implications in clinical pre-transfusion settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New insights into the sensitivity of Immulab reagent red blood cells compared to Bio-Rad, Grifols and QuidelOrtho.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Guglielmino, Fiona J Morris, Claire M Grattidge, Denise E Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13104-025-07468-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antibody screening and identification facilitates the issue of antigen-negative blood for patients with alloantibodies to red blood cell (RBC) antigens, thereby maximizing blood safety and the survival of transfused donor cells. The sensitivity and specificity of reagent red blood cells (RRBCs) used in pre-transfusion testing varies between manufacturers. This Phase II study aimed to build on a previously published Phase I study comparing the analytical performance of four manufacturers' RRBCs in column agglutination technology (CAT). A total of 231 patient samples with a negative indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) results were tested using Immulab, Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho RRBCs. Phase II results were pooled with Phase I results to provide more accurate calculations of the RRBC analytical performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the RRBCs used in the combined studies was 94.52% (95%CI 86.56-98.49%) for Bio-Rad, 81.48% (95%CI 71.30-89.25%) for Grifols, and 95.71% (95%CI 87.98-99.11%) for QuidelOrtho RRBCs. The sensitivity of Immulab RRBCs were stratified based on performance in the three CAT platforms: 100%, 95%CI 95.07-100.00% in Bio-Rad CAT, 100%, 95%CI 95.55-100.00% in Grifols CAT and 100%, 95%CI 94.87-100.00% in QuidelOrtho CAT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Immulab 0.8% RRBCs showed greater sensitivities and NPVs than the equivalent Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho RRBCs in Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho CAT, respectively. These differences may have implications in clinical pre-transfusion settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486663/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07468-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07468-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
New insights into the sensitivity of Immulab reagent red blood cells compared to Bio-Rad, Grifols and QuidelOrtho.
Objective: Antibody screening and identification facilitates the issue of antigen-negative blood for patients with alloantibodies to red blood cell (RBC) antigens, thereby maximizing blood safety and the survival of transfused donor cells. The sensitivity and specificity of reagent red blood cells (RRBCs) used in pre-transfusion testing varies between manufacturers. This Phase II study aimed to build on a previously published Phase I study comparing the analytical performance of four manufacturers' RRBCs in column agglutination technology (CAT). A total of 231 patient samples with a negative indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) results were tested using Immulab, Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho RRBCs. Phase II results were pooled with Phase I results to provide more accurate calculations of the RRBC analytical performance.
Results: The sensitivity of the RRBCs used in the combined studies was 94.52% (95%CI 86.56-98.49%) for Bio-Rad, 81.48% (95%CI 71.30-89.25%) for Grifols, and 95.71% (95%CI 87.98-99.11%) for QuidelOrtho RRBCs. The sensitivity of Immulab RRBCs were stratified based on performance in the three CAT platforms: 100%, 95%CI 95.07-100.00% in Bio-Rad CAT, 100%, 95%CI 95.55-100.00% in Grifols CAT and 100%, 95%CI 94.87-100.00% in QuidelOrtho CAT.
Conclusions: Immulab 0.8% RRBCs showed greater sensitivities and NPVs than the equivalent Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho RRBCs in Bio-Rad, Grifols, and QuidelOrtho CAT, respectively. These differences may have implications in clinical pre-transfusion settings.
BMC Research NotesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍:
BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.