Sanjay Sethi, Brendan Clark, Erin K Buysman, Andrew Sargent, Lindsay G S Bengtson
{"title":"替托溴铵/奥替特罗或糠酸氟替卡松/乌莫替啶/维兰特罗治疗慢性阻塞性肺病且血嗜酸性粒细胞计数≤300细胞/μL患者的临床效果比较","authors":"Sanjay Sethi, Brendan Clark, Erin K Buysman, Andrew Sargent, Lindsay G S Bengtson","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S534974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of blood eosinophil count (BEC) is recommended to guide the use of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with BEC ≥300 cells/μL predictive of patients most likely to benefit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes between patients initiating dual bronchodilator therapy with tiotropium/olodaterol (TIO/OLO) versus triple therapy with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with COPD and BEC ≤300 cells/μL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using claims data from the Optum Research Database. Patients with COPD initiated on TIO/OLO or FF/UMEC/VI between 01 June 2015 and 30 November 2019, with a baseline BEC were included. TIO/OLO initiators were 1:1 propensity score matched with FF/UMEC/VI initiators. Time to first exacerbation and pneumonia diagnosis were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. COPD exacerbations and COPD and/or pneumonia-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost outcomes were presented as population annualized averages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 3867 individuals with a baseline BEC result. Among these, 3168 (81.9%) had BEC ≤300 cells/μL. After matching, 1098 matched pairs with BEC ≤300 cells/μL were retained. The follow-up annualized count of moderate/severe exacerbations was not significantly different between TIO/OLO and FF/UMEC/VI initiators (1.05 vs 0.99, p=0.535). Annualized counts of COPD and/or pneumonia-related HRU were not significantly different, except for emergency department visits, which were lower for TIO/OLO than FF/UMEC/VI (0.59 vs 0.83, p=0.018). Annualized COPD and/or pneumonia-related emergency department ($370 vs $538, p=0.034) and pharmacy costs ($4692 vs $6573, p<0.001) were lower for TIO/OLO versus FF/UMEC/VI initiators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eight in ten patients with COPD who initiated FF/UMEC/VI had BEC ≤300 cells/μL. TIO/OLO and FF/UMEC/VI users with BEC ≤300 cells/μL experienced similar rates of COPD exacerbations. TIO/OLO initiators incurred lower pharmacy costs related to COPD and/or pneumonia than FF/UMEC/VI initiators. These results support treatment recommendations of reserving inhaled corticosteroids for frequent exacerbators and patients with elevated eosinophil counts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"3327-3338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12478208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparable Clinical Outcomes with Tiotropium/Olodaterol or Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients with COPD and Blood Eosinophil Count ≤300 Cells/μL.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjay Sethi, Brendan Clark, Erin K Buysman, Andrew Sargent, Lindsay G S Bengtson\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S534974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessment of blood eosinophil count (BEC) is recommended to guide the use of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with BEC ≥300 cells/μL predictive of patients most likely to benefit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes between patients initiating dual bronchodilator therapy with tiotropium/olodaterol (TIO/OLO) versus triple therapy with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with COPD and BEC ≤300 cells/μL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using claims data from the Optum Research Database. Patients with COPD initiated on TIO/OLO or FF/UMEC/VI between 01 June 2015 and 30 November 2019, with a baseline BEC were included. TIO/OLO initiators were 1:1 propensity score matched with FF/UMEC/VI initiators. Time to first exacerbation and pneumonia diagnosis were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. COPD exacerbations and COPD and/or pneumonia-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost outcomes were presented as population annualized averages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 3867 individuals with a baseline BEC result. Among these, 3168 (81.9%) had BEC ≤300 cells/μL. After matching, 1098 matched pairs with BEC ≤300 cells/μL were retained. The follow-up annualized count of moderate/severe exacerbations was not significantly different between TIO/OLO and FF/UMEC/VI initiators (1.05 vs 0.99, p=0.535). Annualized counts of COPD and/or pneumonia-related HRU were not significantly different, except for emergency department visits, which were lower for TIO/OLO than FF/UMEC/VI (0.59 vs 0.83, p=0.018). Annualized COPD and/or pneumonia-related emergency department ($370 vs $538, p=0.034) and pharmacy costs ($4692 vs $6573, p<0.001) were lower for TIO/OLO versus FF/UMEC/VI initiators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eight in ten patients with COPD who initiated FF/UMEC/VI had BEC ≤300 cells/μL. TIO/OLO and FF/UMEC/VI users with BEC ≤300 cells/μL experienced similar rates of COPD exacerbations. TIO/OLO initiators incurred lower pharmacy costs related to COPD and/or pneumonia than FF/UMEC/VI initiators. These results support treatment recommendations of reserving inhaled corticosteroids for frequent exacerbators and patients with elevated eosinophil counts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"3327-3338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12478208/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S534974\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S534974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
推荐评估血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)来指导慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者吸入皮质类固醇的使用,BEC≥300细胞/μL预测患者最有可能受益。目的:比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病且BEC≤300 cells/μL的患者采用噻托溴铵/奥替特罗(TIO/OLO)与糠酸氟替卡松/乌莫替啶/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)三线治疗的结果。方法:回顾性队列研究,使用来自Optum研究数据库的索赔数据。纳入了2015年6月1日至2019年11月30日期间接受TIO/OLO或FF/UMEC/VI治疗的COPD患者,基线BEC。TIO/OLO启动物与FF/UMEC/VI启动物呈1:1倾向评分匹配。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估首次加重时间和肺炎诊断。COPD恶化和COPD和/或肺炎相关的医疗资源利用率(HRU)和成本结果以人口年化平均值表示。结果:研究人群包括3867名基线BEC结果的个体。其中,BEC≤300 cells/μL的有3168株(81.9%)。配对后,保留了1098对BEC≤300 cells/μL的配对对。随访中/重度加重的年化计数在TIO/OLO和FF/UMEC/VI启动者之间无显著差异(1.05 vs 0.99, p=0.535)。COPD和/或肺炎相关HRU的年化计数无显著差异,但急诊就诊除外,TIO/OLO低于FF/UMEC/VI (0.59 vs 0.83, p=0.018)。COPD和/或肺炎相关急诊科的年化费用(370美元vs 538美元,p=0.034)和药费(4692美元vs 6573美元)。结论:10例启动FF/UMEC/VI的COPD患者中有8例的BEC≤300细胞/μL。BEC≤300 cells/μL的TIO/OLO和FF/UMEC/VI使用者COPD加重率相似。与FF/UMEC/VI启动剂相比,TIO/OLO启动剂与COPD和/或肺炎相关的药房成本更低。这些结果支持对频繁加重者和嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高的患者保留吸入皮质类固醇的治疗建议。
Comparable Clinical Outcomes with Tiotropium/Olodaterol or Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients with COPD and Blood Eosinophil Count ≤300 Cells/μL.
Introduction: Assessment of blood eosinophil count (BEC) is recommended to guide the use of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with BEC ≥300 cells/μL predictive of patients most likely to benefit.
Objective: To compare outcomes between patients initiating dual bronchodilator therapy with tiotropium/olodaterol (TIO/OLO) versus triple therapy with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with COPD and BEC ≤300 cells/μL.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study using claims data from the Optum Research Database. Patients with COPD initiated on TIO/OLO or FF/UMEC/VI between 01 June 2015 and 30 November 2019, with a baseline BEC were included. TIO/OLO initiators were 1:1 propensity score matched with FF/UMEC/VI initiators. Time to first exacerbation and pneumonia diagnosis were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. COPD exacerbations and COPD and/or pneumonia-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost outcomes were presented as population annualized averages.
Results: The study population included 3867 individuals with a baseline BEC result. Among these, 3168 (81.9%) had BEC ≤300 cells/μL. After matching, 1098 matched pairs with BEC ≤300 cells/μL were retained. The follow-up annualized count of moderate/severe exacerbations was not significantly different between TIO/OLO and FF/UMEC/VI initiators (1.05 vs 0.99, p=0.535). Annualized counts of COPD and/or pneumonia-related HRU were not significantly different, except for emergency department visits, which were lower for TIO/OLO than FF/UMEC/VI (0.59 vs 0.83, p=0.018). Annualized COPD and/or pneumonia-related emergency department ($370 vs $538, p=0.034) and pharmacy costs ($4692 vs $6573, p<0.001) were lower for TIO/OLO versus FF/UMEC/VI initiators.
Conclusion: Eight in ten patients with COPD who initiated FF/UMEC/VI had BEC ≤300 cells/μL. TIO/OLO and FF/UMEC/VI users with BEC ≤300 cells/μL experienced similar rates of COPD exacerbations. TIO/OLO initiators incurred lower pharmacy costs related to COPD and/or pneumonia than FF/UMEC/VI initiators. These results support treatment recommendations of reserving inhaled corticosteroids for frequent exacerbators and patients with elevated eosinophil counts.
期刊介绍:
An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals