K E Tranter, L A Harvey, J Ross, B Wadsworth, D J Berlowitz, E A Bye, L W Chen, H Patterson, M McDonald, S Calthorpe, J Agostinello, E Gollan, S Denis, L Blecher, D Wilson, J Peach, T McDonald, M Walters, J Mather, L Davis, M D'Cruz, J V Glinsky
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者呼吸管理的物理治疗干预:来自澳大利亚和新西兰临床实践指南的建议。","authors":"K E Tranter, L A Harvey, J Ross, B Wadsworth, D J Berlowitz, E A Bye, L W Chen, H Patterson, M McDonald, S Calthorpe, J Agostinello, E Gollan, S Denis, L Blecher, D Wilson, J Peach, T McDonald, M Walters, J Mather, L Davis, M D'Cruz, J V Glinsky","doi":"10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Development of respiratory recommendations in a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(i) To describe the evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements for the effectiveness of respiratory interventions to improve respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance. (ii) To outline the clinical rationale for these recommendations and statements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australia and New Zealand METHODS: Sixteen clinical questions relating to respiratory interventions for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were presented in PICO format (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and decided a-priori by a respiratory guideline committee. Systematic reviews were conducted to answer each of the questions using rigorous methodology to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. Evidence was assessed for risk of bias and quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Details were presented to a guideline panel who voted on each question and developed either an evidence recommendation or a consensus-based opinion statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were relevant for eight questions. Three of these trials had interventions and outcomes relevant to more than one question. Overall, ten, eight and two trials answered questions related to improving respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Australian and New Zealand CPGs for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI ( www.sciptguide.com ) provide evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements to inform respiratory management of people with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiotherapy interventions for the respiratory management of people with spinal cord injury: recommendations from an Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline.\",\"authors\":\"K E Tranter, L A Harvey, J Ross, B Wadsworth, D J Berlowitz, E A Bye, L W Chen, H Patterson, M McDonald, S Calthorpe, J Agostinello, E Gollan, S Denis, L Blecher, D Wilson, J Peach, T McDonald, M Walters, J Mather, L Davis, M D'Cruz, J V Glinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Development of respiratory recommendations in a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(i) To describe the evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements for the effectiveness of respiratory interventions to improve respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance. (ii) To outline the clinical rationale for these recommendations and statements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australia and New Zealand METHODS: Sixteen clinical questions relating to respiratory interventions for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were presented in PICO format (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and decided a-priori by a respiratory guideline committee. Systematic reviews were conducted to answer each of the questions using rigorous methodology to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. Evidence was assessed for risk of bias and quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Details were presented to a guideline panel who voted on each question and developed either an evidence recommendation or a consensus-based opinion statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were relevant for eight questions. Three of these trials had interventions and outcomes relevant to more than one question. Overall, ten, eight and two trials answered questions related to improving respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Australian and New Zealand CPGs for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI ( www.sciptguide.com ) provide evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements to inform respiratory management of people with SCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spinal cord\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spinal cord\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physiotherapy interventions for the respiratory management of people with spinal cord injury: recommendations from an Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline.
Study design: Development of respiratory recommendations in a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG).
Objectives: (i) To describe the evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements for the effectiveness of respiratory interventions to improve respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance. (ii) To outline the clinical rationale for these recommendations and statements.
Setting: Australia and New Zealand METHODS: Sixteen clinical questions relating to respiratory interventions for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were presented in PICO format (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and decided a-priori by a respiratory guideline committee. Systematic reviews were conducted to answer each of the questions using rigorous methodology to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. Evidence was assessed for risk of bias and quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Details were presented to a guideline panel who voted on each question and developed either an evidence recommendation or a consensus-based opinion statement.
Results: Eighteen randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were relevant for eight questions. Three of these trials had interventions and outcomes relevant to more than one question. Overall, ten, eight and two trials answered questions related to improving respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance, respectively.
Conclusion: The Australian and New Zealand CPGs for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI ( www.sciptguide.com ) provide evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements to inform respiratory management of people with SCI.
期刊介绍:
Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews.
Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.