选择偏差下因果效应的尖锐界限的研究。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stina Zetterstrom, Arvid Sjölander, Ingeborg Waernbaum
{"title":"选择偏差下因果效应的尖锐界限的研究。","authors":"Stina Zetterstrom, Arvid Sjölander, Ingeborg Waernbaum","doi":"10.1177/09622802251374168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selection bias is a common type of bias, and depending on the causal estimand of interest and the structure of the selection variable, it can be a threat to both external and internal validity. One way to quantify the maximum magnitude of potential selection bias is to calculate bounds for the causal estimand. Here, we consider previously proposed bounds for selection bias, which require the specification of certain sensitivity parameters. First, we show that the sensitivity parameters are variation independent. Second, we show that the bounds are sharp under certain conditions. Furthermore, we derive improved bounds that are based on the same sensitivity parameters. Depending on the causal estimand, these bounds require additional information regarding the selection probabilities. We illustrate the improved bounds in an empirical example where the effect of breakfast eating on overweight is estimated. Lastly, the performance of the bounds are investigated in a numerical experiment for sharp and non-sharp cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"9622802251374168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigations of sharp bounds for causal effects under selection bias.\",\"authors\":\"Stina Zetterstrom, Arvid Sjölander, Ingeborg Waernbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09622802251374168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Selection bias is a common type of bias, and depending on the causal estimand of interest and the structure of the selection variable, it can be a threat to both external and internal validity. One way to quantify the maximum magnitude of potential selection bias is to calculate bounds for the causal estimand. Here, we consider previously proposed bounds for selection bias, which require the specification of certain sensitivity parameters. First, we show that the sensitivity parameters are variation independent. Second, we show that the bounds are sharp under certain conditions. Furthermore, we derive improved bounds that are based on the same sensitivity parameters. Depending on the causal estimand, these bounds require additional information regarding the selection probabilities. We illustrate the improved bounds in an empirical example where the effect of breakfast eating on overweight is estimated. Lastly, the performance of the bounds are investigated in a numerical experiment for sharp and non-sharp cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9622802251374168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802251374168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802251374168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择偏差是一种常见的偏差类型,根据兴趣的因果估计和选择变量的结构,它可以对外部和内部有效性构成威胁。量化潜在选择偏差的最大幅度的一种方法是计算因果估计的界限。在这里,我们考虑先前提出的选择偏差的界限,这需要指定某些灵敏度参数。首先,我们证明了灵敏度参数是变化无关的。其次,我们证明了在某些条件下边界是尖锐的。此外,我们还推导了基于相同灵敏度参数的改进边界。根据因果估计,这些界限需要关于选择概率的附加信息。我们在一个经验例子中说明了改进的界限,其中估计了吃早餐对超重的影响。最后,通过数值实验研究了边界在尖锐和非尖锐情况下的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigations of sharp bounds for causal effects under selection bias.

Selection bias is a common type of bias, and depending on the causal estimand of interest and the structure of the selection variable, it can be a threat to both external and internal validity. One way to quantify the maximum magnitude of potential selection bias is to calculate bounds for the causal estimand. Here, we consider previously proposed bounds for selection bias, which require the specification of certain sensitivity parameters. First, we show that the sensitivity parameters are variation independent. Second, we show that the bounds are sharp under certain conditions. Furthermore, we derive improved bounds that are based on the same sensitivity parameters. Depending on the causal estimand, these bounds require additional information regarding the selection probabilities. We illustrate the improved bounds in an empirical example where the effect of breakfast eating on overweight is estimated. Lastly, the performance of the bounds are investigated in a numerical experiment for sharp and non-sharp cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信