{"title":"治疗家庭成员的伦理挑战:在印度背景下保密和临床决策的案例研究。","authors":"Mohamed Ali Kalathingal, Nazia Edathola Kottasseri, Jasim Uluvan, Shajitha Thekke Veettil","doi":"10.1177/2050313X251380521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This case report explores the ethical complexities faced by physicians when providing medical advice and care to close family members. It focuses on a 29-year-old Indian woman residing in Western Europe who, while visiting family in Kerala, India, was diagnosed with IgA nephropathy during a routine health check. Several family members involved in her care are also practicing physicians, raising significant ethical questions about confidentiality, professional objectivity, and the boundaries of familial care. The case highlights the tension between patient autonomy and informal medical involvement by relatives, especially in a country such as India, where cultural expectations encourage familial responsibility. Although clinical care was efficiently delivered, the situation raised concerns about the formal decision-making process, the lack of clinical documentation, and the absence of established ethical frameworks within the Indian healthcare context. This report emphasizes the need for clearer guidelines and practical tools to help physicians navigate dual-role relationships while upholding confidentiality and clinical integrity. The patient's perspective and the follow-up are discussed, with implications for both policy and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21418,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medical Case Reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"2050313X251380521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical challenges in treating family members: A case study on confidentiality and clinical decision-making in the Indian context.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Ali Kalathingal, Nazia Edathola Kottasseri, Jasim Uluvan, Shajitha Thekke Veettil\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2050313X251380521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This case report explores the ethical complexities faced by physicians when providing medical advice and care to close family members. It focuses on a 29-year-old Indian woman residing in Western Europe who, while visiting family in Kerala, India, was diagnosed with IgA nephropathy during a routine health check. Several family members involved in her care are also practicing physicians, raising significant ethical questions about confidentiality, professional objectivity, and the boundaries of familial care. The case highlights the tension between patient autonomy and informal medical involvement by relatives, especially in a country such as India, where cultural expectations encourage familial responsibility. Although clinical care was efficiently delivered, the situation raised concerns about the formal decision-making process, the lack of clinical documentation, and the absence of established ethical frameworks within the Indian healthcare context. This report emphasizes the need for clearer guidelines and practical tools to help physicians navigate dual-role relationships while upholding confidentiality and clinical integrity. The patient's perspective and the follow-up are discussed, with implications for both policy and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Medical Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"2050313X251380521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477383/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Medical Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X251380521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X251380521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ethical challenges in treating family members: A case study on confidentiality and clinical decision-making in the Indian context.
This case report explores the ethical complexities faced by physicians when providing medical advice and care to close family members. It focuses on a 29-year-old Indian woman residing in Western Europe who, while visiting family in Kerala, India, was diagnosed with IgA nephropathy during a routine health check. Several family members involved in her care are also practicing physicians, raising significant ethical questions about confidentiality, professional objectivity, and the boundaries of familial care. The case highlights the tension between patient autonomy and informal medical involvement by relatives, especially in a country such as India, where cultural expectations encourage familial responsibility. Although clinical care was efficiently delivered, the situation raised concerns about the formal decision-making process, the lack of clinical documentation, and the absence of established ethical frameworks within the Indian healthcare context. This report emphasizes the need for clearer guidelines and practical tools to help physicians navigate dual-role relationships while upholding confidentiality and clinical integrity. The patient's perspective and the follow-up are discussed, with implications for both policy and practice.
期刊介绍:
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports (indexed in PubMed Central) is a peer reviewed, open access journal. It aims to provide a publication home for short case reports and case series, which often do not find a place in traditional primary research journals, but provide key insights into real medical cases that are essential for physicians, and may ultimately help to improve patient outcomes. SAGE Open Medical Case Reports does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers are subject to rigorous peer review and are selected on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication. By virtue of not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, SAGE Open Medical Case Reports facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers, whether within or between disciplines. Case reports can span the full spectrum of medicine across the health sciences in the broadest sense, including: Allergy/Immunology Anaesthesia/Pain Cardiovascular Critical Care/ Emergency Medicine Dentistry Dermatology Diabetes/Endocrinology Epidemiology/Public Health Gastroenterology/Hepatology Geriatrics/Gerontology Haematology Infectious Diseases Mental Health/Psychiatry Nephrology Neurology Nursing Obstetrics/Gynaecology Oncology Ophthalmology Orthopaedics/Rehabilitation/Occupational Therapy Otolaryngology Palliative Medicine Pathology Pharmacoeconomics/health economics Pharmacoepidemiology/Drug safety Psychopharmacology Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology/ Clinical Immunology Sports Medicine Surgery Toxicology Urology Women''s Health.