早期护理边缘家庭的社会心理干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Paula S Oliveira, Kyla Vaillancourt, Anna Giné Rabadán, Nazlı Akay, Pasco Fearon, Jane Barlow
{"title":"早期护理边缘家庭的社会心理干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Paula S Oliveira, Kyla Vaillancourt, Anna Giné Rabadán, Nazlı Akay, Pasco Fearon, Jane Barlow","doi":"10.1177/15248380251366259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the recognized need for early interventions to prevent maltreatment and family separation in families involved with child protection services (CPS), evidence for children aged 0 to 5 years remains scarce and inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered to these families in reducing the risk of harm, improving parenting quality, and supporting parental functioning. The review included families with children aged 0 to 5 years engaged with CPS and deemed at risk of entering the care system. A systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1990 to 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Meta-analyses used random effects models to estimate standardized mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR). Narrative synthesis was provided for outcomes not appropriate to include in meta-analyses. Fifteen RCTs (<i>n</i> = 2,232 families) were included. Interventions did not demonstrate consistent effects on reducing subsequent maltreatment, as measured by official records (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.75, 1.02]) or parent-reported risk of harm (SMD = -0.07, [-0.25, 0.11]). However, significant improvements were observed in parental sensitivity (SMD = 0.53, [0.30, 0.76]), attachment organization (OR = 2.17, [1.64, 2.87]), and parental functioning (SMD = -0.21, [-0.36, -0.06]). In conclusion, psychosocial interventions show promise in improving parenting among edge-of-care families but lack consistent evidence for reducing maltreatment risk. Future research should prioritize larger trials with standardized outcome measures to strengthen this evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380251366259"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychosocial Interventions for Edge of Care Families in the Early Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Paula S Oliveira, Kyla Vaillancourt, Anna Giné Rabadán, Nazlı Akay, Pasco Fearon, Jane Barlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248380251366259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the recognized need for early interventions to prevent maltreatment and family separation in families involved with child protection services (CPS), evidence for children aged 0 to 5 years remains scarce and inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered to these families in reducing the risk of harm, improving parenting quality, and supporting parental functioning. The review included families with children aged 0 to 5 years engaged with CPS and deemed at risk of entering the care system. A systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1990 to 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Meta-analyses used random effects models to estimate standardized mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR). Narrative synthesis was provided for outcomes not appropriate to include in meta-analyses. Fifteen RCTs (<i>n</i> = 2,232 families) were included. Interventions did not demonstrate consistent effects on reducing subsequent maltreatment, as measured by official records (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.75, 1.02]) or parent-reported risk of harm (SMD = -0.07, [-0.25, 0.11]). However, significant improvements were observed in parental sensitivity (SMD = 0.53, [0.30, 0.76]), attachment organization (OR = 2.17, [1.64, 2.87]), and parental functioning (SMD = -0.21, [-0.36, -0.06]). In conclusion, psychosocial interventions show promise in improving parenting among edge-of-care families but lack consistent evidence for reducing maltreatment risk. Future research should prioritize larger trials with standardized outcome measures to strengthen this evidence base.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248380251366259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251366259\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251366259","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们认识到需要采取早期干预措施,以防止涉及儿童保护服务(CPS)的家庭遭受虐待和家庭分离,但针对0至5岁儿童的证据仍然很少,而且尚无定论。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估提供给这些家庭的心理社会干预措施在降低伤害风险、提高养育质量和支持父母功能方面的有效性。这项调查包括了有0到5岁孩子的家庭,他们与CPS合作,被认为有进入护理系统的风险。对1990年至2024年的随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统检索(如PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO)。使用修订后的Cochrane风险偏倚工具评估符合条件的研究的偏倚风险。meta分析使用随机效应模型来估计标准化平均差异(SMD)或优势比(or)。对于不适合纳入元分析的结果,提供了叙述性综合。纳入15项随机对照试验(n = 2232个家庭)。根据官方记录(OR = 0.88, 95% CI[0.75, 1.02])或父母报告的伤害风险(SMD = -0.07,[-0.25, 0.11]),干预措施在减少随后的虐待方面没有表现出一致的效果。然而,在亲代敏感性(SMD = 0.53,[0.30, 0.76])、依恋组织(OR = 2.17,[1.64, 2.87])和亲代功能(SMD = -0.21,[-0.36, -0.06])方面均有显著改善。综上所述,社会心理干预有望改善处于护理边缘的家庭的养育方式,但缺乏降低虐待风险的一致证据。未来的研究应优先考虑采用标准化结果测量的大型试验,以加强这一证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychosocial Interventions for Edge of Care Families in the Early Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Despite the recognized need for early interventions to prevent maltreatment and family separation in families involved with child protection services (CPS), evidence for children aged 0 to 5 years remains scarce and inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions delivered to these families in reducing the risk of harm, improving parenting quality, and supporting parental functioning. The review included families with children aged 0 to 5 years engaged with CPS and deemed at risk of entering the care system. A systematic search of databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1990 to 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Meta-analyses used random effects models to estimate standardized mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR). Narrative synthesis was provided for outcomes not appropriate to include in meta-analyses. Fifteen RCTs (n = 2,232 families) were included. Interventions did not demonstrate consistent effects on reducing subsequent maltreatment, as measured by official records (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.75, 1.02]) or parent-reported risk of harm (SMD = -0.07, [-0.25, 0.11]). However, significant improvements were observed in parental sensitivity (SMD = 0.53, [0.30, 0.76]), attachment organization (OR = 2.17, [1.64, 2.87]), and parental functioning (SMD = -0.21, [-0.36, -0.06]). In conclusion, psychosocial interventions show promise in improving parenting among edge-of-care families but lack consistent evidence for reducing maltreatment risk. Future research should prioritize larger trials with standardized outcome measures to strengthen this evidence base.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信