Yuejiao Wu, Kerryann Walsh, Sonia L J White, Lyra L'Estrange
{"title":"学校防范儿童性虐待教育的准备:理论模型综述。","authors":"Yuejiao Wu, Kerryann Walsh, Sonia L J White, Lyra L'Estrange","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01843-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schools' readiness appears an important factor influencing their implementation of violence prevention programs. This review was undertaken to identify, describe, and compare existing theoretical readiness models and their strengths and limitations, and to select an appropriate theoretical model to underpin the study of schools' readiness for child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention education. This, in turn, would guide development of a new instrument to assess schools' readiness for CSA prevention. Searches were conducted from September to December 2022 in ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMed, Science Direct, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and handsearches were made in academic journals. We included peer-reviewed papers published in English that reported the development, testing, or use of a theoretical readiness model at an organizational level. We identified three candidate groups of theoretical models from 85 papers: the community readiness model, the multidimensional child maltreatment prevention readiness model, and organizational readiness for change theories. These models were appraised using four criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks (Birken et al. 2017). We propose Weiner's (2009) organizational readiness for change as the most plausible theoretical model with both descriptive and analytical potential for assessing schools' readiness for child sexual abuse prevention education, and discuss the conceptual and empirical strengths and weaknesses of the identified models. The review has demonstrated the utility of applying criteria (Birken et al. 2017) to appraise and select theoretical readiness models in CSA prevention education and other implementation research areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schools' Readiness for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education: an Overview of Theoretical Models.\",\"authors\":\"Yuejiao Wu, Kerryann Walsh, Sonia L J White, Lyra L'Estrange\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11121-025-01843-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Schools' readiness appears an important factor influencing their implementation of violence prevention programs. This review was undertaken to identify, describe, and compare existing theoretical readiness models and their strengths and limitations, and to select an appropriate theoretical model to underpin the study of schools' readiness for child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention education. This, in turn, would guide development of a new instrument to assess schools' readiness for CSA prevention. Searches were conducted from September to December 2022 in ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMed, Science Direct, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and handsearches were made in academic journals. We included peer-reviewed papers published in English that reported the development, testing, or use of a theoretical readiness model at an organizational level. We identified three candidate groups of theoretical models from 85 papers: the community readiness model, the multidimensional child maltreatment prevention readiness model, and organizational readiness for change theories. These models were appraised using four criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks (Birken et al. 2017). We propose Weiner's (2009) organizational readiness for change as the most plausible theoretical model with both descriptive and analytical potential for assessing schools' readiness for child sexual abuse prevention education, and discuss the conceptual and empirical strengths and weaknesses of the identified models. The review has demonstrated the utility of applying criteria (Birken et al. 2017) to appraise and select theoretical readiness models in CSA prevention education and other implementation research areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevention Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevention Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01843-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01843-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
学校是否做好准备似乎是影响其实施暴力预防方案的一个重要因素。本综述旨在识别、描述和比较现有的理论准备模型及其优势和局限性,并选择合适的理论模型来支持学校对儿童性虐待(CSA)预防教育的准备研究。反过来,这将指导开发一种新的工具,以评估学校预防CSA的准备情况。检索于2022年9月至12月在ERIC、PsychINFO、PubMed、Science Direct、Sociological Abstracts、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar中进行,并在学术期刊中进行手工检索。我们收录了用英语发表的同行评审论文,这些论文报告了在组织层面上理论准备模型的开发、测试或使用。我们从85篇论文中确定了三个候选理论模型组:社区准备模型、多维儿童虐待预防准备模型和组织变革准备理论。这些模型使用选择实施科学理论和框架的四个标准进行评估(Birken et al. 2017)。我们提出Weiner(2009)的组织变革准备作为最合理的理论模型,具有描述性和分析潜力,可用于评估学校对儿童性虐待预防教育的准备情况,并讨论已确定模型的概念和经验优势和弱点。该综述证明了应用标准(Birken et al. 2017)在CSA预防教育和其他实施研究领域评估和选择理论准备模型的效用。
Schools' Readiness for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education: an Overview of Theoretical Models.
Schools' readiness appears an important factor influencing their implementation of violence prevention programs. This review was undertaken to identify, describe, and compare existing theoretical readiness models and their strengths and limitations, and to select an appropriate theoretical model to underpin the study of schools' readiness for child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention education. This, in turn, would guide development of a new instrument to assess schools' readiness for CSA prevention. Searches were conducted from September to December 2022 in ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMed, Science Direct, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and handsearches were made in academic journals. We included peer-reviewed papers published in English that reported the development, testing, or use of a theoretical readiness model at an organizational level. We identified three candidate groups of theoretical models from 85 papers: the community readiness model, the multidimensional child maltreatment prevention readiness model, and organizational readiness for change theories. These models were appraised using four criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks (Birken et al. 2017). We propose Weiner's (2009) organizational readiness for change as the most plausible theoretical model with both descriptive and analytical potential for assessing schools' readiness for child sexual abuse prevention education, and discuss the conceptual and empirical strengths and weaknesses of the identified models. The review has demonstrated the utility of applying criteria (Birken et al. 2017) to appraise and select theoretical readiness models in CSA prevention education and other implementation research areas.
期刊介绍:
Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.