了解在为医疗补助受益人服务的诊所中筛查不良儿童经历的轨迹。

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01
Priya Gandhi, Joshua Breslau, Ryan K McBain, Jonathan S Levin, Avah Mousavi, Elizabeth Roth, Megan S Schuler, Ben Senator, Danielle Schlang, Nicole K Eberhart
{"title":"了解在为医疗补助受益人服务的诊所中筛查不良儿童经历的轨迹。","authors":"Priya Gandhi, Joshua Breslau, Ryan K McBain, Jonathan S Levin, Avah Mousavi, Elizabeth Roth, Megan S Schuler, Ben Senator, Danielle Schlang, Nicole K Eberhart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In January 2020, Medi-Cal began reimbursing clinics for screening for and responding to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) as part of an effort to promote trauma-informed health care (TIHC). Since that time, ACE screening and response has grown rapidly, but unevenly, across primary care clinics across the state. In this evaluation, the authors examine factors that have contributed to variation in ACE screening rates across clinics that serve Medi-Cal beneficiaries. By improving understanding of the reasons clinics differ in screening practices, the authors aim to help tailor and target efforts to promote continued growth in TIHC. This evaluation had two interrelated components. First, the authors used Medi-Cal claims data on screening-related reimbursements to identify groups of clinics with different screening trajectories. Second, they conducted qualitative interviews with clinic representatives in each of those trajectory groups about the factors that influenced their screening practices. Clinics were selected to ensure diversity with respect to region of the state, rural versus non-rural locations, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) versus private clinics, and clinics with versus without pediatric providers. Screening was found to vary based on clinic location and the presence of a pediatric provider. Common barriers to screening included lack of awareness and concerns about the availability of referral resources. The authors make recommendations, based on their findings, for actions that address barriers to screening and TIHC for pediatric and adult primary care clinics serving Medi-Cal beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"12 4","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Trajectories of Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Clinics Serving Medi-Cal Beneficiaries.\",\"authors\":\"Priya Gandhi, Joshua Breslau, Ryan K McBain, Jonathan S Levin, Avah Mousavi, Elizabeth Roth, Megan S Schuler, Ben Senator, Danielle Schlang, Nicole K Eberhart\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In January 2020, Medi-Cal began reimbursing clinics for screening for and responding to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) as part of an effort to promote trauma-informed health care (TIHC). Since that time, ACE screening and response has grown rapidly, but unevenly, across primary care clinics across the state. In this evaluation, the authors examine factors that have contributed to variation in ACE screening rates across clinics that serve Medi-Cal beneficiaries. By improving understanding of the reasons clinics differ in screening practices, the authors aim to help tailor and target efforts to promote continued growth in TIHC. This evaluation had two interrelated components. First, the authors used Medi-Cal claims data on screening-related reimbursements to identify groups of clinics with different screening trajectories. Second, they conducted qualitative interviews with clinic representatives in each of those trajectory groups about the factors that influenced their screening practices. Clinics were selected to ensure diversity with respect to region of the state, rural versus non-rural locations, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) versus private clinics, and clinics with versus without pediatric providers. Screening was found to vary based on clinic location and the presence of a pediatric provider. Common barriers to screening included lack of awareness and concerns about the availability of referral resources. The authors make recommendations, based on their findings, for actions that address barriers to screening and TIHC for pediatric and adult primary care clinics serving Medi-Cal beneficiaries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rand health quarterly\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rand health quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年1月,作为促进创伤知情医疗保健(TIHC)努力的一部分,Medi-Cal开始为筛查和应对不良童年经历(ace)的诊所提供报销。从那时起,ACE的筛查和反应迅速增长,但在全州的初级保健诊所中并不均衡。在这项评估中,作者研究了在为加州医保受益人服务的诊所中导致ACE筛查率变化的因素。通过提高对诊所在筛查实践中存在差异的原因的理解,作者旨在帮助定制和有针对性的努力,以促进TIHC的持续增长。这项评价有两个相互关联的组成部分。首先,作者使用Medi-Cal关于筛查相关报销的索赔数据来识别具有不同筛查轨迹的诊所组。其次,他们对每个轨迹组的诊所代表进行了定性访谈,了解影响他们筛查实践的因素。选择诊所是为了确保不同地区、农村与非农村地区、联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)与私人诊所、有儿科服务提供者与没有儿科服务提供者的诊所的多样性。发现筛查根据诊所位置和儿科提供者的存在而有所不同。筛查的常见障碍包括缺乏认识和对转诊资源的可用性的担忧。根据他们的发现,作者提出了建议,针对为医疗保险受益人服务的儿科和成人初级保健诊所的筛查和TIHC障碍采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Trajectories of Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Clinics Serving Medi-Cal Beneficiaries.

In January 2020, Medi-Cal began reimbursing clinics for screening for and responding to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) as part of an effort to promote trauma-informed health care (TIHC). Since that time, ACE screening and response has grown rapidly, but unevenly, across primary care clinics across the state. In this evaluation, the authors examine factors that have contributed to variation in ACE screening rates across clinics that serve Medi-Cal beneficiaries. By improving understanding of the reasons clinics differ in screening practices, the authors aim to help tailor and target efforts to promote continued growth in TIHC. This evaluation had two interrelated components. First, the authors used Medi-Cal claims data on screening-related reimbursements to identify groups of clinics with different screening trajectories. Second, they conducted qualitative interviews with clinic representatives in each of those trajectory groups about the factors that influenced their screening practices. Clinics were selected to ensure diversity with respect to region of the state, rural versus non-rural locations, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) versus private clinics, and clinics with versus without pediatric providers. Screening was found to vary based on clinic location and the presence of a pediatric provider. Common barriers to screening included lack of awareness and concerns about the availability of referral resources. The authors make recommendations, based on their findings, for actions that address barriers to screening and TIHC for pediatric and adult primary care clinics serving Medi-Cal beneficiaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信