Ahmad Z Al Meslamani, Anan S Jarab, Abdullah Elrefae
{"title":"2型高哮喘治疗的进展:还缺少什么?","authors":"Ahmad Z Al Meslamani, Anan S Jarab, Abdullah Elrefae","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2025.2569844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type 2-high asthma (T2HA) accounts for most severe asthma morbidity and is driven by eosinophilic, IgE- and alarmin-mediated inflammation. Although five biologics are licensed, many patients remain symptomatic, corticosteroid-dependent or financially excluded.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EconLit, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO-ICTRP were searched (1 January 2005 - 30 June 2025). Evidence from randomized trials, economic evaluations and translational studies on biologics, small-molecule drugs, cell-based and microbiome-directed interventions was synthesized across four domains: late-stage attrition, ultra-long-acting biologic limitations, slow small-molecule progress, and cost - access barriers. Durability, pediatric data and OCS-sparing potential were also examined.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Phenotype-guided biologics have replaced corticosteroid escalation after two decades of research; nevertheless, plateaus in effectiveness, uncertain long-term safety profiles, and exorbitant costs persist. Future progress will depend on value-based pricing that facilitates global adoption, adaptive biomarker-anchored clinical trials, rational combination or bispecific therapeutics, and rigorous post-marketing surveillance of cell-based and microbiome-directed therapies. Delivering sustainable, equitable management of T2HA necessitates the coordination of scientific, regulatory, and economic mechanisms rather than focusing on increasingly narrow cytokine targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in type 2-high asthma therapy: what remains missing?\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Z Al Meslamani, Anan S Jarab, Abdullah Elrefae\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17476348.2025.2569844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type 2-high asthma (T2HA) accounts for most severe asthma morbidity and is driven by eosinophilic, IgE- and alarmin-mediated inflammation. Although five biologics are licensed, many patients remain symptomatic, corticosteroid-dependent or financially excluded.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EconLit, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO-ICTRP were searched (1 January 2005 - 30 June 2025). Evidence from randomized trials, economic evaluations and translational studies on biologics, small-molecule drugs, cell-based and microbiome-directed interventions was synthesized across four domains: late-stage attrition, ultra-long-acting biologic limitations, slow small-molecule progress, and cost - access barriers. Durability, pediatric data and OCS-sparing potential were also examined.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Phenotype-guided biologics have replaced corticosteroid escalation after two decades of research; nevertheless, plateaus in effectiveness, uncertain long-term safety profiles, and exorbitant costs persist. Future progress will depend on value-based pricing that facilitates global adoption, adaptive biomarker-anchored clinical trials, rational combination or bispecific therapeutics, and rigorous post-marketing surveillance of cell-based and microbiome-directed therapies. Delivering sustainable, equitable management of T2HA necessitates the coordination of scientific, regulatory, and economic mechanisms rather than focusing on increasingly narrow cytokine targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2025.2569844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2025.2569844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2型高哮喘(T2HA)是最严重的哮喘发病率,由嗜酸性粒细胞、IgE和警报蛋白介导的炎症驱动。虽然有五种生物制剂获得许可,但许多患者仍然有症状,依赖皮质类固醇或经济上被排除在外。检索领域:PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane Library、EconLit、ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO-ICTRP(2005年1月1日至2025年6月30日)。来自随机试验、经济评估和生物制剂、小分子药物、细胞和微生物组导向干预的转化研究的证据综合了四个领域:后期消耗、超长效生物限制、小分子进展缓慢和成本获取障碍。耐久性,儿童数据和ocs保留潜力也进行了检查。专家意见:经过二十年的研究,表型导向的生物制剂已经取代了皮质类固醇;然而,有效性停滞、不确定的长期安全性以及高昂的成本仍然存在。未来的进展将取决于促进全球采用的基于价值的定价、基于生物标志物的适应性临床试验、合理组合或双特异性治疗,以及对基于细胞和微生物组的治疗进行严格的上市后监督。提供可持续、公平的T2HA管理需要科学、监管和经济机制的协调,而不是专注于日益狭窄的细胞因子目标。
Advances in type 2-high asthma therapy: what remains missing?
Introduction: Type 2-high asthma (T2HA) accounts for most severe asthma morbidity and is driven by eosinophilic, IgE- and alarmin-mediated inflammation. Although five biologics are licensed, many patients remain symptomatic, corticosteroid-dependent or financially excluded.
Areas covered: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EconLit, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO-ICTRP were searched (1 January 2005 - 30 June 2025). Evidence from randomized trials, economic evaluations and translational studies on biologics, small-molecule drugs, cell-based and microbiome-directed interventions was synthesized across four domains: late-stage attrition, ultra-long-acting biologic limitations, slow small-molecule progress, and cost - access barriers. Durability, pediatric data and OCS-sparing potential were also examined.
Expert opinion: Phenotype-guided biologics have replaced corticosteroid escalation after two decades of research; nevertheless, plateaus in effectiveness, uncertain long-term safety profiles, and exorbitant costs persist. Future progress will depend on value-based pricing that facilitates global adoption, adaptive biomarker-anchored clinical trials, rational combination or bispecific therapeutics, and rigorous post-marketing surveillance of cell-based and microbiome-directed therapies. Delivering sustainable, equitable management of T2HA necessitates the coordination of scientific, regulatory, and economic mechanisms rather than focusing on increasingly narrow cytokine targets.