三组低强度的阻力运动,缓慢的运动和张力的产生会导致更多的肌肉疲劳。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Takashi Yamashita, Yulong Ren, Yuta Kosuge, Eisuke Ochi
{"title":"三组低强度的阻力运动,缓慢的运动和张力的产生会导致更多的肌肉疲劳。","authors":"Takashi Yamashita, Yulong Ren, Yuta Kosuge, Eisuke Ochi","doi":"10.1186/s40101-025-00401-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There are no previous reports investigating the effects of different set numbers in low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation (LST) on muscle fatigue using surface electromyography (sEMG). This study aimed to examine muscle fatigue induced by one set and three sets of LST and to compare the impact of set differences on muscle activity by comparing LST with traditional high-intensity resistance exercise (TRAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three healthy male students participated in this study. After 1RM testing in each leg was completed, participants were randomly assigned to either a group performing one set of exercises (n = 10) or a group performing three sets (n = 13). Each participant performed the LST protocol (50% 1RM) and the TRAD protocol (80% 1RM) with single leg extension until failure. The LST protocol consisted of a 3-s concentric, a 1-s isometric, and a 3-s eccentric phase. In contrast, the TRAD protocol consisted of a 1-s concentric, a 1-s eccentric, and a 1-s rest phase. For the three-set group, a 2-min rest interval was provided between sets. The outcome measures included maximal isometric knee extension torque (MVC) before and after exercise, root mean square (RMS), and mean power frequency (MPF) values recorded during the exercises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in MVC were observed between the type of exercise or the number of sets. Similarly, no significant differences in the RMS during the exercise were observed across exercise types or number of sets. On the other hand, with the significant interaction of MPF (p = 0.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.399), there was a significant difference in three sets of LST compared to one set of LST (p = 0.012, d = 1.16) and three sets of TRAD (p < 0.001, d = 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that performing three sets of LST induces significant muscle fatigue. Therefore, we speculate that performing three sets of LST may lead to the accumulation of metabolic stress and thereby cause muscle fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":48730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiological Anthropology","volume":"44 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three sets of low-intensity resistance exercises with slow movement and tonic force generation cause more muscular fatigue.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Yamashita, Yulong Ren, Yuta Kosuge, Eisuke Ochi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40101-025-00401-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There are no previous reports investigating the effects of different set numbers in low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation (LST) on muscle fatigue using surface electromyography (sEMG). This study aimed to examine muscle fatigue induced by one set and three sets of LST and to compare the impact of set differences on muscle activity by comparing LST with traditional high-intensity resistance exercise (TRAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three healthy male students participated in this study. After 1RM testing in each leg was completed, participants were randomly assigned to either a group performing one set of exercises (n = 10) or a group performing three sets (n = 13). Each participant performed the LST protocol (50% 1RM) and the TRAD protocol (80% 1RM) with single leg extension until failure. The LST protocol consisted of a 3-s concentric, a 1-s isometric, and a 3-s eccentric phase. In contrast, the TRAD protocol consisted of a 1-s concentric, a 1-s eccentric, and a 1-s rest phase. For the three-set group, a 2-min rest interval was provided between sets. The outcome measures included maximal isometric knee extension torque (MVC) before and after exercise, root mean square (RMS), and mean power frequency (MPF) values recorded during the exercises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in MVC were observed between the type of exercise or the number of sets. Similarly, no significant differences in the RMS during the exercise were observed across exercise types or number of sets. On the other hand, with the significant interaction of MPF (p = 0.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.399), there was a significant difference in three sets of LST compared to one set of LST (p = 0.012, d = 1.16) and three sets of TRAD (p < 0.001, d = 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that performing three sets of LST induces significant muscle fatigue. Therefore, we speculate that performing three sets of LST may lead to the accumulation of metabolic stress and thereby cause muscle fatigue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiological Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487497/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiological Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-025-00401-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-025-00401-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用肌表电图(sEMG)研究慢速运动和强直力产生(LST)低强度阻力运动中不同组数对肌肉疲劳的影响,目前尚未见报道。本研究旨在通过对比LST和传统的高强度阻力运动(TRAD),检验一组和三组LST诱导的肌肉疲劳,并比较组差对肌肉活动的影响。方法:以23名健康男大学生为研究对象。在每条腿的1RM测试完成后,参与者被随机分配到一组进行一组锻炼(n = 10)或一组进行三组锻炼(n = 13)。每个参与者执行LST方案(50% 1RM)和TRAD方案(80% 1RM),单腿伸展直到失败。LST协议包括一个3-s同心相位、一个1-s等距相位和一个3-s偏心相位。相比之下,TRAD协议由1-s同心相位、1-s偏心相位和1-s休息相位组成。对于三组,两组之间有2分钟的休息时间。结果测量包括运动前后的最大等距膝关节伸展扭矩(MVC),运动期间记录的均方根(RMS)和平均功率频率(MPF)值。结果:MVC在运动类型和运动次数之间无显著差异。同样,在运动过程中,RMS在运动类型或组数上也没有显著差异。另一方面,在MPF的显著交互作用下(p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.399),三组LST与一组LST (p = 0.012, d = 1.16)和三组TRAD (p)之间存在显著差异(p = 0.012, d = 1.16)。因此,我们推测进行三组LST可能会导致代谢应激的积累,从而导致肌肉疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three sets of low-intensity resistance exercises with slow movement and tonic force generation cause more muscular fatigue.

Purpose: There are no previous reports investigating the effects of different set numbers in low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation (LST) on muscle fatigue using surface electromyography (sEMG). This study aimed to examine muscle fatigue induced by one set and three sets of LST and to compare the impact of set differences on muscle activity by comparing LST with traditional high-intensity resistance exercise (TRAD).

Methods: Twenty-three healthy male students participated in this study. After 1RM testing in each leg was completed, participants were randomly assigned to either a group performing one set of exercises (n = 10) or a group performing three sets (n = 13). Each participant performed the LST protocol (50% 1RM) and the TRAD protocol (80% 1RM) with single leg extension until failure. The LST protocol consisted of a 3-s concentric, a 1-s isometric, and a 3-s eccentric phase. In contrast, the TRAD protocol consisted of a 1-s concentric, a 1-s eccentric, and a 1-s rest phase. For the three-set group, a 2-min rest interval was provided between sets. The outcome measures included maximal isometric knee extension torque (MVC) before and after exercise, root mean square (RMS), and mean power frequency (MPF) values recorded during the exercises.

Results: No significant differences in MVC were observed between the type of exercise or the number of sets. Similarly, no significant differences in the RMS during the exercise were observed across exercise types or number of sets. On the other hand, with the significant interaction of MPF (p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.399), there was a significant difference in three sets of LST compared to one set of LST (p = 0.012, d = 1.16) and three sets of TRAD (p < 0.001, d = 0.93).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that performing three sets of LST induces significant muscle fatigue. Therefore, we speculate that performing three sets of LST may lead to the accumulation of metabolic stress and thereby cause muscle fatigue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Physiological Anthropology (JPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research on the physiological functions of modern mankind, with an emphasis on the physical and bio-cultural effects on human adaptability to the current environment. The objective of JPA is to evaluate physiological adaptations to modern living environments, and to publish research from different scientific fields concerned with environmental impact on human life. Topic areas include, but are not limited to: environmental physiology bio-cultural environment living environment epigenetic adaptation development and growth age and sex differences nutrition and morphology physical fitness and health Journal of Physiological Anthropology is the official journal of the Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信