社区参与管理伊蚊方法及影响因素——以澳大利亚北昆士兰为例

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tammy Allen, Alan Crouch, Tanya L Russell, Stephanie M Topp
{"title":"社区参与管理伊蚊方法及影响因素——以澳大利亚北昆士兰为例","authors":"Tammy Allen, Alan Crouch, Tanya L Russell, Stephanie M Topp","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-24486-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Community engagement plays a crucial role in preventing and managing Aedes-borne mosquito disease outbreaks, such as dengue. There is limited research on the engagement approaches used in high-income country contexts with existing research suggesting a preference for top-down vector control relying on one-way communication to engage and mobilize at-risk communities. The reasons behind why authorities use certain engagement approaches over others are underexplored. This study explores the community engagement approaches used in Aedes mosquito management in Townsville, Australia, and the factors influencing the choice of these approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a case study design employing two qualitative methodologies: semi-structured key informant interviews (N = 15) and a review of key documents (N = 13). Both inductive and deductive approaches were used to thematically analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A range of approaches were used to engage the community in Aedes mosquito management. From mass media campaigns and door-to-door inspections, to engaging the community in Wolbachia mosquito-releases, and helping authorities with indoor spraying during outbreak response. The factors influencing the choice of these approaches included legal obligations and regulatory compliance, vector control norms, leadership beliefs, human and financial resourcing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides new insights into why authorities adopt specific community engagement approaches in Aedes mosquito management, within a high-income country context. It identifies barriers to enhancing community engagement and suggests strategies for addressing them in future planning. These findings are particularly relevant given the increasing Aedes mosquito risk in similar high-income country settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"3255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community engagement approaches and influencing factors in Aedes mosquito management: a case study from North Queensland, Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Tammy Allen, Alan Crouch, Tanya L Russell, Stephanie M Topp\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-24486-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Community engagement plays a crucial role in preventing and managing Aedes-borne mosquito disease outbreaks, such as dengue. There is limited research on the engagement approaches used in high-income country contexts with existing research suggesting a preference for top-down vector control relying on one-way communication to engage and mobilize at-risk communities. The reasons behind why authorities use certain engagement approaches over others are underexplored. This study explores the community engagement approaches used in Aedes mosquito management in Townsville, Australia, and the factors influencing the choice of these approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a case study design employing two qualitative methodologies: semi-structured key informant interviews (N = 15) and a review of key documents (N = 13). Both inductive and deductive approaches were used to thematically analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A range of approaches were used to engage the community in Aedes mosquito management. From mass media campaigns and door-to-door inspections, to engaging the community in Wolbachia mosquito-releases, and helping authorities with indoor spraying during outbreak response. The factors influencing the choice of these approaches included legal obligations and regulatory compliance, vector control norms, leadership beliefs, human and financial resourcing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides new insights into why authorities adopt specific community engagement approaches in Aedes mosquito management, within a high-income country context. It identifies barriers to enhancing community engagement and suggests strategies for addressing them in future planning. These findings are particularly relevant given the increasing Aedes mosquito risk in similar high-income country settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"3255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486728/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24486-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24486-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:社区参与在预防和管理登革热等伊蚊传播的疾病暴发方面发挥着至关重要的作用。关于高收入国家使用的参与方法的研究有限,现有研究表明,倾向于依靠单向沟通进行自上而下的病媒控制,以参与和动员风险社区。当局为何使用某些接触方法而不是其他方法,其背后的原因尚未得到充分探讨。本研究探讨了澳大利亚汤斯维尔伊蚊管理中使用的社区参与方法,以及影响这些方法选择的因素。方法:本研究采用案例研究设计,采用两种定性方法:半结构化关键信息提供者访谈(N = 15)和关键文件回顾(N = 13)。采用归纳和演绎两种方法对数据进行主题分析。结果:采用了多种方法使社区参与伊蚊管理。从大众媒体宣传和挨家挨户检查,到让社区参与沃尔巴克氏体蚊的释放,以及在疫情应对期间帮助当局进行室内喷洒。影响选择这些办法的因素包括法律义务和法规遵守情况、病媒控制规范、领导信念、人力和财政资源。结论:本研究为高收入国家当局为何在伊蚊管理中采用特定的社区参与方法提供了新的见解。它确定了加强社区参与的障碍,并提出了在未来规划中解决这些障碍的策略。鉴于在类似的高收入国家环境中伊蚊风险日益增加,这些发现尤其具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community engagement approaches and influencing factors in Aedes mosquito management: a case study from North Queensland, Australia.

Aim: Community engagement plays a crucial role in preventing and managing Aedes-borne mosquito disease outbreaks, such as dengue. There is limited research on the engagement approaches used in high-income country contexts with existing research suggesting a preference for top-down vector control relying on one-way communication to engage and mobilize at-risk communities. The reasons behind why authorities use certain engagement approaches over others are underexplored. This study explores the community engagement approaches used in Aedes mosquito management in Townsville, Australia, and the factors influencing the choice of these approaches.

Methods: The study used a case study design employing two qualitative methodologies: semi-structured key informant interviews (N = 15) and a review of key documents (N = 13). Both inductive and deductive approaches were used to thematically analyse the data.

Results: A range of approaches were used to engage the community in Aedes mosquito management. From mass media campaigns and door-to-door inspections, to engaging the community in Wolbachia mosquito-releases, and helping authorities with indoor spraying during outbreak response. The factors influencing the choice of these approaches included legal obligations and regulatory compliance, vector control norms, leadership beliefs, human and financial resourcing.

Conclusions: This study provides new insights into why authorities adopt specific community engagement approaches in Aedes mosquito management, within a high-income country context. It identifies barriers to enhancing community engagement and suggests strategies for addressing them in future planning. These findings are particularly relevant given the increasing Aedes mosquito risk in similar high-income country settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信