A-186使用Sigma指标和质量目标指数对选定生化试验进行性能评价

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Rajendra Bhatt
{"title":"A-186使用Sigma指标和质量目标指数对选定生化试验进行性能评价","authors":"Rajendra Bhatt","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Quality reporting is a critical global concern, necessitating the implementation and evaluation of quality indicators to ensure reliable outcomes. While developed countries have established benchmarks through national policies and significantly minimized errors, developing nations like Nepal remain in the early stages of adopting such practices. Sigma metrics approach provide a robust framework for performance evaluation, while the Quality Goal Index (QGI) aids in identifying causes of low sigma values. The integration of Westgard rules with Sigma metrics enables tailored quality control strategies, ensuring compliance with stringent standards and reducing errors effectively. This study aimed to analyze the performance of a selected biochemical tests using Sigma metrics and the Quality Goal Index. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory of Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal, from April to June 2024. Twenty routine biochemical tests were analyzed using the Vitros 5600 analyzer. Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index (QGI) were derived from internal and external quality control data. Method Decision Charts were employed for visual performance evaluation. Statistical analysis was conducted using MS Excel and STATA to calculate and interpret the results. Results Tests with high Sigma Metrics, such as Triacylglycerol and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), exhibited excellent performance, indicating optimal accuracy and precision. Conversely, tests with low Sigma Metrics, including Alanine transaminase (ALT) and albumin, showed unacceptable performance, with QGI analysis identifying significant inaccuracies and imprecision. Conclusion This study emphasizes the application of Sigma metrics and the Quality Goal Index (QGI) to evaluate test performance and the implementation of Westgard rules to enhance Quality Control (QC) strategies. It recommends refining QC protocols, conducting long-term performance monitoring, and assessing performance across analyzers to drive continuous quality improvement.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A-186 Performance Evaluation of Selected Biochemical Tests Using Sigma Metrics and the Quality Goal Index\",\"authors\":\"Rajendra Bhatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Quality reporting is a critical global concern, necessitating the implementation and evaluation of quality indicators to ensure reliable outcomes. While developed countries have established benchmarks through national policies and significantly minimized errors, developing nations like Nepal remain in the early stages of adopting such practices. Sigma metrics approach provide a robust framework for performance evaluation, while the Quality Goal Index (QGI) aids in identifying causes of low sigma values. The integration of Westgard rules with Sigma metrics enables tailored quality control strategies, ensuring compliance with stringent standards and reducing errors effectively. This study aimed to analyze the performance of a selected biochemical tests using Sigma metrics and the Quality Goal Index. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory of Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal, from April to June 2024. Twenty routine biochemical tests were analyzed using the Vitros 5600 analyzer. Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index (QGI) were derived from internal and external quality control data. Method Decision Charts were employed for visual performance evaluation. Statistical analysis was conducted using MS Excel and STATA to calculate and interpret the results. Results Tests with high Sigma Metrics, such as Triacylglycerol and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), exhibited excellent performance, indicating optimal accuracy and precision. Conversely, tests with low Sigma Metrics, including Alanine transaminase (ALT) and albumin, showed unacceptable performance, with QGI analysis identifying significant inaccuracies and imprecision. Conclusion This study emphasizes the application of Sigma metrics and the Quality Goal Index (QGI) to evaluate test performance and the implementation of Westgard rules to enhance Quality Control (QC) strategies. It recommends refining QC protocols, conducting long-term performance monitoring, and assessing performance across analyzers to drive continuous quality improvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.180\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质量报告是全球关注的关键问题,需要实施和评估质量指标,以确保可靠的结果。虽然发达国家已经通过国家政策建立了基准,并大大减少了错误,但像尼泊尔这样的发展中国家仍处于采用此类做法的早期阶段。西格玛度量方法为绩效评估提供了一个健壮的框架,而质量目标指数(QGI)有助于确定低西格玛值的原因。Westgard规则与Sigma指标的集成可以定制质量控制策略,确保遵守严格的标准并有效地减少错误。本研究旨在利用西格玛指标和质量目标指数分析选定生化试验的性能。方法于2024年4 - 6月在尼泊尔Dhulikhel医院-加德满都大学医院临床生物化学实验室进行横断面研究。采用Vitros 5600分析仪对20项常规生化指标进行分析。Sigma指标和质量目标指数(QGI)来源于内部和外部质量控制数据。方法采用决策图进行视觉性能评价。采用MS Excel和STATA进行统计分析,对结果进行计算和解释。结果三酰甘油和碱性磷酸酶(ALP)等具有高西格玛指标的测试均表现出优异的性能,具有最佳的准确度和精密度。相反,低Sigma指标的测试,包括谷丙转氨酶(ALT)和白蛋白,表现出不可接受的性能,QGI分析发现了显著的不准确性和不精确性。结论本研究强调应用Sigma指标和质量目标指数(QGI)来评价试验绩效,实施Westgard规则来加强质量控制(QC)策略。它建议改进QC协议,进行长期性能监控,并评估分析仪的性能,以推动持续的质量改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A-186 Performance Evaluation of Selected Biochemical Tests Using Sigma Metrics and the Quality Goal Index
Background Quality reporting is a critical global concern, necessitating the implementation and evaluation of quality indicators to ensure reliable outcomes. While developed countries have established benchmarks through national policies and significantly minimized errors, developing nations like Nepal remain in the early stages of adopting such practices. Sigma metrics approach provide a robust framework for performance evaluation, while the Quality Goal Index (QGI) aids in identifying causes of low sigma values. The integration of Westgard rules with Sigma metrics enables tailored quality control strategies, ensuring compliance with stringent standards and reducing errors effectively. This study aimed to analyze the performance of a selected biochemical tests using Sigma metrics and the Quality Goal Index. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory of Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal, from April to June 2024. Twenty routine biochemical tests were analyzed using the Vitros 5600 analyzer. Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index (QGI) were derived from internal and external quality control data. Method Decision Charts were employed for visual performance evaluation. Statistical analysis was conducted using MS Excel and STATA to calculate and interpret the results. Results Tests with high Sigma Metrics, such as Triacylglycerol and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), exhibited excellent performance, indicating optimal accuracy and precision. Conversely, tests with low Sigma Metrics, including Alanine transaminase (ALT) and albumin, showed unacceptable performance, with QGI analysis identifying significant inaccuracies and imprecision. Conclusion This study emphasizes the application of Sigma metrics and the Quality Goal Index (QGI) to evaluate test performance and the implementation of Westgard rules to enhance Quality Control (QC) strategies. It recommends refining QC protocols, conducting long-term performance monitoring, and assessing performance across analyzers to drive continuous quality improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信