a -321快速、通用和自动化脓毒症诊断工作流程的性能评估,该工作流程可直接从全血中识别病原体并确定其抗菌素耐药性

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Ramya VM, Divya Khandige Sharma, Rangarajan Sampath, Megan Carpenter, Ishita Chakraborty, Thomas A Hall, Michael Mosel, James Hannis, Lisa Risen, Christine Marzan, Robert Bonomo
{"title":"a -321快速、通用和自动化脓毒症诊断工作流程的性能评估,该工作流程可直接从全血中识别病原体并确定其抗菌素耐药性","authors":"Ramya VM, Divya Khandige Sharma, Rangarajan Sampath, Megan Carpenter, Ishita Chakraborty, Thomas A Hall, Michael Mosel, James Hannis, Lisa Risen, Christine Marzan, Robert Bonomo","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Fast and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSIs) is critical for administering an appropriate treatment regimen in patients, who face hourly-increasing mortality risk due to sepsis. The current gold standard technique is blood culture, and it takes 15 to 72 hours for pathogen identification (ID) and an additional 8 to 15 hours for antimicrobial susceptibility (AST). Apart from the long turnaround time, blood culture is prone to false positives and negatives. Most of the nucleic acid-based methods in the market also require blood culture as a starting sample and/or are limited in identifying pre-defined set of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. Hence, the availability of a rapid, agnostic pathogen diagnostic for sepsis which detects pathogens and associated AMR directly from whole blood in a clinically actionable turnaround time, remains a major unmet need in managing critically ill patients. Towards advancing the field of sepsis diagnostics, we have developed a cutting-edge approach called ASPIRE: Agnostic Sepsis Pathogen Identification and REsistance determination. This workflow is rapid, agnostic, quantitative, automation amenable and based on nanopore sequencing that can report pathogen ID and AMR determinants, directly from whole blood, within 6 to 8 hours. The workflow is illustrated in figure 1. Methods We evaluated the performance of ASPIRE workflow using 3 to 5 mL contrived blood samples (n=50) spiked with typical BSI bacteria and fungi at 10 to 100 CFU/mL. We also tested =1.0 mL clinical samples (n=50 confirmed positives and 10 confirmed negatives, tested as blinded samples) to evaluate the clinical concordance of the ASPIRE workflow with blood culture outcomes. Results The ASPIRE workflow can detect 10-100 CFU/mL of spiked bacteria and fungi in 6 to 8 hours turnaround time. We have achieved removal of 95 to 99% human genomic DNA from 3 mL blood samples. Multiple AMR determinants were also detected within blinded clinical samples. We observed significant concordance with clinical samples. Conclusion ASPIRE is a novel, cutting-edge, rapid, and universal Sepsis diagnostic workflow that can identify pathogens and characterize their AMR, directly from whole blood. Clinical studies showed significant concordance between blood cultures and ASPIRE workflows. This work has been supported by NIH-NIAID funding under the contract 75N93023C00025","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A-321 Performance evaluation of a rapid, universal and automation amenable sepsis diagnostic workflow that identifies pathogens and determines their antimicrobial resistance directly from whole blood\",\"authors\":\"Ramya VM, Divya Khandige Sharma, Rangarajan Sampath, Megan Carpenter, Ishita Chakraborty, Thomas A Hall, Michael Mosel, James Hannis, Lisa Risen, Christine Marzan, Robert Bonomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Fast and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSIs) is critical for administering an appropriate treatment regimen in patients, who face hourly-increasing mortality risk due to sepsis. The current gold standard technique is blood culture, and it takes 15 to 72 hours for pathogen identification (ID) and an additional 8 to 15 hours for antimicrobial susceptibility (AST). Apart from the long turnaround time, blood culture is prone to false positives and negatives. Most of the nucleic acid-based methods in the market also require blood culture as a starting sample and/or are limited in identifying pre-defined set of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. Hence, the availability of a rapid, agnostic pathogen diagnostic for sepsis which detects pathogens and associated AMR directly from whole blood in a clinically actionable turnaround time, remains a major unmet need in managing critically ill patients. Towards advancing the field of sepsis diagnostics, we have developed a cutting-edge approach called ASPIRE: Agnostic Sepsis Pathogen Identification and REsistance determination. This workflow is rapid, agnostic, quantitative, automation amenable and based on nanopore sequencing that can report pathogen ID and AMR determinants, directly from whole blood, within 6 to 8 hours. The workflow is illustrated in figure 1. Methods We evaluated the performance of ASPIRE workflow using 3 to 5 mL contrived blood samples (n=50) spiked with typical BSI bacteria and fungi at 10 to 100 CFU/mL. We also tested =1.0 mL clinical samples (n=50 confirmed positives and 10 confirmed negatives, tested as blinded samples) to evaluate the clinical concordance of the ASPIRE workflow with blood culture outcomes. Results The ASPIRE workflow can detect 10-100 CFU/mL of spiked bacteria and fungi in 6 to 8 hours turnaround time. We have achieved removal of 95 to 99% human genomic DNA from 3 mL blood samples. Multiple AMR determinants were also detected within blinded clinical samples. We observed significant concordance with clinical samples. Conclusion ASPIRE is a novel, cutting-edge, rapid, and universal Sepsis diagnostic workflow that can identify pathogens and characterize their AMR, directly from whole blood. Clinical studies showed significant concordance between blood cultures and ASPIRE workflows. This work has been supported by NIH-NIAID funding under the contract 75N93023C00025\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.309\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景血液感染(bsi)的快速准确诊断对于败血症患者给予适当的治疗方案至关重要,这些患者面临着每小时增加的死亡风险。目前的金标准技术是血培养,需要15至72小时进行病原体鉴定(ID),另外需要8至15小时进行抗菌药物敏感性(AST)。除了周转时间长,血培养容易出现假阳性和假阴性。市场上大多数基于核酸的方法还需要血液培养作为起始样本,并且/或者在确定预先定义的一组病原体和抗菌素耐药性(AMR)基因方面受到限制。因此,在临床可行的周转时间内直接从全血中检测病原体和相关抗菌素耐药性的败血症的快速、不可知病原体诊断的可用性,仍然是管理危重患者的主要未满足需求。为了推进败血症诊断领域,我们开发了一种名为ASPIRE的尖端方法:不可知论败血症病原体鉴定和耐药性测定。该工作流程快速、不可知、定量、自动化,并基于纳米孔测序,可在6至8小时内直接从全血中报告病原体ID和AMR决定因素。工作流如图1所示。方法采用3 ~ 5ml人工血液样本(n=50),以10 ~ 100 CFU/mL的浓度添加典型BSI细菌和真菌,评估ASPIRE工作流程的性能。我们还测试了1.0 mL临床样本(n=50例确诊阳性和10例确诊阴性,作为盲法样本进行测试),以评估ASPIRE工作流程与血培养结果的临床一致性。结果ASPIRE流程可在6 ~ 8小时内检测出10 ~ 100 CFU/mL的加标细菌和真菌。我们已经从3毫升血液样本中提取了95%到99%的人类基因组DNA。在盲法临床样本中也检测到多种AMR决定因素。我们观察到与临床样本有显著的一致性。ASPIRE是一种新颖、前沿、快速、通用的脓毒症诊断流程,可以直接从全血中识别病原体并表征其AMR。临床研究表明,血液培养和ASPIRE工作流程之间存在显著的一致性。本研究由NIH-NIAID资助,合同号75N93023C00025
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A-321 Performance evaluation of a rapid, universal and automation amenable sepsis diagnostic workflow that identifies pathogens and determines their antimicrobial resistance directly from whole blood
Background Fast and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSIs) is critical for administering an appropriate treatment regimen in patients, who face hourly-increasing mortality risk due to sepsis. The current gold standard technique is blood culture, and it takes 15 to 72 hours for pathogen identification (ID) and an additional 8 to 15 hours for antimicrobial susceptibility (AST). Apart from the long turnaround time, blood culture is prone to false positives and negatives. Most of the nucleic acid-based methods in the market also require blood culture as a starting sample and/or are limited in identifying pre-defined set of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. Hence, the availability of a rapid, agnostic pathogen diagnostic for sepsis which detects pathogens and associated AMR directly from whole blood in a clinically actionable turnaround time, remains a major unmet need in managing critically ill patients. Towards advancing the field of sepsis diagnostics, we have developed a cutting-edge approach called ASPIRE: Agnostic Sepsis Pathogen Identification and REsistance determination. This workflow is rapid, agnostic, quantitative, automation amenable and based on nanopore sequencing that can report pathogen ID and AMR determinants, directly from whole blood, within 6 to 8 hours. The workflow is illustrated in figure 1. Methods We evaluated the performance of ASPIRE workflow using 3 to 5 mL contrived blood samples (n=50) spiked with typical BSI bacteria and fungi at 10 to 100 CFU/mL. We also tested =1.0 mL clinical samples (n=50 confirmed positives and 10 confirmed negatives, tested as blinded samples) to evaluate the clinical concordance of the ASPIRE workflow with blood culture outcomes. Results The ASPIRE workflow can detect 10-100 CFU/mL of spiked bacteria and fungi in 6 to 8 hours turnaround time. We have achieved removal of 95 to 99% human genomic DNA from 3 mL blood samples. Multiple AMR determinants were also detected within blinded clinical samples. We observed significant concordance with clinical samples. Conclusion ASPIRE is a novel, cutting-edge, rapid, and universal Sepsis diagnostic workflow that can identify pathogens and characterize their AMR, directly from whole blood. Clinical studies showed significant concordance between blood cultures and ASPIRE workflows. This work has been supported by NIH-NIAID funding under the contract 75N93023C00025
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信