Marina Mordenti, Leonardo Panzeri, Alice Moroni, Manila Boarini, Marta Calzolari, Francesca Gurioli, Chiara Pollicini, Giulia Rogati, Alberto Leardini, Luca Sangiorgi
{"title":"患者组织在研究活动中的参与:在成骨不全症的临床研究中采取的行动和吸取的教训。","authors":"Marina Mordenti, Leonardo Panzeri, Alice Moroni, Manila Boarini, Marta Calzolari, Francesca Gurioli, Chiara Pollicini, Giulia Rogati, Alberto Leardini, Luca Sangiorgi","doi":"10.1186/s13023-025-03986-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rare diseases are chronic, progressive, and debilitating conditions, affecting 3.5-5.9% of the global population. Clinical research studies are crucial for developing new diagnostic approaches and treatments and for overcoming the lack of awareness and the need of expertise surrounding these diseases. Involving patient organizations in clinical studies is widely considered a promising approach, to overcome barriers and to facilitate research activities. The aim of this paper is to present the actions taken, the relevant results, and the lessons learned from involving a patient organization in shaping, conducting, and disseminating a clinical study on rare patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a context of a clinical study in which patients underwent a comprehensive, fully instrumental gait analysis and an evaluation of specific movement tasks using stereophotogrammetry and wearable sensors, we assessed all the actions taken and the results achieved by the implementation of an original collaborative model between a public institution and a national patient organization. To generalize our collaborative experience, steps and stages of the research process that can benefit the most from the support of a patient organization were identified, experimental protocol drafting, ethic committee approval, patient enrolment, and dissemination. Patients reported positive feedback in a short questionnaire on the use case experience. Moreover, we highlighted the gains and the weaknesses of this approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This experience resulted in several benefits for all the actors involved, strengthening the collaboration between the PO and researchers and fostering a cohesive and cooperative network.</p>","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":"20 1","pages":"495"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involvement of patient organisations in research activities: actions taken and lessons learned in a clinical research study for osteogenesis imperfecta.\",\"authors\":\"Marina Mordenti, Leonardo Panzeri, Alice Moroni, Manila Boarini, Marta Calzolari, Francesca Gurioli, Chiara Pollicini, Giulia Rogati, Alberto Leardini, Luca Sangiorgi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13023-025-03986-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rare diseases are chronic, progressive, and debilitating conditions, affecting 3.5-5.9% of the global population. Clinical research studies are crucial for developing new diagnostic approaches and treatments and for overcoming the lack of awareness and the need of expertise surrounding these diseases. Involving patient organizations in clinical studies is widely considered a promising approach, to overcome barriers and to facilitate research activities. The aim of this paper is to present the actions taken, the relevant results, and the lessons learned from involving a patient organization in shaping, conducting, and disseminating a clinical study on rare patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a context of a clinical study in which patients underwent a comprehensive, fully instrumental gait analysis and an evaluation of specific movement tasks using stereophotogrammetry and wearable sensors, we assessed all the actions taken and the results achieved by the implementation of an original collaborative model between a public institution and a national patient organization. To generalize our collaborative experience, steps and stages of the research process that can benefit the most from the support of a patient organization were identified, experimental protocol drafting, ethic committee approval, patient enrolment, and dissemination. Patients reported positive feedback in a short questionnaire on the use case experience. Moreover, we highlighted the gains and the weaknesses of this approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This experience resulted in several benefits for all the actors involved, strengthening the collaboration between the PO and researchers and fostering a cohesive and cooperative network.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486716/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03986-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03986-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Involvement of patient organisations in research activities: actions taken and lessons learned in a clinical research study for osteogenesis imperfecta.
Background: Rare diseases are chronic, progressive, and debilitating conditions, affecting 3.5-5.9% of the global population. Clinical research studies are crucial for developing new diagnostic approaches and treatments and for overcoming the lack of awareness and the need of expertise surrounding these diseases. Involving patient organizations in clinical studies is widely considered a promising approach, to overcome barriers and to facilitate research activities. The aim of this paper is to present the actions taken, the relevant results, and the lessons learned from involving a patient organization in shaping, conducting, and disseminating a clinical study on rare patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.
Results: In a context of a clinical study in which patients underwent a comprehensive, fully instrumental gait analysis and an evaluation of specific movement tasks using stereophotogrammetry and wearable sensors, we assessed all the actions taken and the results achieved by the implementation of an original collaborative model between a public institution and a national patient organization. To generalize our collaborative experience, steps and stages of the research process that can benefit the most from the support of a patient organization were identified, experimental protocol drafting, ethic committee approval, patient enrolment, and dissemination. Patients reported positive feedback in a short questionnaire on the use case experience. Moreover, we highlighted the gains and the weaknesses of this approach.
Conclusions: This experience resulted in several benefits for all the actors involved, strengthening the collaboration between the PO and researchers and fostering a cohesive and cooperative network.
期刊介绍:
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.