David G Hanelin, Jonah Tripp, Alexander Sankin, Nitya Abraham
{"title":"泌尿外科自主地图:评估主治医生对普通泌尿外科手术住院医师能力的期望。","authors":"David G Hanelin, Jonah Tripp, Alexander Sankin, Nitya Abraham","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve resident education by assessing attending urologists' expectations for resident competency in common urological procedures and to create procedure-specific \"autonomy maps\" to visually present expected progression of surgical independence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey of urologists at a single institution evaluated ten common urologic procedures. Faculty were asked to identify procedural steps and assign a postgraduate year (PGY) at which a resident should be able to complete each surgical step with passive help. Linear regression and ANOVA tests were conducted to assess whether faculty demographics influenced assigned PGY competency levels for each procedure. Aggregated responses were used to create color-coded autonomy maps by PGY level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 faculty members across six urologic subspecialties completed the survey. More complex surgical steps (e.g., lobe resection in TURP) were assigned higher PGY levels, while competency in foundational tasks (e.g., cystoscopy) was expected earlier. No faculty assigned identical expectations, highlighting variability in expectations. Faculty demographics were not significantly associated with autonomy expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The created autonomy maps provide a standardized, visual framework to clarify faculty expectations and guide resident development. These maps are intended to supplement rather than displace validated tools such as the Zwisch scale, OSATS, and OpTrust. Used together, these tools may enhance transparency, structure, and educational outcomes in surgical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urology Autonomy Maps: Evaluation of Attending Surgeon Expectations for Resident Competencies in Common Urology Procedures.\",\"authors\":\"David G Hanelin, Jonah Tripp, Alexander Sankin, Nitya Abraham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve resident education by assessing attending urologists' expectations for resident competency in common urological procedures and to create procedure-specific \\\"autonomy maps\\\" to visually present expected progression of surgical independence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey of urologists at a single institution evaluated ten common urologic procedures. Faculty were asked to identify procedural steps and assign a postgraduate year (PGY) at which a resident should be able to complete each surgical step with passive help. Linear regression and ANOVA tests were conducted to assess whether faculty demographics influenced assigned PGY competency levels for each procedure. Aggregated responses were used to create color-coded autonomy maps by PGY level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 faculty members across six urologic subspecialties completed the survey. More complex surgical steps (e.g., lobe resection in TURP) were assigned higher PGY levels, while competency in foundational tasks (e.g., cystoscopy) was expected earlier. No faculty assigned identical expectations, highlighting variability in expectations. Faculty demographics were not significantly associated with autonomy expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The created autonomy maps provide a standardized, visual framework to clarify faculty expectations and guide resident development. These maps are intended to supplement rather than displace validated tools such as the Zwisch scale, OSATS, and OpTrust. Used together, these tools may enhance transparency, structure, and educational outcomes in surgical training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Urology Autonomy Maps: Evaluation of Attending Surgeon Expectations for Resident Competencies in Common Urology Procedures.
Objectives: To improve resident education by assessing attending urologists' expectations for resident competency in common urological procedures and to create procedure-specific "autonomy maps" to visually present expected progression of surgical independence.
Methods: This cross-sectional survey of urologists at a single institution evaluated ten common urologic procedures. Faculty were asked to identify procedural steps and assign a postgraduate year (PGY) at which a resident should be able to complete each surgical step with passive help. Linear regression and ANOVA tests were conducted to assess whether faculty demographics influenced assigned PGY competency levels for each procedure. Aggregated responses were used to create color-coded autonomy maps by PGY level.
Results: 20 faculty members across six urologic subspecialties completed the survey. More complex surgical steps (e.g., lobe resection in TURP) were assigned higher PGY levels, while competency in foundational tasks (e.g., cystoscopy) was expected earlier. No faculty assigned identical expectations, highlighting variability in expectations. Faculty demographics were not significantly associated with autonomy expectations.
Conclusions: The created autonomy maps provide a standardized, visual framework to clarify faculty expectations and guide resident development. These maps are intended to supplement rather than displace validated tools such as the Zwisch scale, OSATS, and OpTrust. Used together, these tools may enhance transparency, structure, and educational outcomes in surgical training.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.