精神病学预先指示:证据回顾。

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01
Alejandro Roa Contreras, Skye A Miner, Melissa Louise Harris-Gersten, Daniel Siconolfi, Nicole K Eberhart
{"title":"精神病学预先指示:证据回顾。","authors":"Alejandro Roa Contreras, Skye A Miner, Melissa Louise Harris-Gersten, Daniel Siconolfi, Nicole K Eberhart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) offer individuals with psychiatric conditions the opportunity to document their preferences for treatment and interactions during a mental health crisis before that crisis occurs. In completing a PAD, individuals are encouraged to identify and document their preferences for medication management, setting of care, points of contact, a decisionmaking surrogate, and ways of interacting with emergency response and health care teams. Although PADs have grown in popularity and their legality has been increasingly recognized in international contexts and among individual U.S. states, evidence regarding their use is not well synthesized or documented. In this environmental scan, the authors take a broad approach that combines evidence from systematic reviews, primary empirical literature, and grey literature to better understand the state of the evidence regarding implementing PADs in community, inpatient, and outpatient contexts. The authors sought to identify the potential and realized benefits of PADs, the barriers to the adoption and implementation of PADs, and promising practices for PAD implementation. This study summarizes those findings and can help inform future efforts to develop and implement PADs. Overall, PADs are a promising tool to improve care for individuals with serious mental illness; however, implementation requires clear legal guidance and clinician buy-in to ensure the effectiveness of PADs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"12 4","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychiatric Advance Directives: A Review of the Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Roa Contreras, Skye A Miner, Melissa Louise Harris-Gersten, Daniel Siconolfi, Nicole K Eberhart\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) offer individuals with psychiatric conditions the opportunity to document their preferences for treatment and interactions during a mental health crisis before that crisis occurs. In completing a PAD, individuals are encouraged to identify and document their preferences for medication management, setting of care, points of contact, a decisionmaking surrogate, and ways of interacting with emergency response and health care teams. Although PADs have grown in popularity and their legality has been increasingly recognized in international contexts and among individual U.S. states, evidence regarding their use is not well synthesized or documented. In this environmental scan, the authors take a broad approach that combines evidence from systematic reviews, primary empirical literature, and grey literature to better understand the state of the evidence regarding implementing PADs in community, inpatient, and outpatient contexts. The authors sought to identify the potential and realized benefits of PADs, the barriers to the adoption and implementation of PADs, and promising practices for PAD implementation. This study summarizes those findings and can help inform future efforts to develop and implement PADs. Overall, PADs are a promising tool to improve care for individuals with serious mental illness; however, implementation requires clear legal guidance and clinician buy-in to ensure the effectiveness of PADs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rand health quarterly\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rand health quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神病学预先指示(pad)为患有精神疾病的个人提供了在精神健康危机发生之前记录他们对治疗的偏好和相互作用的机会。在完成PAD时,鼓励个人确定并记录他们对药物管理、护理设置、联络点、决策代理以及与应急反应和卫生保健团队互动的方式的偏好。尽管PADs越来越受欢迎,其合法性也在国际环境和美国各州得到越来越多的认可,但有关其使用的证据并没有很好地合成或记录。在这次环境扫描中,作者采用了一种广泛的方法,结合了系统综述、主要经验文献和灰色文献的证据,以更好地了解在社区、住院和门诊环境中实施pad的证据状况。作者试图确定PAD的潜在和实现的好处,采用和实现PAD的障碍,以及PAD实现的有希望的实践。本研究总结了这些发现,可以为今后开发和实施pad提供信息。总的来说,pad是一种很有前途的工具,可以改善对严重精神疾病患者的护理;然而,实施需要明确的法律指导和临床医生的支持,以确保PADs的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychiatric Advance Directives: A Review of the Evidence.

Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) offer individuals with psychiatric conditions the opportunity to document their preferences for treatment and interactions during a mental health crisis before that crisis occurs. In completing a PAD, individuals are encouraged to identify and document their preferences for medication management, setting of care, points of contact, a decisionmaking surrogate, and ways of interacting with emergency response and health care teams. Although PADs have grown in popularity and their legality has been increasingly recognized in international contexts and among individual U.S. states, evidence regarding their use is not well synthesized or documented. In this environmental scan, the authors take a broad approach that combines evidence from systematic reviews, primary empirical literature, and grey literature to better understand the state of the evidence regarding implementing PADs in community, inpatient, and outpatient contexts. The authors sought to identify the potential and realized benefits of PADs, the barriers to the adoption and implementation of PADs, and promising practices for PAD implementation. This study summarizes those findings and can help inform future efforts to develop and implement PADs. Overall, PADs are a promising tool to improve care for individuals with serious mental illness; however, implementation requires clear legal guidance and clinician buy-in to ensure the effectiveness of PADs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信