A-116混合:打捞冷冻标本

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Ximena Wise, Nicholas Evans, Clovis Sarmiento, Hong-Kee Lee, Robert Benirschke
{"title":"A-116混合:打捞冷冻标本","authors":"Ximena Wise, Nicholas Evans, Clovis Sarmiento, Hong-Kee Lee, Robert Benirschke","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Proper specimen collection is necessary to minimize pre-analytical errors. Analyte stability after freezing is often provided with FDA approvals but is done on an aliquot instead of in the specimen collection container. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of freezing due to improper storage and/or transport on serum and plasma analytes from centrifuged and gel-separated samples. We investigate whether mixing thawed specimens can salvage the sample, preventing unnecessary patient re-draws and reducing laboratory costs. Methods Thirty fresh plasma and serum specimens that were not required for clinical care were randomly chosen. Baseline values for TSH, vitamin B12, vitamin D3, total PSA and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) were collected. Specimens were frozen at -20? C for 24 hours, mimicking the winter conditions in outpatient pickup boxes. Specimens were then thawed at room temperature for 90-120 minutes and re-tested. Then, they were recapped and gently mixed for 10 minutes and re-tested a third time. CLIA, CAP and RCPA total allowable error (TAE) guidelines were utilized to assess whether or not a significant change occurred, in at least one sample, between the baseline and mixed values. Additionally, the data were analyzed using both male and female reference intervals to see if the clinical interpretations changed significantly within our laboratory (>10% of samples affected). Results Both serum and plasma specimens were affected significantly when assessed by either TAE and/or reference range standards. For the frozen, non-mixed plasma samples, the majority of the analytes (14/18, 78%)—except TPSA, Vitamin B12, TSH, and Alkaline Phosphatase—were outside TAE standards. However, upon mixing, eight of these analytes corrected themselves, leaving only six analytes (Potassium, Glucose, Total Bilirubin, Bicarbonate, AST and ALT) in the out-of-range category. Three analytes (AST, Bicarbonate, and Potassium, 18%) were altered when using the female reference intervals. Whereas when using the male reference intervals, Bicarbonate, Potassium, and TPSA had alterations in interpretation (17%). Regarding the serum samples, all of the analytes in the frozen, non-mixed specimens (18/18, 100%) were out of range per TAE standards. After mixing, only eight of the analytes (8/18, 44%) had fallen back within range. Regarding a change in clinical interpretation, five analytes (Bicarbonate, Chloride, Potassium, Sodium, and Vitamin D, 29%) were altered when using the female reference intervals, whereas when using the male values, a total of 6 analytes (aforementioned plus Creatinine, 33% of specimens) had changes in interpretation. Conclusion Real-world conditions may create pre-analytical errors that impact analyte results and must be considered. Importantly, this study showed that despite an analyte being stable per the FDA approval on an aliquot, this was not always the case in the specimen collection container. Plasma samples were generally more stable than serum samples, but both had clinically significant changes. These findings have the potential to impact patient care significantly and suggest that manufacturers should be required to provide freeze-thaw stability in approved specimen containers.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A-116 Mixing it up: Salvaging frozen specimens\",\"authors\":\"Ximena Wise, Nicholas Evans, Clovis Sarmiento, Hong-Kee Lee, Robert Benirschke\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Proper specimen collection is necessary to minimize pre-analytical errors. Analyte stability after freezing is often provided with FDA approvals but is done on an aliquot instead of in the specimen collection container. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of freezing due to improper storage and/or transport on serum and plasma analytes from centrifuged and gel-separated samples. We investigate whether mixing thawed specimens can salvage the sample, preventing unnecessary patient re-draws and reducing laboratory costs. Methods Thirty fresh plasma and serum specimens that were not required for clinical care were randomly chosen. Baseline values for TSH, vitamin B12, vitamin D3, total PSA and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) were collected. Specimens were frozen at -20? C for 24 hours, mimicking the winter conditions in outpatient pickup boxes. Specimens were then thawed at room temperature for 90-120 minutes and re-tested. Then, they were recapped and gently mixed for 10 minutes and re-tested a third time. CLIA, CAP and RCPA total allowable error (TAE) guidelines were utilized to assess whether or not a significant change occurred, in at least one sample, between the baseline and mixed values. Additionally, the data were analyzed using both male and female reference intervals to see if the clinical interpretations changed significantly within our laboratory (>10% of samples affected). Results Both serum and plasma specimens were affected significantly when assessed by either TAE and/or reference range standards. For the frozen, non-mixed plasma samples, the majority of the analytes (14/18, 78%)—except TPSA, Vitamin B12, TSH, and Alkaline Phosphatase—were outside TAE standards. However, upon mixing, eight of these analytes corrected themselves, leaving only six analytes (Potassium, Glucose, Total Bilirubin, Bicarbonate, AST and ALT) in the out-of-range category. Three analytes (AST, Bicarbonate, and Potassium, 18%) were altered when using the female reference intervals. Whereas when using the male reference intervals, Bicarbonate, Potassium, and TPSA had alterations in interpretation (17%). Regarding the serum samples, all of the analytes in the frozen, non-mixed specimens (18/18, 100%) were out of range per TAE standards. After mixing, only eight of the analytes (8/18, 44%) had fallen back within range. Regarding a change in clinical interpretation, five analytes (Bicarbonate, Chloride, Potassium, Sodium, and Vitamin D, 29%) were altered when using the female reference intervals, whereas when using the male values, a total of 6 analytes (aforementioned plus Creatinine, 33% of specimens) had changes in interpretation. Conclusion Real-world conditions may create pre-analytical errors that impact analyte results and must be considered. Importantly, this study showed that despite an analyte being stable per the FDA approval on an aliquot, this was not always the case in the specimen collection container. Plasma samples were generally more stable than serum samples, but both had clinically significant changes. These findings have the potential to impact patient care significantly and suggest that manufacturers should be required to provide freeze-thaw stability in approved specimen containers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.114\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf086.114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

适当的标本采集是必要的,以尽量减少分析前的误差。分析物冷冻后的稳定性通常有FDA批准,但在等分物上而不是在标本收集容器中进行。本研究的目的是检查由于不适当的储存和/或运输而导致的冷冻对离心和凝胶分离样品的血清和血浆分析物的影响。我们研究混合解冻标本是否可以挽救样本,防止不必要的患者重新抽取并降低实验室成本。方法随机抽取临床不需要的新鲜血浆和血清标本30份。收集TSH、维生素B12、维生素D3、总PSA和综合代谢指数(CMP)的基线值。标本在-20℃下冷冻。24小时,模拟门诊拾取箱的冬季条件。然后在室温下解冻90-120分钟,重新测试。然后,将它们重新盖上,轻轻混合10分钟,再进行第三次测试。使用CLIA, CAP和RCPA总允许误差(TAE)指南来评估基线值和混合值之间是否发生了重大变化,至少在一个样本中。此外,使用男性和女性参考区间对数据进行分析,以查看我们实验室的临床解释是否发生了显着变化(10%的样本受影响)。结果血清和血浆标本均受到TAE和/或参考范围标准的显著影响。对于冷冻、非混合血浆样品,除TPSA、维生素B12、TSH和碱性磷酸酶外,大多数分析物(14/ 18,78 %)不符合TAE标准。然而,在混合后,这些分析物中的八种自我纠正,只留下六种分析物(钾,葡萄糖,总胆红素,碳酸氢盐,AST和ALT)在超出范围的类别。当使用女性参考区间时,三种分析物(AST,碳酸氢盐和钾,18%)被改变。然而,当使用男性参考区间时,碳酸氢盐、钾和TPSA的解释发生了变化(17%)。对于血清样本,冷冻、非混合标本(18/18,100%)的分析物均超出TAE标准的范围。混合后,只有8个分析物(8/18,44%)回落到范围内。关于临床解释的变化,当使用女性参考区间时,五种分析物(碳酸氢盐、氯化物、钾、钠和维生素D,占29%)发生了变化,而当使用男性值时,共有6种分析物(上述加肌酐,占标本的33%)发生了解释变化。结论:实际条件可能会产生分析前误差,影响分析结果,必须予以考虑。重要的是,这项研究表明,尽管分析物在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的等分物中是稳定的,但在标本收集容器中并不总是如此。血浆样本通常比血清样本更稳定,但两者都有显著的临床变化。这些发现有可能对患者护理产生重大影响,并建议制造商应要求在批准的标本容器中提供冻融稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A-116 Mixing it up: Salvaging frozen specimens
Background Proper specimen collection is necessary to minimize pre-analytical errors. Analyte stability after freezing is often provided with FDA approvals but is done on an aliquot instead of in the specimen collection container. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of freezing due to improper storage and/or transport on serum and plasma analytes from centrifuged and gel-separated samples. We investigate whether mixing thawed specimens can salvage the sample, preventing unnecessary patient re-draws and reducing laboratory costs. Methods Thirty fresh plasma and serum specimens that were not required for clinical care were randomly chosen. Baseline values for TSH, vitamin B12, vitamin D3, total PSA and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) were collected. Specimens were frozen at -20? C for 24 hours, mimicking the winter conditions in outpatient pickup boxes. Specimens were then thawed at room temperature for 90-120 minutes and re-tested. Then, they were recapped and gently mixed for 10 minutes and re-tested a third time. CLIA, CAP and RCPA total allowable error (TAE) guidelines were utilized to assess whether or not a significant change occurred, in at least one sample, between the baseline and mixed values. Additionally, the data were analyzed using both male and female reference intervals to see if the clinical interpretations changed significantly within our laboratory (>10% of samples affected). Results Both serum and plasma specimens were affected significantly when assessed by either TAE and/or reference range standards. For the frozen, non-mixed plasma samples, the majority of the analytes (14/18, 78%)—except TPSA, Vitamin B12, TSH, and Alkaline Phosphatase—were outside TAE standards. However, upon mixing, eight of these analytes corrected themselves, leaving only six analytes (Potassium, Glucose, Total Bilirubin, Bicarbonate, AST and ALT) in the out-of-range category. Three analytes (AST, Bicarbonate, and Potassium, 18%) were altered when using the female reference intervals. Whereas when using the male reference intervals, Bicarbonate, Potassium, and TPSA had alterations in interpretation (17%). Regarding the serum samples, all of the analytes in the frozen, non-mixed specimens (18/18, 100%) were out of range per TAE standards. After mixing, only eight of the analytes (8/18, 44%) had fallen back within range. Regarding a change in clinical interpretation, five analytes (Bicarbonate, Chloride, Potassium, Sodium, and Vitamin D, 29%) were altered when using the female reference intervals, whereas when using the male values, a total of 6 analytes (aforementioned plus Creatinine, 33% of specimens) had changes in interpretation. Conclusion Real-world conditions may create pre-analytical errors that impact analyte results and must be considered. Importantly, this study showed that despite an analyte being stable per the FDA approval on an aliquot, this was not always the case in the specimen collection container. Plasma samples were generally more stable than serum samples, but both had clinically significant changes. These findings have the potential to impact patient care significantly and suggest that manufacturers should be required to provide freeze-thaw stability in approved specimen containers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信