外科麻醉师二元熟悉度与手术死亡率之间的关系:一项大型心脏外科学术项目的回顾性研究。

Sameer Lakha,Sharon G Huang,Cindy Wang,Eric Rome,Natalia Egorova,Yuxia Ouyang,Matthew A Levin,Samuel DeMaria
{"title":"外科麻醉师二元熟悉度与手术死亡率之间的关系:一项大型心脏外科学术项目的回顾性研究。","authors":"Sameer Lakha,Sharon G Huang,Cindy Wang,Eric Rome,Natalia Egorova,Yuxia Ouyang,Matthew A Levin,Samuel DeMaria","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000007759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nEffective teamwork is essential in high-stakes environments such as cardiac surgery, where complex procedures require coordinated efforts, particularly between surgeons and anesthesiologists. While team dynamics have been shown to affect surgical outcomes, the impact of surgeon-anesthesiologist familiarity on operative mortality in cardiac surgery remains underexplored. We aimed to assess whether increased familiarity within this dyad was associated with reduced operative mortality and improved patient outcomes.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study using data from a large academic medical center, covering cases from July 2011 to January 2024. Surgeon-anesthesiologist dyads were defined by unique pairings who worked together in each case. Familiarity was measured by the frequency of collaboration over the previous 365 days and divided into quintiles. The primary outcome was operative mortality, defined as death before discharge or within 30 days post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included operative length, hospital and intensive care length of stay, reoperation, readmission, and reported organ system complications. A logistic mixed-effects model adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type, was used to examine associations.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe identified 481 unique surgeon-anesthesiologist pairs from 16,811 cases. Higher dyad familiarity was associated with significantly lower operative mortality when analyzing the entire cohort (P < .001). Patients cared for by higher-familiarity dyads also had reduced rates of several adverse outcomes, although deep sternal wound infection showed no association with dyad familiarity. After adjusting for confounders, the odds of operative mortality were significantly higher for the lowest-familiarity dyads compared to the highest-familiarity dyads (odds ratio [OR], 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-2.81, P = .001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIncreased surgeon-anesthesiologist familiarity was associated with lower operative mortality and improved outcomes in cardiac surgery, highlighting the importance of consistent team collaboration. Multi-center studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore familiarity's effects across diverse clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Dyad Familiarity and Operative Mortality: A Retrospective Study at a Large Academic Cardiac Surgery Program.\",\"authors\":\"Sameer Lakha,Sharon G Huang,Cindy Wang,Eric Rome,Natalia Egorova,Yuxia Ouyang,Matthew A Levin,Samuel DeMaria\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ane.0000000000007759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nEffective teamwork is essential in high-stakes environments such as cardiac surgery, where complex procedures require coordinated efforts, particularly between surgeons and anesthesiologists. While team dynamics have been shown to affect surgical outcomes, the impact of surgeon-anesthesiologist familiarity on operative mortality in cardiac surgery remains underexplored. We aimed to assess whether increased familiarity within this dyad was associated with reduced operative mortality and improved patient outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study using data from a large academic medical center, covering cases from July 2011 to January 2024. Surgeon-anesthesiologist dyads were defined by unique pairings who worked together in each case. Familiarity was measured by the frequency of collaboration over the previous 365 days and divided into quintiles. The primary outcome was operative mortality, defined as death before discharge or within 30 days post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included operative length, hospital and intensive care length of stay, reoperation, readmission, and reported organ system complications. A logistic mixed-effects model adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type, was used to examine associations.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nWe identified 481 unique surgeon-anesthesiologist pairs from 16,811 cases. Higher dyad familiarity was associated with significantly lower operative mortality when analyzing the entire cohort (P < .001). Patients cared for by higher-familiarity dyads also had reduced rates of several adverse outcomes, although deep sternal wound infection showed no association with dyad familiarity. After adjusting for confounders, the odds of operative mortality were significantly higher for the lowest-familiarity dyads compared to the highest-familiarity dyads (odds ratio [OR], 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-2.81, P = .001).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nIncreased surgeon-anesthesiologist familiarity was associated with lower operative mortality and improved outcomes in cardiac surgery, highlighting the importance of consistent team collaboration. Multi-center studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore familiarity's effects across diverse clinical settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia & Analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高风险的环境中,有效的团队合作是必不可少的,如心脏手术,复杂的程序需要协调努力,特别是在外科医生和麻醉师之间。虽然团队动态已被证明会影响手术结果,但外科麻醉师熟悉程度对心脏外科手术死亡率的影响仍未得到充分探讨。我们的目的是评估在这两个群体中增加熟悉度是否与降低手术死亡率和改善患者预后有关。方法采用回顾性、单中心队列研究,数据来自某大型学术医疗中心,涵盖2011年7月至2024年1月的病例。外科麻醉师二人组被定义为在每种情况下一起工作的独特配对。熟悉度是通过过去365天的合作频率来衡量的,并分为五分位数。主要终点为手术死亡率,定义为出院前或术后30天内死亡。次要结局包括手术时间、住院和重症监护时间、再手术、再入院和报告的器官系统并发症。采用logistic混合效应模型对患者人口统计学、合并症和手术类型进行调整,以检验相关性。结果从16,811例病例中鉴定出481对独特的外科麻醉师对。在分析整个队列时,较高的双染色体熟悉度与较低的手术死亡率相关(P < 0.001)。虽然深胸骨伤口感染与熟悉度无关,但熟悉度较高的双性恋患者的不良反应发生率也有所降低。调整混杂因素后,最低熟悉度组的手术死亡率明显高于最高熟悉度组(比值比[OR], 1.90, 95%可信区间[CI], 1.29-2.81, P = .001)。结论:外科麻醉师熟悉程度的提高与心脏外科手术死亡率的降低和预后的改善相关,强调了团队合作的重要性。需要多中心研究来验证这些发现,并探索熟悉度在不同临床环境中的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association Between Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Dyad Familiarity and Operative Mortality: A Retrospective Study at a Large Academic Cardiac Surgery Program.
BACKGROUND Effective teamwork is essential in high-stakes environments such as cardiac surgery, where complex procedures require coordinated efforts, particularly between surgeons and anesthesiologists. While team dynamics have been shown to affect surgical outcomes, the impact of surgeon-anesthesiologist familiarity on operative mortality in cardiac surgery remains underexplored. We aimed to assess whether increased familiarity within this dyad was associated with reduced operative mortality and improved patient outcomes. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study using data from a large academic medical center, covering cases from July 2011 to January 2024. Surgeon-anesthesiologist dyads were defined by unique pairings who worked together in each case. Familiarity was measured by the frequency of collaboration over the previous 365 days and divided into quintiles. The primary outcome was operative mortality, defined as death before discharge or within 30 days post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included operative length, hospital and intensive care length of stay, reoperation, readmission, and reported organ system complications. A logistic mixed-effects model adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type, was used to examine associations. RESULTS We identified 481 unique surgeon-anesthesiologist pairs from 16,811 cases. Higher dyad familiarity was associated with significantly lower operative mortality when analyzing the entire cohort (P < .001). Patients cared for by higher-familiarity dyads also had reduced rates of several adverse outcomes, although deep sternal wound infection showed no association with dyad familiarity. After adjusting for confounders, the odds of operative mortality were significantly higher for the lowest-familiarity dyads compared to the highest-familiarity dyads (odds ratio [OR], 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-2.81, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Increased surgeon-anesthesiologist familiarity was associated with lower operative mortality and improved outcomes in cardiac surgery, highlighting the importance of consistent team collaboration. Multi-center studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore familiarity's effects across diverse clinical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信