导管张力试验:经桡动脉通路的体外评价。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daishiro Abe, Jun-Ichi Koyama, Yoshiki Hanaoka, Takuya Nakamura, Yu Nagai, Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi
{"title":"导管张力试验:经桡动脉通路的体外评价。","authors":"Daishiro Abe, Jun-Ichi Koyama, Yoshiki Hanaoka, Takuya Nakamura, Yu Nagai, Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi","doi":"10.1177/15910199251384074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTransradial access (TRA) has been established for neurointervention; however, complications can occur at the radial access site. Radial artery spasm (RAS) is the most common complication of TRA. Under severe RAS conditions, pulling a catheter may occasionally result in radial artery injury and emergency surgery may be required. There have been no reports on the behavior of entrapped catheters/sheaths when pulled under severe RAS conditions. We conducted tensile tests on guide sheaths and balloon guide catheters to observe their damage in vitro and evaluate their potential to cause vascular injury.MethodsSix types of guide sheaths and balloon guide catheters were used in the test. The catheters were fixed to the testing machine and pulled. We observed how the catheter stretched and fractured. Additionally, a stress-strain curve was obtained from each examination to compare the characteristics of the catheters.ResultsCatheters were damaged in various ways. Some catheters were simply lengthened, whereas others were partially or completely torn. In the evaluation of the stress-strain curves, the slopes of the curves were almost equal among the catheters at the beginning of the test; that is, the hardness was almost the same for each catheter. As the strain increased, each exhibited different behavior.ConclusionCatheters can be damaged in various ways by stretching, which can cause vascular injuries. Neurointerventionists should be aware of possible catheter damage and vascular injury when catheters are entrapped.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251384074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catheter tensile test: An in vitro evaluation for transradial access.\",\"authors\":\"Daishiro Abe, Jun-Ichi Koyama, Yoshiki Hanaoka, Takuya Nakamura, Yu Nagai, Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251384074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeTransradial access (TRA) has been established for neurointervention; however, complications can occur at the radial access site. Radial artery spasm (RAS) is the most common complication of TRA. Under severe RAS conditions, pulling a catheter may occasionally result in radial artery injury and emergency surgery may be required. There have been no reports on the behavior of entrapped catheters/sheaths when pulled under severe RAS conditions. We conducted tensile tests on guide sheaths and balloon guide catheters to observe their damage in vitro and evaluate their potential to cause vascular injury.MethodsSix types of guide sheaths and balloon guide catheters were used in the test. The catheters were fixed to the testing machine and pulled. We observed how the catheter stretched and fractured. Additionally, a stress-strain curve was obtained from each examination to compare the characteristics of the catheters.ResultsCatheters were damaged in various ways. Some catheters were simply lengthened, whereas others were partially or completely torn. In the evaluation of the stress-strain curves, the slopes of the curves were almost equal among the catheters at the beginning of the test; that is, the hardness was almost the same for each catheter. As the strain increased, each exhibited different behavior.ConclusionCatheters can be damaged in various ways by stretching, which can cause vascular injuries. Neurointerventionists should be aware of possible catheter damage and vascular injury when catheters are entrapped.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251384074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251384074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251384074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的经桡骨通路(trans radial access, TRA)已被建立用于神经干预;然而,并发症可发生在桡骨通路部位。桡动脉痉挛(RAS)是TRA最常见的并发症。在严重的RAS情况下,拔管可能偶尔导致桡动脉损伤,可能需要紧急手术。目前还没有关于在严重RAS条件下牵拉时夹住导管/护套行为的报道。我们对导管鞘和球囊导管进行了拉伸试验,观察其体外损伤情况,并评估其致血管损伤的可能性。方法采用6种导套和球囊导管进行试验。将导管固定在试验机上并拉出。我们观察导管是如何拉伸和断裂的。此外,从每次检查中获得应力-应变曲线,以比较导管的特性。结果导管的损伤形式多种多样。一些导管只是简单地延长,而另一些则部分或完全撕裂。在应力-应变曲线评价中,试验开始时各导管的应力-应变曲线斜率基本相等;也就是说,每根导管的硬度几乎相同。随着应变的增加,每一种都表现出不同的行为。结论牵张可使导管发生多种损伤,引起血管损伤。当导管被夹住时,神经介入医师应注意可能的导管损伤和血管损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catheter tensile test: An in vitro evaluation for transradial access.

PurposeTransradial access (TRA) has been established for neurointervention; however, complications can occur at the radial access site. Radial artery spasm (RAS) is the most common complication of TRA. Under severe RAS conditions, pulling a catheter may occasionally result in radial artery injury and emergency surgery may be required. There have been no reports on the behavior of entrapped catheters/sheaths when pulled under severe RAS conditions. We conducted tensile tests on guide sheaths and balloon guide catheters to observe their damage in vitro and evaluate their potential to cause vascular injury.MethodsSix types of guide sheaths and balloon guide catheters were used in the test. The catheters were fixed to the testing machine and pulled. We observed how the catheter stretched and fractured. Additionally, a stress-strain curve was obtained from each examination to compare the characteristics of the catheters.ResultsCatheters were damaged in various ways. Some catheters were simply lengthened, whereas others were partially or completely torn. In the evaluation of the stress-strain curves, the slopes of the curves were almost equal among the catheters at the beginning of the test; that is, the hardness was almost the same for each catheter. As the strain increased, each exhibited different behavior.ConclusionCatheters can be damaged in various ways by stretching, which can cause vascular injuries. Neurointerventionists should be aware of possible catheter damage and vascular injury when catheters are entrapped.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信