{"title":"益生菌和炎症性肠病:复发、复发和缓解结果的综合meta分析","authors":"Wei Liu, Shengbo Zhang, Changzheng Dong, Xia Lv, Ximin Zheng, Wei Zhao, Mehrdad Jamali, Ranasadat Abedi, Ahmad Saedisomeolia","doi":"10.1186/s12986-025-01002-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) encompass chronic inflammatory conditions such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. This umbrella meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in reducing relapse, recurrence, and maintaining remission in IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2024 for meta-analyses evaluating probiotics in IBD. A random-effects model calculated pooled effect sizes. The methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots, Egger's and Begg's tests, and corrected by trim-and-fill when appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty meta-analyses including 46 datasets were analyzed. Probiotics significantly reduced relapse risk compared to placebo (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88), but showed no significant effect compared to mesalazine. No consistent benefit was found for remission or recurrence; however, recurrence risk was reduced after correction for publication bias (RR:0.74;95%CI:0.51-0.97, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit with lower probiotic doses (≤ 10¹⁰ Colony-Forming Units/day) and longer supplementation durations (≥ 8 weeks) regarding to relapse rate, although strain-specific effects could not be clarified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Probiotic supplementation appears effective in reducing relapse compared to placebo, but shows no advantage over mesalazine and demonstrates benefit for recurrence only after adjusting for publication bias. These findings highlight a potential role for probiotics in IBD management, but interpretation should be cautious given the high heterogeneity and substantial overlap among included meta-analyses. Further high-quality, non-overlapping meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most effective probiotic regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":19196,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Metabolism","volume":"22 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probiotics and inflammatory bowel disease: an umbrella meta-analysis of relapse, recurrence, and remission outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Liu, Shengbo Zhang, Changzheng Dong, Xia Lv, Ximin Zheng, Wei Zhao, Mehrdad Jamali, Ranasadat Abedi, Ahmad Saedisomeolia\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12986-025-01002-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) encompass chronic inflammatory conditions such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. This umbrella meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in reducing relapse, recurrence, and maintaining remission in IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2024 for meta-analyses evaluating probiotics in IBD. A random-effects model calculated pooled effect sizes. The methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots, Egger's and Begg's tests, and corrected by trim-and-fill when appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty meta-analyses including 46 datasets were analyzed. Probiotics significantly reduced relapse risk compared to placebo (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88), but showed no significant effect compared to mesalazine. No consistent benefit was found for remission or recurrence; however, recurrence risk was reduced after correction for publication bias (RR:0.74;95%CI:0.51-0.97, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit with lower probiotic doses (≤ 10¹⁰ Colony-Forming Units/day) and longer supplementation durations (≥ 8 weeks) regarding to relapse rate, although strain-specific effects could not be clarified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Probiotic supplementation appears effective in reducing relapse compared to placebo, but shows no advantage over mesalazine and demonstrates benefit for recurrence only after adjusting for publication bias. These findings highlight a potential role for probiotics in IBD management, but interpretation should be cautious given the high heterogeneity and substantial overlap among included meta-analyses. Further high-quality, non-overlapping meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most effective probiotic regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486786/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-025-01002-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-025-01002-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)包括慢性炎症性疾病,如溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病。这项综合荟萃分析调查了补充益生菌在减少IBD患者复发、复发和维持缓解方面的疗效。方法:我们系统地检索了PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,检索了截至2024年11月评估IBD益生菌的meta分析。随机效应模型计算合并效应大小。使用AMSTAR 2评估纳入综述的方法学质量。发表偏倚通过漏斗图、Egger’s和Begg’s检验进行评估,并在适当的时候通过补边修正。结果:共分析了20项meta分析,包括46个数据集。与安慰剂相比,益生菌可显著降低复发风险(RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88),但与美沙拉嗪相比无显著效果。在缓解或复发方面没有发现一致的益处;然而,在校正发表偏倚后,复发风险降低(RR:0.74;95%CI:0.51-0.97, P)。结论:与安慰剂相比,补充益生菌在减少复发方面有效,但与美沙拉嗪相比没有优势,只有在校正发表偏倚后才显示出复发的益处。这些发现强调了益生菌在IBD治疗中的潜在作用,但考虑到所纳入的meta分析的高度异质性和大量重叠,解释应谨慎。需要进一步的高质量、无重叠的荟萃分析和随机对照试验来确定最有效的益生菌方案。
Probiotics and inflammatory bowel disease: an umbrella meta-analysis of relapse, recurrence, and remission outcomes.
Background: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) encompass chronic inflammatory conditions such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. This umbrella meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in reducing relapse, recurrence, and maintaining remission in IBD patients.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2024 for meta-analyses evaluating probiotics in IBD. A random-effects model calculated pooled effect sizes. The methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR 2. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots, Egger's and Begg's tests, and corrected by trim-and-fill when appropriate.
Results: Twenty meta-analyses including 46 datasets were analyzed. Probiotics significantly reduced relapse risk compared to placebo (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88), but showed no significant effect compared to mesalazine. No consistent benefit was found for remission or recurrence; however, recurrence risk was reduced after correction for publication bias (RR:0.74;95%CI:0.51-0.97, P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit with lower probiotic doses (≤ 10¹⁰ Colony-Forming Units/day) and longer supplementation durations (≥ 8 weeks) regarding to relapse rate, although strain-specific effects could not be clarified.
Conclusion: Probiotic supplementation appears effective in reducing relapse compared to placebo, but shows no advantage over mesalazine and demonstrates benefit for recurrence only after adjusting for publication bias. These findings highlight a potential role for probiotics in IBD management, but interpretation should be cautious given the high heterogeneity and substantial overlap among included meta-analyses. Further high-quality, non-overlapping meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the most effective probiotic regimens.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition & Metabolism publishes studies with a clear focus on nutrition and metabolism with applications ranging from nutrition needs, exercise physiology, clinical and population studies, as well as the underlying mechanisms in these aspects.
The areas of interest for Nutrition & Metabolism encompass studies in molecular nutrition in the context of obesity, diabetes, lipedemias, metabolic syndrome and exercise physiology. Manuscripts related to molecular, cellular and human metabolism, nutrient sensing and nutrient–gene interactions are also in interest, as are submissions that have employed new and innovative strategies like metabolomics/lipidomics or other omic-based biomarkers to predict nutritional status and metabolic diseases.
Key areas we wish to encourage submissions from include:
-how diet and specific nutrients interact with genes, proteins or metabolites to influence metabolic phenotypes and disease outcomes;
-the role of epigenetic factors and the microbiome in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases and their influence on metabolic responses to diet and food components;
-how diet and other environmental factors affect epigenetics and microbiota; the extent to which genetic and nongenetic factors modify personal metabolic responses to diet and food compositions and the mechanisms involved;
-how specific biologic networks and nutrient sensing mechanisms attribute to metabolic variability.