打破欧盟与拉美国家趋同的神话:来自联合国决议的分析

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Rafael Mesquita, Bruno Theodoro Luciano
{"title":"打破欧盟与拉美国家趋同的神话:来自联合国决议的分析","authors":"Rafael Mesquita,&nbsp;Bruno Theodoro Luciano","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Politicians and scholars have often considered Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean as like-minded, natural partners, characterized not only by historical and cultural ties, but also by shared values and principles. This article aims to test the extent to which EU-LAC convergence is a reality by comparing the agreement between both regions in multilateral arenas. Specifically, we explore the similarity in roll-call votes and cosponsorship of draft resolutions at the UN General Assembly from 2000 to 2020. EU-LAC convergence on those metrics is placed into perspective by comparing similarities across all UN regional groups. Furthermore, our analysis zooms in on the content of the proposals to detect the issues that have caused greater divergence/convergence between EU-LAC. We find that the two regions continuously cooperate on the rights of the child, but are increasingly at odds with regard to topics such as human rights and armaments. The realist tone of these themes suggests that a normative Europe has met an emerging geopolitical Europe that is increasingly concerned with security-related issues. We trace this new agenda to the rising challenges in Europe's external relations, from protectionism to the Russia–Ukraine war, and see the diminishing EU-LAC convergence as its multilateral expression.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 4","pages":"589-601"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Busting the Myth of Convergence Between the EU and LAC Countries: Analysis From UN Resolutions\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Mesquita,&nbsp;Bruno Theodoro Luciano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.13491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Politicians and scholars have often considered Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean as like-minded, natural partners, characterized not only by historical and cultural ties, but also by shared values and principles. This article aims to test the extent to which EU-LAC convergence is a reality by comparing the agreement between both regions in multilateral arenas. Specifically, we explore the similarity in roll-call votes and cosponsorship of draft resolutions at the UN General Assembly from 2000 to 2020. EU-LAC convergence on those metrics is placed into perspective by comparing similarities across all UN regional groups. Furthermore, our analysis zooms in on the content of the proposals to detect the issues that have caused greater divergence/convergence between EU-LAC. We find that the two regions continuously cooperate on the rights of the child, but are increasingly at odds with regard to topics such as human rights and armaments. The realist tone of these themes suggests that a normative Europe has met an emerging geopolitical Europe that is increasingly concerned with security-related issues. We trace this new agenda to the rising challenges in Europe's external relations, from protectionism to the Russia–Ukraine war, and see the diminishing EU-LAC convergence as its multilateral expression.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"589-601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13491\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治家和学者经常认为欧洲和拉丁美洲及加勒比是志同道合的天然伙伴,不仅具有历史和文化联系,而且具有共同的价值观和原则。本文旨在通过比较这两个地区在多边领域的协议来检验欧盟-拉丁美洲趋同的现实程度。具体而言,我们探讨了2000年至2020年联合国大会唱名表决和共同提出决议草案的相似性。通过比较联合国所有区域集团的相似之处,对欧盟-拉丁美洲在这些指标上的趋同进行了透视。此外,我们的分析放大了提案的内容,以发现导致欧盟-拉丁美洲和拉丁美洲之间更大分歧/趋同的问题。我们发现,这两个区域继续在儿童权利方面进行合作,但在人权和军备等问题上的分歧越来越大。这些主题的现实主义基调表明,一个规范的欧洲遇到了一个日益关注安全相关问题的新兴地缘政治欧洲。我们将这一新议程追溯到欧洲对外关系中不断上升的挑战,从保护主义到俄乌战争,并将欧盟-拉美地区日益减弱的趋同视为其多边表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Busting the Myth of Convergence Between the EU and LAC Countries: Analysis From UN Resolutions

Busting the Myth of Convergence Between the EU and LAC Countries: Analysis From UN Resolutions

Politicians and scholars have often considered Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean as like-minded, natural partners, characterized not only by historical and cultural ties, but also by shared values and principles. This article aims to test the extent to which EU-LAC convergence is a reality by comparing the agreement between both regions in multilateral arenas. Specifically, we explore the similarity in roll-call votes and cosponsorship of draft resolutions at the UN General Assembly from 2000 to 2020. EU-LAC convergence on those metrics is placed into perspective by comparing similarities across all UN regional groups. Furthermore, our analysis zooms in on the content of the proposals to detect the issues that have caused greater divergence/convergence between EU-LAC. We find that the two regions continuously cooperate on the rights of the child, but are increasingly at odds with regard to topics such as human rights and armaments. The realist tone of these themes suggests that a normative Europe has met an emerging geopolitical Europe that is increasingly concerned with security-related issues. We trace this new agenda to the rising challenges in Europe's external relations, from protectionism to the Russia–Ukraine war, and see the diminishing EU-LAC convergence as its multilateral expression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信