正畸伪装治疗ⅱ类病例中门牙位置目标为有利侧位。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 Dentistry
Yanting Wu, Li Mei, Nanxi Zhu, Ehab A Abdulghani, Xinlianyi Zhou, Wei Zheng, Yu Li
{"title":"正畸伪装治疗ⅱ类病例中门牙位置目标为有利侧位。","authors":"Yanting Wu, Li Mei, Nanxi Zhu, Ehab A Abdulghani, Xinlianyi Zhou, Wei Zheng, Yu Li","doi":"10.1186/s40510-025-00582-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to screen favorable and unfavorable profile outcomes in orthodontic camouflage treatment of skeletal Class II cases, based on which to identify the reference line and the associated value for the optimal incisor position objective (IPO) in such cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 Chinese adult skeletal Class II cases were included, who finished orthodontic camouflage treatment with anterior retraction following premolars extraction. Post-treatment lateral cephalograms were trimmed and converted into silhouettes, rated by a panel of orthodontists. The top 30% and bottom 30% ranked cases were included as the favorable and unfavorable profile group respectively. The distances of U1 anterior to the GALL line (U1-GALL), point A vertical (U1-Av), and ANS-Pog line (U1-ANPo) were measured as IPO indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>U1-ANPo in the favorable profile group was 4.74 ± 1.65 mm, significantly different from that in the unfavorable profile group (6.02 ± 3.61 mm). U1-GALL was -2.68 ± 2.30 mm and -1.12 ± 2.02 mm, and U1-Av was 4.49 ± 3.97 mm and 6.22 ± 4.42 mm, in the favorable and unfavorable profile group respectively, neither showing significant difference. Among three indicators, only U1-ANPo had a significant discriminatory capacity (AUC = 0.74, P = 0.007) for differentiating between the favorable and unfavorable profile group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In skeletal Class II orthodontic camouflage treatment, the relatively favorable post-treatment profiles are associated with the U1 position anterior to the ANS-Pog line. U1-ANPo of around 4.7 mm could be tentatively proposed as a practical IPO reference in treatment planning for such cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":56071,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Orthodontics","volume":"26 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incisor position objective for favorable profile in orthodontic camouflage treatment of skeletal class II cases.\",\"authors\":\"Yanting Wu, Li Mei, Nanxi Zhu, Ehab A Abdulghani, Xinlianyi Zhou, Wei Zheng, Yu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40510-025-00582-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to screen favorable and unfavorable profile outcomes in orthodontic camouflage treatment of skeletal Class II cases, based on which to identify the reference line and the associated value for the optimal incisor position objective (IPO) in such cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 Chinese adult skeletal Class II cases were included, who finished orthodontic camouflage treatment with anterior retraction following premolars extraction. Post-treatment lateral cephalograms were trimmed and converted into silhouettes, rated by a panel of orthodontists. The top 30% and bottom 30% ranked cases were included as the favorable and unfavorable profile group respectively. The distances of U1 anterior to the GALL line (U1-GALL), point A vertical (U1-Av), and ANS-Pog line (U1-ANPo) were measured as IPO indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>U1-ANPo in the favorable profile group was 4.74 ± 1.65 mm, significantly different from that in the unfavorable profile group (6.02 ± 3.61 mm). U1-GALL was -2.68 ± 2.30 mm and -1.12 ± 2.02 mm, and U1-Av was 4.49 ± 3.97 mm and 6.22 ± 4.42 mm, in the favorable and unfavorable profile group respectively, neither showing significant difference. Among three indicators, only U1-ANPo had a significant discriminatory capacity (AUC = 0.74, P = 0.007) for differentiating between the favorable and unfavorable profile group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In skeletal Class II orthodontic camouflage treatment, the relatively favorable post-treatment profiles are associated with the U1 position anterior to the ANS-Pog line. U1-ANPo of around 4.7 mm could be tentatively proposed as a practical IPO reference in treatment planning for such cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00582-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00582-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在筛选骨骼ⅱ类病例正畸伪装治疗的有利和不利的侧位结果,在此基础上确定此类病例中最佳门牙位置目标(IPO)的参考线和相关值。方法:选取140例中国成人骨骼ⅱ类病例,在前磨牙拔牙后进行前牙牵开正畸伪装治疗。治疗后的侧位脑电图被修剪并转换成剪影,由一组正畸医生评定。将排名前30%和排名后30%的病例分别作为有利和不利剖面组。测量U1前距GALL线(U1-GALL)、A垂直点(U1- av)和ANS-Pog线(U1- anpo)的距离作为IPO指标。结果:良好侧位组U1-ANPo为4.74±1.65 mm,与不良侧位组(6.02±3.61 mm)差异有统计学意义。有利侧位组和不利侧位组的U1-GALL分别为-2.68±2.30 mm和-1.12±2.02 mm, U1-Av分别为4.49±3.97 mm和6.22±4.42 mm,差异均无统计学意义。在3个指标中,只有U1-ANPo具有显著的区分能力(AUC = 0.74, P = 0.007)。结论:在骨骼II类正畸伪装治疗中,相对有利的治疗后轮廓与ANS-Pog线前的U1位置有关。4.7 mm左右的U1-ANPo可作为此类病例治疗计划的实用IPO参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Incisor position objective for favorable profile in orthodontic camouflage treatment of skeletal class II cases.

Incisor position objective for favorable profile in orthodontic camouflage treatment of skeletal class II cases.

Incisor position objective for favorable profile in orthodontic camouflage treatment of skeletal class II cases.

Incisor position objective for favorable profile in orthodontic camouflage treatment of skeletal class II cases.

Background: This study aimed to screen favorable and unfavorable profile outcomes in orthodontic camouflage treatment of skeletal Class II cases, based on which to identify the reference line and the associated value for the optimal incisor position objective (IPO) in such cases.

Methods: A total of 140 Chinese adult skeletal Class II cases were included, who finished orthodontic camouflage treatment with anterior retraction following premolars extraction. Post-treatment lateral cephalograms were trimmed and converted into silhouettes, rated by a panel of orthodontists. The top 30% and bottom 30% ranked cases were included as the favorable and unfavorable profile group respectively. The distances of U1 anterior to the GALL line (U1-GALL), point A vertical (U1-Av), and ANS-Pog line (U1-ANPo) were measured as IPO indicators.

Results: U1-ANPo in the favorable profile group was 4.74 ± 1.65 mm, significantly different from that in the unfavorable profile group (6.02 ± 3.61 mm). U1-GALL was -2.68 ± 2.30 mm and -1.12 ± 2.02 mm, and U1-Av was 4.49 ± 3.97 mm and 6.22 ± 4.42 mm, in the favorable and unfavorable profile group respectively, neither showing significant difference. Among three indicators, only U1-ANPo had a significant discriminatory capacity (AUC = 0.74, P = 0.007) for differentiating between the favorable and unfavorable profile group.

Conclusions: In skeletal Class II orthodontic camouflage treatment, the relatively favorable post-treatment profiles are associated with the U1 position anterior to the ANS-Pog line. U1-ANPo of around 4.7 mm could be tentatively proposed as a practical IPO reference in treatment planning for such cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Orthodontics
Progress in Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Orthodontics is a fully open access, international journal owned by the Italian Society of Orthodontics and published under the brand SpringerOpen. The Society is currently covering all publication costs so there are no article processing charges for authors. It is a premier journal of international scope that fosters orthodontic research, including both basic research and development of innovative clinical techniques, with an emphasis on the following areas: • Mechanisms to improve orthodontics • Clinical studies and control animal studies • Orthodontics and genetics, genomics • Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) control clinical trials • Efficacy of orthodontic appliances and animal models • Systematic reviews and meta analyses • Mechanisms to speed orthodontic treatment Progress in Orthodontics will consider for publication only meritorious and original contributions. These may be: • Original articles reporting the findings of clinical trials, clinically relevant basic scientific investigations, or novel therapeutic or diagnostic systems • Review articles on current topics • Articles on novel techniques and clinical tools • Articles of contemporary interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信