谁能部署平流层气溶胶注入?美国、中国和大规模、快速的行星冷却

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Joshua B. Horton, Wake Smith, David W. Keith
{"title":"谁能部署平流层气溶胶注入?美国、中国和大规模、快速的行星冷却","authors":"Joshua B. Horton,&nbsp;Wake Smith,&nbsp;David W. Keith","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Stratospheric aerosol injection, which would reflect a small fraction of sunlight away from the Earth to lower temperatures, involves many unanswered questions. One of these is, who could deploy it? We consider this with reference to a scenario in which global temperatures are reduced by 1°C by midcentury; we term this a ‘PLUS’ deployment—Planetary, Large-scale, Uninterrupted, and Speedy. The technical requirements of a PLUS deployment—a fleet of a hundred or more specialized aircraft—limit the number of capable actors to ten states. The geopolitical requirements—broad-spectrum capabilities sufficient to overcome external constraints—mean that only the US and China are capable of implementing unilaterally against strong opposition. As such, the US and China will be decisive in determining whether and how a PLUS-type deployment takes place. In particular, the degree of Sino-American alignment on this issue will strongly influence the likelihood of a PLUS deployment and its disruptive potential. We examine three cases in which activities with the potential to harm global commons were debated during the Cold War: scientific research in Antarctica, atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, and experiments in outer space. Backed by evidence from these cases, we then consider several implications of our findings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 4","pages":"514-524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Could Deploy Stratospheric Aerosol Injection? The United States, China, and Large-Scale, Rapid Planetary Cooling\",\"authors\":\"Joshua B. Horton,&nbsp;Wake Smith,&nbsp;David W. Keith\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-5899.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Stratospheric aerosol injection, which would reflect a small fraction of sunlight away from the Earth to lower temperatures, involves many unanswered questions. One of these is, who could deploy it? We consider this with reference to a scenario in which global temperatures are reduced by 1°C by midcentury; we term this a ‘PLUS’ deployment—Planetary, Large-scale, Uninterrupted, and Speedy. The technical requirements of a PLUS deployment—a fleet of a hundred or more specialized aircraft—limit the number of capable actors to ten states. The geopolitical requirements—broad-spectrum capabilities sufficient to overcome external constraints—mean that only the US and China are capable of implementing unilaterally against strong opposition. As such, the US and China will be decisive in determining whether and how a PLUS-type deployment takes place. In particular, the degree of Sino-American alignment on this issue will strongly influence the likelihood of a PLUS deployment and its disruptive potential. We examine three cases in which activities with the potential to harm global commons were debated during the Cold War: scientific research in Antarctica, atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, and experiments in outer space. Backed by evidence from these cases, we then consider several implications of our findings.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Policy\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"514-524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

平流层气溶胶注入会将一小部分阳光从地球反射到较低的温度,这涉及到许多悬而未决的问题。其中之一是,谁能部署它?我们考虑的是这样一种情景:到本世纪中叶,全球气温下降1°C;我们称之为“PLUS”部署——行星式、大规模、不间断和快速。PLUS部署的技术要求——由100架或更多的专用飞机组成的机队——将有能力的参与者的数量限制在10个国家。地缘政治要求——足以克服外部限制的广谱能力——意味着只有美国和中国有能力在强烈反对的情况下单方面实施。因此,美国和中国将在决定是否以及如何进行加式部署方面发挥决定性作用。特别是,中美在这个问题上的一致程度将强烈影响部署PLUS的可能性及其破坏性潜力。我们研究了冷战期间对可能危害全球公域的活动进行辩论的三个案例:南极洲的科学研究、核武器的大气试验和外层空间的实验。在这些案例的证据的支持下,我们考虑了我们的发现的几个含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Who Could Deploy Stratospheric Aerosol Injection? The United States, China, and Large-Scale, Rapid Planetary Cooling

Who Could Deploy Stratospheric Aerosol Injection? The United States, China, and Large-Scale, Rapid Planetary Cooling

Stratospheric aerosol injection, which would reflect a small fraction of sunlight away from the Earth to lower temperatures, involves many unanswered questions. One of these is, who could deploy it? We consider this with reference to a scenario in which global temperatures are reduced by 1°C by midcentury; we term this a ‘PLUS’ deployment—Planetary, Large-scale, Uninterrupted, and Speedy. The technical requirements of a PLUS deployment—a fleet of a hundred or more specialized aircraft—limit the number of capable actors to ten states. The geopolitical requirements—broad-spectrum capabilities sufficient to overcome external constraints—mean that only the US and China are capable of implementing unilaterally against strong opposition. As such, the US and China will be decisive in determining whether and how a PLUS-type deployment takes place. In particular, the degree of Sino-American alignment on this issue will strongly influence the likelihood of a PLUS deployment and its disruptive potential. We examine three cases in which activities with the potential to harm global commons were debated during the Cold War: scientific research in Antarctica, atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, and experiments in outer space. Backed by evidence from these cases, we then consider several implications of our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信