A-094迈瑞G6PDH -一种高效准确的G6PD缺乏症人群识别方法

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jian Dai, Qinlan Liu, Kaixiong Xu, Jin Li, Anping Xu, Feng Wang
{"title":"A-094迈瑞G6PDH -一种高效准确的G6PD缺乏症人群识别方法","authors":"Jian Dai, Qinlan Liu, Kaixiong Xu, Jin Li, Anping Xu, Feng Wang","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing is used for diagnosis of G6PD deficiency. World Health Organization (WHO) advises that an individual’s G6PD status should be determined to guide dose and duration of anti-malarial drugs, and there are still unmet needs for G6PD testing to early screen neonates. The existing G6PD screening methods usually require multiple steps of manual operation. The results of these methods are often impacted by the variability or errors in manual operation. Therefore, they are difficult to accurately identify the population with G6PD mutation. This study evaluated the performance of a novel fully-automated G6PD/Hb detection method (G6PDH), and compared its diagnostic value with other methods, so as to provide a more precise technical means for the early screening and diagnosis of the disease. Methods In this study, the automatic lysis mode of Mindray BS-2800M analyzer was used to realize the G6PD/Hb twin-tests in parallel, in which G6PD and Hb (hemoglobin) were detected simultaneously using the same blood sample, and the G6PD/Hb ratio was calculated, defined as G6PDH. The age and gender specific reference intervals with this method were established. Based on the results of Multiplex Melting Curve Analysis (MMCA, a genetic mutation detecting method), the diagnostic efficacy and accordance rate of G6PDH and other biochemical methods such as G6PD/6PGD, G6PD single enzyme method were analyzed. Results According to the guidance of WHO, the reference intervals of G6PDH in non-neonates were established as <2.31, =2.31, 2.31∼6.17, =6.17 for deficient males/females, normal males, intermediate females, and normal females. For neonates, they were <4.14, =4.14, 4.14∼11.03, =11.03, respectively. Compared with the results of MMCA method on 185 samples, the sensitivity and accuracy of the G6PDH method were 93.5% and 91.7% respectively, which were significantly higher than those of G6PD/6PGD method (74.0%, 74.4%) and G6PD single enzyme method (68.3%, 67.8%). The Youden index of G6PDH method was 0.81, higher than that of 0.74 and 0.63 by other two methods, respectively. And the missed diagnosis rate was 6.5%, lower than that of the other two methods (26.0%, 31.7%). Moreover, in 64 female patients with heterozygous mutation, the diagnose accordance rate of G6PDH was 87.5%, while the other two was 51.6% and 39.1%. Conclusion Mindray provides an innovative automated G6PDH method on BS-2800M to accurately identify G6PD deficiency population, and significantly reduces the missed diagnosis rate of high-risk population with G6PD deficiency, especially for female heterozygous mutation. The G6PDH method could be well used for the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of G6PD deficiency, and could be considered as the preferred method in clinical laboratory.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A-094 Mindray G6PDH –An Efficient and Accurate Method for Identifying G6PD Deficiency Population\",\"authors\":\"Jian Dai, Qinlan Liu, Kaixiong Xu, Jin Li, Anping Xu, Feng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing is used for diagnosis of G6PD deficiency. World Health Organization (WHO) advises that an individual’s G6PD status should be determined to guide dose and duration of anti-malarial drugs, and there are still unmet needs for G6PD testing to early screen neonates. The existing G6PD screening methods usually require multiple steps of manual operation. The results of these methods are often impacted by the variability or errors in manual operation. Therefore, they are difficult to accurately identify the population with G6PD mutation. This study evaluated the performance of a novel fully-automated G6PD/Hb detection method (G6PDH), and compared its diagnostic value with other methods, so as to provide a more precise technical means for the early screening and diagnosis of the disease. Methods In this study, the automatic lysis mode of Mindray BS-2800M analyzer was used to realize the G6PD/Hb twin-tests in parallel, in which G6PD and Hb (hemoglobin) were detected simultaneously using the same blood sample, and the G6PD/Hb ratio was calculated, defined as G6PDH. The age and gender specific reference intervals with this method were established. Based on the results of Multiplex Melting Curve Analysis (MMCA, a genetic mutation detecting method), the diagnostic efficacy and accordance rate of G6PDH and other biochemical methods such as G6PD/6PGD, G6PD single enzyme method were analyzed. Results According to the guidance of WHO, the reference intervals of G6PDH in non-neonates were established as <2.31, =2.31, 2.31∼6.17, =6.17 for deficient males/females, normal males, intermediate females, and normal females. For neonates, they were <4.14, =4.14, 4.14∼11.03, =11.03, respectively. Compared with the results of MMCA method on 185 samples, the sensitivity and accuracy of the G6PDH method were 93.5% and 91.7% respectively, which were significantly higher than those of G6PD/6PGD method (74.0%, 74.4%) and G6PD single enzyme method (68.3%, 67.8%). The Youden index of G6PDH method was 0.81, higher than that of 0.74 and 0.63 by other two methods, respectively. And the missed diagnosis rate was 6.5%, lower than that of the other two methods (26.0%, 31.7%). Moreover, in 64 female patients with heterozygous mutation, the diagnose accordance rate of G6PDH was 87.5%, while the other two was 51.6% and 39.1%. Conclusion Mindray provides an innovative automated G6PDH method on BS-2800M to accurately identify G6PD deficiency population, and significantly reduces the missed diagnosis rate of high-risk population with G6PD deficiency, especially for female heterozygous mutation. The G6PDH method could be well used for the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of G6PD deficiency, and could be considered as the preferred method in clinical laboratory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.093\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶(G6PD)检测用于诊断G6PD缺乏症。世界卫生组织(WHO)建议,应确定个体的G6PD状态,以指导抗疟疾药物的剂量和持续时间,而G6PD检测对早期筛查新生儿的需求仍未得到满足。现有的G6PD筛选方法通常需要多个步骤的人工操作。这些方法的结果经常受到人工操作的可变性或错误的影响。因此,很难准确识别G6PD突变人群。本研究对一种新型全自动G6PD/Hb检测方法(G6PDH)的性能进行评价,并将其与其他方法的诊断价值进行比较,为疾病的早期筛查和诊断提供更精确的技术手段。方法本研究采用迈瑞BS-2800M分析仪自动裂解模式,对同一血样同时检测G6PD和Hb(血红蛋白),计算G6PD/Hb比值,定义为G6PDH。用该方法建立了年龄和性别的参考区间。基于基因突变检测方法MMCA (multiple Melting Curve Analysis)的结果,分析G6PDH与G6PD/6PGD、G6PD单酶法等其他生化方法的诊断效能和符合率。结果根据WHO的指导,非新生儿G6PDH的参考区间分别为&;lt;2.31, =2.31, 2.31 ~ 6.17,正常男性、中等女性和正常女性的G6PDH参考区间分别为2.31 ~ 6.17。新生儿为4.14,=4.14,4.14 ~ 11.03,=11.03。与MMCA法测定185份样品的结果比较,G6PDH法的灵敏度和准确度分别为93.5%和91.7%,显著高于G6PD/6PGD法(74.0%、74.4%)和G6PD单酶法(68.3%、67.8%)。G6PDH法的约登指数为0.81,高于其他两种方法的约登指数0.74和0.63。漏诊率为6.5%,低于其他两种方法(26.0%、31.7%)。64例女性杂合突变患者中,G6PDH诊断符合率为87.5%,其他2例分别为51.6%和39.1%。结论迈瑞在BS-2800M上提供了一种创新的自动化G6PDH方法,能够准确识别G6PD缺陷人群,显著降低G6PD缺陷高危人群,尤其是女性杂合突变的漏诊率。G6PDH法可很好地用于G6PD缺乏症的筛查、诊断和监测,可作为临床实验室的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A-094 Mindray G6PDH –An Efficient and Accurate Method for Identifying G6PD Deficiency Population
Background Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing is used for diagnosis of G6PD deficiency. World Health Organization (WHO) advises that an individual’s G6PD status should be determined to guide dose and duration of anti-malarial drugs, and there are still unmet needs for G6PD testing to early screen neonates. The existing G6PD screening methods usually require multiple steps of manual operation. The results of these methods are often impacted by the variability or errors in manual operation. Therefore, they are difficult to accurately identify the population with G6PD mutation. This study evaluated the performance of a novel fully-automated G6PD/Hb detection method (G6PDH), and compared its diagnostic value with other methods, so as to provide a more precise technical means for the early screening and diagnosis of the disease. Methods In this study, the automatic lysis mode of Mindray BS-2800M analyzer was used to realize the G6PD/Hb twin-tests in parallel, in which G6PD and Hb (hemoglobin) were detected simultaneously using the same blood sample, and the G6PD/Hb ratio was calculated, defined as G6PDH. The age and gender specific reference intervals with this method were established. Based on the results of Multiplex Melting Curve Analysis (MMCA, a genetic mutation detecting method), the diagnostic efficacy and accordance rate of G6PDH and other biochemical methods such as G6PD/6PGD, G6PD single enzyme method were analyzed. Results According to the guidance of WHO, the reference intervals of G6PDH in non-neonates were established as <2.31, =2.31, 2.31∼6.17, =6.17 for deficient males/females, normal males, intermediate females, and normal females. For neonates, they were <4.14, =4.14, 4.14∼11.03, =11.03, respectively. Compared with the results of MMCA method on 185 samples, the sensitivity and accuracy of the G6PDH method were 93.5% and 91.7% respectively, which were significantly higher than those of G6PD/6PGD method (74.0%, 74.4%) and G6PD single enzyme method (68.3%, 67.8%). The Youden index of G6PDH method was 0.81, higher than that of 0.74 and 0.63 by other two methods, respectively. And the missed diagnosis rate was 6.5%, lower than that of the other two methods (26.0%, 31.7%). Moreover, in 64 female patients with heterozygous mutation, the diagnose accordance rate of G6PDH was 87.5%, while the other two was 51.6% and 39.1%. Conclusion Mindray provides an innovative automated G6PDH method on BS-2800M to accurately identify G6PD deficiency population, and significantly reduces the missed diagnosis rate of high-risk population with G6PD deficiency, especially for female heterozygous mutation. The G6PDH method could be well used for the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of G6PD deficiency, and could be considered as the preferred method in clinical laboratory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信