复杂疾病对经阴道超声诊断子宫骶韧带子宫内膜异位症准确性的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Shay M. Freger, Ido Mick, Saar Aharoni, Mathew Leonardi
{"title":"复杂疾病对经阴道超声诊断子宫骶韧带子宫内膜异位症准确性的影响。","authors":"Shay M. Freger,&nbsp;Ido Mick,&nbsp;Saar Aharoni,&nbsp;Mathew Leonardi","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the impact of complex disease states, including pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration and deep endometriosis (DE) of the bowel, on the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for detecting endometriosis of the uterosacral ligaments (USLs) and torus uterinus (TU).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This diagnostic accuracy study evaluated the performance of TVUS in diagnosing DE of the USLs and TU, using laparoscopic visualisation with histological confirmation as the reference standard among two previously reported prospectively collected cohorts. Complex disease states were defined as complete POD obliteration and/or DE of the bowel. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV) and likelihood ratios (LR), were calculated before and after the exclusion of complex disease cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 177 participants, 18.6% (33/177) had POD obliteration, 18.6% (33/177) had DE of the bowel and 16.4% (29/177) had both. Accuracy ranged from 93.1% to 94.7% for USLs and 97.2%–98.5% for TU, with minimal change after exclusion (≤ 1.5%). Sensitivity declined following exclusion, by −6.4% (left USL), −3.5% (right USL) and −2.7% (TU) after POD obliteration exclusion and further decreases of −1.8%, −3.4% and −4.4%, respectively, after bowel DE exclusion. Specificity remained ≥ 97.8% across all sites and reached 100% at the USLs after POD obliteration exclusion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Contrary to the assumption that complex disease states hinder TVUS accuracy, their presence may enhance lesion recognition, likely due to increased sonographic attentiveness when severe disease is suspected. While TVUS remains highly specific, its sensitivity decreases in the absence of complex disease, emphasising the need for meticulous and systematic imaging approaches.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Complex Disease on the Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Uterosacral Ligament Endometriosis\",\"authors\":\"Shay M. Freger,&nbsp;Ido Mick,&nbsp;Saar Aharoni,&nbsp;Mathew Leonardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajum.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the impact of complex disease states, including pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration and deep endometriosis (DE) of the bowel, on the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for detecting endometriosis of the uterosacral ligaments (USLs) and torus uterinus (TU).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This diagnostic accuracy study evaluated the performance of TVUS in diagnosing DE of the USLs and TU, using laparoscopic visualisation with histological confirmation as the reference standard among two previously reported prospectively collected cohorts. Complex disease states were defined as complete POD obliteration and/or DE of the bowel. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV) and likelihood ratios (LR), were calculated before and after the exclusion of complex disease cases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 177 participants, 18.6% (33/177) had POD obliteration, 18.6% (33/177) had DE of the bowel and 16.4% (29/177) had both. Accuracy ranged from 93.1% to 94.7% for USLs and 97.2%–98.5% for TU, with minimal change after exclusion (≤ 1.5%). Sensitivity declined following exclusion, by −6.4% (left USL), −3.5% (right USL) and −2.7% (TU) after POD obliteration exclusion and further decreases of −1.8%, −3.4% and −4.4%, respectively, after bowel DE exclusion. Specificity remained ≥ 97.8% across all sites and reached 100% at the USLs after POD obliteration exclusion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Contrary to the assumption that complex disease states hinder TVUS accuracy, their presence may enhance lesion recognition, likely due to increased sonographic attentiveness when severe disease is suspected. While TVUS remains highly specific, its sensitivity decreases in the absence of complex disease, emphasising the need for meticulous and systematic imaging approaches.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.70021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.70021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨道格拉斯袋(POD)闭塞和肠深部子宫内膜异位症(DE)等复杂疾病状态对经阴道超声(TVUS)检测子宫骶韧带(USLs)和子宫环(TU)子宫内膜异位症诊断准确性的影响。方法:本诊断准确性研究评估了TVUS在诊断USLs和TU的DE方面的表现,在先前报道的两个前瞻性收集的队列中,使用具有组织学证实的腹腔镜可视化作为参考标准。复杂疾病状态定义为肠内POD完全闭塞和/或DE。在排除复杂疾病病例前后计算诊断准确性指标,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV)和似然比(LR)。结果:177名参与者中,18.6%(33/177)有POD闭塞,18.6%(33/177)有肠道DE, 16.4%(29/177)两者兼有。USLs的准确率为93.1% ~ 94.7%,TU的准确率为97.2% ~ 98.5%,排除后变化最小(≤1.5%)。排除后敏感性下降,排除POD湮没后分别下降-6.4%(左USL)、-3.5%(右USL)和-2.7% (TU),排除肠DE后分别进一步下降-1.8%、-3.4%和-4.4%。所有部位特异性保持≥97.8%,排除POD湮没后usl特异性达到100%。结论:与复杂疾病状态阻碍TVUS准确性的假设相反,它们的存在可能会增强病变识别,这可能是由于怀疑严重疾病时超声注意度增加。虽然TVUS仍然具有高度特异性,但在没有复杂疾病的情况下,其敏感性降低,强调需要细致和系统的成像方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of Complex Disease on the Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Uterosacral Ligament Endometriosis

Influence of Complex Disease on the Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Uterosacral Ligament Endometriosis

Objective

To assess the impact of complex disease states, including pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration and deep endometriosis (DE) of the bowel, on the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for detecting endometriosis of the uterosacral ligaments (USLs) and torus uterinus (TU).

Methods

This diagnostic accuracy study evaluated the performance of TVUS in diagnosing DE of the USLs and TU, using laparoscopic visualisation with histological confirmation as the reference standard among two previously reported prospectively collected cohorts. Complex disease states were defined as complete POD obliteration and/or DE of the bowel. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV) and likelihood ratios (LR), were calculated before and after the exclusion of complex disease cases.

Results

Among 177 participants, 18.6% (33/177) had POD obliteration, 18.6% (33/177) had DE of the bowel and 16.4% (29/177) had both. Accuracy ranged from 93.1% to 94.7% for USLs and 97.2%–98.5% for TU, with minimal change after exclusion (≤ 1.5%). Sensitivity declined following exclusion, by −6.4% (left USL), −3.5% (right USL) and −2.7% (TU) after POD obliteration exclusion and further decreases of −1.8%, −3.4% and −4.4%, respectively, after bowel DE exclusion. Specificity remained ≥ 97.8% across all sites and reached 100% at the USLs after POD obliteration exclusion.

Conclusions

Contrary to the assumption that complex disease states hinder TVUS accuracy, their presence may enhance lesion recognition, likely due to increased sonographic attentiveness when severe disease is suspected. While TVUS remains highly specific, its sensitivity decreases in the absence of complex disease, emphasising the need for meticulous and systematic imaging approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信