家中死亡地点可以作为家中自杀的依据吗?记录关联研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Joh-Jong Huang, Ying-Chen Chi, Chia-Tse Nee, Ying Ching Lee, Ying-Yeh Chen, Tsung-Hsueh Lu
{"title":"家中死亡地点可以作为家中自杀的依据吗?记录关联研究。","authors":"Joh-Jong Huang, Ying-Chen Chi, Chia-Tse Nee, Ying Ching Lee, Ying-Yeh Chen, Tsung-Hsueh Lu","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00609-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate information on where suicides occur; especially in domestic settings, is essential for designing prevention programs. In practice, place of death from death certificates is used as a proxy, though its accuracy is unclear. This study assessed the validity of using death certificate data to determine place of suicide, using linked records from the Suicide Surveillance System in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked mortality data with the Suicide Surveillance System in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, from 2021 to 2023. Using the place of suicide recorded in the surveillance system as the reference standard, we estimated the proportion of suicide deaths in each place-of-death category (home, hospital, and other) that actually occurred at home.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1465 suicide deaths, 965 were successfully linked to the Suicide Surveillance System. The positive predictive value for death at home was high: 99.3% for hanging, 97.8% for charcoal burning, and 100.0% for other poisoning. Many suicides recorded as hospital deaths actually occurred at home, including 79.3% of hanging, 66.7% of charcoal burning, 85.5% of other poisoning, and 71.6% of jumping cases. After adjustment, the estimated proportion of suicides occurring at home was 80.4% for hanging, 68.2% for charcoal burning, 77.9% for other poisoning, 75.0% for jumping from a height, and 60.2% for other methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using death certificates alone underestimates suicides at home. Improved data integration is needed to support more accurate surveillance and better-targeted suicide prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can place of death at home be used as a proxy for suicide at home? A record linkage study.\",\"authors\":\"Joh-Jong Huang, Ying-Chen Chi, Chia-Tse Nee, Ying Ching Lee, Ying-Yeh Chen, Tsung-Hsueh Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40621-025-00609-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate information on where suicides occur; especially in domestic settings, is essential for designing prevention programs. In practice, place of death from death certificates is used as a proxy, though its accuracy is unclear. This study assessed the validity of using death certificate data to determine place of suicide, using linked records from the Suicide Surveillance System in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked mortality data with the Suicide Surveillance System in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, from 2021 to 2023. Using the place of suicide recorded in the surveillance system as the reference standard, we estimated the proportion of suicide deaths in each place-of-death category (home, hospital, and other) that actually occurred at home.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1465 suicide deaths, 965 were successfully linked to the Suicide Surveillance System. The positive predictive value for death at home was high: 99.3% for hanging, 97.8% for charcoal burning, and 100.0% for other poisoning. Many suicides recorded as hospital deaths actually occurred at home, including 79.3% of hanging, 66.7% of charcoal burning, 85.5% of other poisoning, and 71.6% of jumping cases. After adjustment, the estimated proportion of suicides occurring at home was 80.4% for hanging, 68.2% for charcoal burning, 77.9% for other poisoning, 75.0% for jumping from a height, and 60.2% for other methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using death certificates alone underestimates suicides at home. Improved data integration is needed to support more accurate surveillance and better-targeted suicide prevention efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487454/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-025-00609-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-025-00609-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于自杀发生地点的准确信息;特别是在家庭环境中,这对于设计预防方案至关重要。在实践中,死亡证明上的死亡地点被用作替代,尽管其准确性尚不清楚。本研究利用台湾自杀监控系统的连结记录,评估使用死亡证明资料确定自杀地点的有效性。方法:我们将2021年至2023年台湾高雄市自杀监测系统的死亡率数据联系起来。以监控系统中记录的自杀地点为参照标准,估算了各死亡地点类别(家庭、医院和其他)中实际发生在家中的自杀死亡比例。结果:在1465例自杀死亡中,965例成功地与自杀监测系统联系起来。家中死亡的阳性预测值很高:上吊为99.3%,木炭燃烧为97.8%,其他中毒为100.0%。许多被记录为医院死亡的自杀事件实际上发生在家中,包括79.3%的上吊,66.7%的木炭燃烧,85.5%的其他中毒和71.6%的跳楼。经调整后,家中自杀的估计比例为:上吊80.4%、烧炭68.2%、其他中毒77.9%、跳楼75.0%、其他60.2%。结论:单独使用死亡证明低估了家庭自杀。需要改进数据整合,以支持更准确的监测和更有针对性的自杀预防工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can place of death at home be used as a proxy for suicide at home? A record linkage study.

Background: Accurate information on where suicides occur; especially in domestic settings, is essential for designing prevention programs. In practice, place of death from death certificates is used as a proxy, though its accuracy is unclear. This study assessed the validity of using death certificate data to determine place of suicide, using linked records from the Suicide Surveillance System in Taiwan.

Methods: We linked mortality data with the Suicide Surveillance System in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, from 2021 to 2023. Using the place of suicide recorded in the surveillance system as the reference standard, we estimated the proportion of suicide deaths in each place-of-death category (home, hospital, and other) that actually occurred at home.

Results: Among 1465 suicide deaths, 965 were successfully linked to the Suicide Surveillance System. The positive predictive value for death at home was high: 99.3% for hanging, 97.8% for charcoal burning, and 100.0% for other poisoning. Many suicides recorded as hospital deaths actually occurred at home, including 79.3% of hanging, 66.7% of charcoal burning, 85.5% of other poisoning, and 71.6% of jumping cases. After adjustment, the estimated proportion of suicides occurring at home was 80.4% for hanging, 68.2% for charcoal burning, 77.9% for other poisoning, 75.0% for jumping from a height, and 60.2% for other methods.

Conclusions: Using death certificates alone underestimates suicides at home. Improved data integration is needed to support more accurate surveillance and better-targeted suicide prevention efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信