脊髓损伤患者呼吸管理的物理治疗干预:来自澳大利亚和新西兰临床实践指南的建议。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
K E Tranter, L A Harvey, J Ross, B Wadsworth, D J Berlowitz, E A Bye, L W Chen, H Patterson, M McDonald, S Calthorpe, J Agostinello, E Gollan, S Denis, L Blecher, D Wilson, J Peach, T McDonald, M Walters, J Mather, L Davis, M D'Cruz, J V Glinsky
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者呼吸管理的物理治疗干预:来自澳大利亚和新西兰临床实践指南的建议。","authors":"K E Tranter, L A Harvey, J Ross, B Wadsworth, D J Berlowitz, E A Bye, L W Chen, H Patterson, M McDonald, S Calthorpe, J Agostinello, E Gollan, S Denis, L Blecher, D Wilson, J Peach, T McDonald, M Walters, J Mather, L Davis, M D'Cruz, J V Glinsky","doi":"10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Development of respiratory recommendations in a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(i) To describe the evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements for the effectiveness of respiratory interventions to improve respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance. (ii) To outline the clinical rationale for these recommendations and statements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australia and New Zealand METHODS: Sixteen clinical questions relating to respiratory interventions for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were presented in PICO format (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and decided a-priori by a respiratory guideline committee. Systematic reviews were conducted to answer each of the questions using rigorous methodology to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. Evidence was assessed for risk of bias and quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Details were presented to a guideline panel who voted on each question and developed either an evidence recommendation or a consensus-based opinion statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were relevant for eight questions. Three of these trials had interventions and outcomes relevant to more than one question. Overall, ten, eight and two trials answered questions related to improving respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Australian and New Zealand CPGs for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI ( www.sciptguide.com ) provide evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements to inform respiratory management of people with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiotherapy interventions for the respiratory management of people with spinal cord injury: recommendations from an Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline.\",\"authors\":\"K E Tranter, L A Harvey, J Ross, B Wadsworth, D J Berlowitz, E A Bye, L W Chen, H Patterson, M McDonald, S Calthorpe, J Agostinello, E Gollan, S Denis, L Blecher, D Wilson, J Peach, T McDonald, M Walters, J Mather, L Davis, M D'Cruz, J V Glinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Development of respiratory recommendations in a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(i) To describe the evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements for the effectiveness of respiratory interventions to improve respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance. (ii) To outline the clinical rationale for these recommendations and statements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australia and New Zealand METHODS: Sixteen clinical questions relating to respiratory interventions for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were presented in PICO format (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and decided a-priori by a respiratory guideline committee. Systematic reviews were conducted to answer each of the questions using rigorous methodology to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. Evidence was assessed for risk of bias and quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Details were presented to a guideline panel who voted on each question and developed either an evidence recommendation or a consensus-based opinion statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were relevant for eight questions. Three of these trials had interventions and outcomes relevant to more than one question. Overall, ten, eight and two trials answered questions related to improving respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Australian and New Zealand CPGs for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI ( www.sciptguide.com ) provide evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements to inform respiratory management of people with SCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spinal cord\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spinal cord\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01116-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:制定临床实践指南(CPG)中的呼吸建议。目标:(i)描述有关呼吸干预措施有效性的证据建议和基于共识的意见声明,以改善呼吸肌力量、肺容量和分泌物清除率。(ii)概述这些建议和陈述的临床依据。方法:以PICO格式(参与者、干预、比较、结果)提出与脊髓损伤(SCI)患者呼吸干预相关的16个临床问题,并由呼吸指南委员会先验地决定。采用严格的方法从随机对照试验中合成证据,进行系统评价以回答每个问题。采用建议分级评估、发展和评价(GRADE)对证据的偏倚风险和质量进行评估。将细节提交给指导小组,指导小组对每个问题进行投票,并制定证据建议或基于共识的意见声明。结果:18项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,与8个问题相关。其中三项试验的干预措施和结果与不止一个问题相关。总的来说,10项、8项和2项试验分别回答了与改善呼吸肌力量、肺容量和分泌物清除率有关的问题。结论:澳大利亚和新西兰脊髓损伤患者物理治疗管理CPGs (www.sciptguide.com)为脊髓损伤患者的呼吸管理提供了证据建议和基于共识的意见声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physiotherapy interventions for the respiratory management of people with spinal cord injury: recommendations from an Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline.

Study design: Development of respiratory recommendations in a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG).

Objectives: (i) To describe the evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements for the effectiveness of respiratory interventions to improve respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance. (ii) To outline the clinical rationale for these recommendations and statements.

Setting: Australia and New Zealand METHODS: Sixteen clinical questions relating to respiratory interventions for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were presented in PICO format (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and decided a-priori by a respiratory guideline committee. Systematic reviews were conducted to answer each of the questions using rigorous methodology to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. Evidence was assessed for risk of bias and quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Details were presented to a guideline panel who voted on each question and developed either an evidence recommendation or a consensus-based opinion statement.

Results: Eighteen randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were relevant for eight questions. Three of these trials had interventions and outcomes relevant to more than one question. Overall, ten, eight and two trials answered questions related to improving respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance, respectively.

Conclusion: The Australian and New Zealand CPGs for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI ( www.sciptguide.com ) provide evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements to inform respiratory management of people with SCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信