{"title":"如何评估数字医疗的用户体验?虚拟现实应用中问卷调查的范围审查。","authors":"Francesca Bruni, Valentina Mancuso, Elisa Pedroli","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1561364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The exponential growth and integration of virtual reality technology in clinical environments necessitates a comprehensive user experience evaluation. This assessment is critical for clinical populations and geriatric cohorts presenting peculiar needs and expectations. Despite the longstanding conceptual framework of user experience, a consensus regarding its definition and optimal evaluation methodologies remains elusive, especially within healthcare contexts. This systematic scoping review examines state-of-the-art questionnaire-based instruments for assessing user experience in healthcare virtual reality applications, synthesizing current evaluation approaches and identifying key user experience dimensions. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Review guidelines, we analyzed articles employing questionnaires to evaluate user experience in virtual reality-based health applications for adults. Following a meticulous screening process of 325 papers across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, 17 studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies predominantly used multiple and diverse questionnaires exploring several dimensions. Eight key user experience dimensions emerged: usability and functionality, aesthetics of design, engagement, emotional state, presence, realism of environments, side effects, and motivation and intention of use. Current evaluation lacks standardization and theoretical consistency. We propose a comprehensive eight-domain framework and recommend integrating multidisciplinary expertise, implementing longitudinal evaluation approaches, and developing psychometrically validated instruments. These findings provide essential guidance for improving patient outcomes and healthcare delivery efficacy through optimized virtual reality-based implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1561364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to evaluate user experience in digital health? A scoping review of questionnaires in virtual reality applications.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Bruni, Valentina Mancuso, Elisa Pedroli\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1561364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The exponential growth and integration of virtual reality technology in clinical environments necessitates a comprehensive user experience evaluation. This assessment is critical for clinical populations and geriatric cohorts presenting peculiar needs and expectations. Despite the longstanding conceptual framework of user experience, a consensus regarding its definition and optimal evaluation methodologies remains elusive, especially within healthcare contexts. This systematic scoping review examines state-of-the-art questionnaire-based instruments for assessing user experience in healthcare virtual reality applications, synthesizing current evaluation approaches and identifying key user experience dimensions. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Review guidelines, we analyzed articles employing questionnaires to evaluate user experience in virtual reality-based health applications for adults. Following a meticulous screening process of 325 papers across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, 17 studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies predominantly used multiple and diverse questionnaires exploring several dimensions. Eight key user experience dimensions emerged: usability and functionality, aesthetics of design, engagement, emotional state, presence, realism of environments, side effects, and motivation and intention of use. Current evaluation lacks standardization and theoretical consistency. We propose a comprehensive eight-domain framework and recommend integrating multidisciplinary expertise, implementing longitudinal evaluation approaches, and developing psychometrically validated instruments. These findings provide essential guidance for improving patient outcomes and healthcare delivery efficacy through optimized virtual reality-based implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1561364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1561364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1561364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虚拟现实技术在临床环境中的指数级增长和集成需要全面的用户体验评估。这一评估对于临床人群和有特殊需求和期望的老年人群至关重要。尽管用户体验的概念框架由来已久,但关于其定义和最佳评估方法的共识仍然难以捉摸,特别是在医疗保健环境中。这个系统的范围审查检查了最先进的基于问卷的工具,用于评估医疗保健虚拟现实应用中的用户体验,综合当前的评估方法并确定关键的用户体验维度。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,我们分析了采用问卷调查的文章,以评估成人基于虚拟现实的健康应用程序的用户体验。在PubMed、Web of Science和Embase数据库中对325篇论文进行了细致的筛选后,有17项研究符合我们的纳入标准。研究主要使用多种不同的调查问卷来探索几个维度。8个关键的用户体验维度出现了:可用性和功能、设计美学、用户粘性、情感状态、存在感、环境现实性、副作用、动机和使用意图。目前的评价缺乏规范性和理论一致性。我们提出了一个全面的八域框架,并建议整合多学科专业知识,实施纵向评估方法,并开发心理测量学验证的工具。这些发现为通过优化基于虚拟现实的实施来改善患者预后和医疗保健服务效率提供了重要指导。
How to evaluate user experience in digital health? A scoping review of questionnaires in virtual reality applications.
The exponential growth and integration of virtual reality technology in clinical environments necessitates a comprehensive user experience evaluation. This assessment is critical for clinical populations and geriatric cohorts presenting peculiar needs and expectations. Despite the longstanding conceptual framework of user experience, a consensus regarding its definition and optimal evaluation methodologies remains elusive, especially within healthcare contexts. This systematic scoping review examines state-of-the-art questionnaire-based instruments for assessing user experience in healthcare virtual reality applications, synthesizing current evaluation approaches and identifying key user experience dimensions. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Review guidelines, we analyzed articles employing questionnaires to evaluate user experience in virtual reality-based health applications for adults. Following a meticulous screening process of 325 papers across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, 17 studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies predominantly used multiple and diverse questionnaires exploring several dimensions. Eight key user experience dimensions emerged: usability and functionality, aesthetics of design, engagement, emotional state, presence, realism of environments, side effects, and motivation and intention of use. Current evaluation lacks standardization and theoretical consistency. We propose a comprehensive eight-domain framework and recommend integrating multidisciplinary expertise, implementing longitudinal evaluation approaches, and developing psychometrically validated instruments. These findings provide essential guidance for improving patient outcomes and healthcare delivery efficacy through optimized virtual reality-based implementation.