基于人工智能的血液检测设备对急性感染和败血症的诊断和预后的临床验证。

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Oliver Liesenfeld, Sanjay Arora, Tom P Aufderheide, Casey M Clements, Elizabeth DeVos, Miriam Fischer, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Stacey House, Roger L Humphries, Jasreen Kaur Gill, Edward Liu, Sharon E Mace, Larissa May, Edward Michelson, Tiffany M Osborn, Edward Panacek, Richard E Rothman, Wesley H Self, Howard A Smithline, Jay Steingrub, Paul Van Heukelom, Alexandra Weissman, Matthew Wilson, Donna M Wolk, David W Wright, Ljubomir Buturovic, Yehudit Hasin-Brumshtein, Nandita Damaraju, Cici Lu, Joshua R Shak, Natalie N Whitfield, Purvesh Khatri, Timothy E Sweeney, Nathan I Shapiro
{"title":"基于人工智能的血液检测设备对急性感染和败血症的诊断和预后的临床验证。","authors":"Oliver Liesenfeld, Sanjay Arora, Tom P Aufderheide, Casey M Clements, Elizabeth DeVos, Miriam Fischer, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Stacey House, Roger L Humphries, Jasreen Kaur Gill, Edward Liu, Sharon E Mace, Larissa May, Edward Michelson, Tiffany M Osborn, Edward Panacek, Richard E Rothman, Wesley H Self, Howard A Smithline, Jay Steingrub, Paul Van Heukelom, Alexandra Weissman, Matthew Wilson, Donna M Wolk, David W Wright, Ljubomir Buturovic, Yehudit Hasin-Brumshtein, Nandita Damaraju, Cici Lu, Joshua R Shak, Natalie N Whitfield, Purvesh Khatri, Timothy E Sweeney, Nathan I Shapiro","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03933-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lack of reliable diagnostics for the presence, type and severity of infection in patients presenting to emergency departments with non-specific symptoms poses considerable challenges. We developed TriVerity, which uses isothermal amplification of 29 mRNAs and machine learning algorithms on the Myrna instrument to determine likelihoods of bacterial infection, viral infection and need for critical care interventions within 7 days. To validate TriVerity, the SEPSIS-SHIELD study enrolled 1,222 patients with clinically adjudicated infection status and need for critical care intervention within 7 days as endpoints. The TriVerity Bacterial and Viral scores had higher accuracy than C-reactive protein, procalcitonin or white blood cell count for the diagnosis of bacterial infection with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.83, and viral infection (AUROC = 0.91). The TriVerity Severity score had an AUROC of 0.78 for predicting illness severity and allowed reclassification of risk for critical care interventions compared to clinical assessment (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) alone. Each of the three scores had rule-in specificity >92% and rule-out sensitivity >95%. Comparison of antibiotics administration at presentation with post-follow-up adjudication found that TriVerity could potentially reduce false positives and false negatives for inappropriate antibiotics use by 60-70%. Further clinical testing in an interventional setting is needed to prove actionability and clinical benefit of TriVerity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical validation of an AI-based blood testing device for diagnosis and prognosis of acute infection and sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Liesenfeld, Sanjay Arora, Tom P Aufderheide, Casey M Clements, Elizabeth DeVos, Miriam Fischer, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Stacey House, Roger L Humphries, Jasreen Kaur Gill, Edward Liu, Sharon E Mace, Larissa May, Edward Michelson, Tiffany M Osborn, Edward Panacek, Richard E Rothman, Wesley H Self, Howard A Smithline, Jay Steingrub, Paul Van Heukelom, Alexandra Weissman, Matthew Wilson, Donna M Wolk, David W Wright, Ljubomir Buturovic, Yehudit Hasin-Brumshtein, Nandita Damaraju, Cici Lu, Joshua R Shak, Natalie N Whitfield, Purvesh Khatri, Timothy E Sweeney, Nathan I Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03933-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lack of reliable diagnostics for the presence, type and severity of infection in patients presenting to emergency departments with non-specific symptoms poses considerable challenges. We developed TriVerity, which uses isothermal amplification of 29 mRNAs and machine learning algorithms on the Myrna instrument to determine likelihoods of bacterial infection, viral infection and need for critical care interventions within 7 days. To validate TriVerity, the SEPSIS-SHIELD study enrolled 1,222 patients with clinically adjudicated infection status and need for critical care intervention within 7 days as endpoints. The TriVerity Bacterial and Viral scores had higher accuracy than C-reactive protein, procalcitonin or white blood cell count for the diagnosis of bacterial infection with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.83, and viral infection (AUROC = 0.91). The TriVerity Severity score had an AUROC of 0.78 for predicting illness severity and allowed reclassification of risk for critical care interventions compared to clinical assessment (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) alone. Each of the three scores had rule-in specificity >92% and rule-out sensitivity >95%. Comparison of antibiotics administration at presentation with post-follow-up adjudication found that TriVerity could potentially reduce false positives and false negatives for inappropriate antibiotics use by 60-70%. Further clinical testing in an interventional setting is needed to prove actionability and clinical benefit of TriVerity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03933-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03933-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺乏可靠的诊断,感染的存在,类型和严重程度的患者呈现到急诊科的非特异性症状构成了相当大的挑战。我们开发了TriVerity,它在Myrna仪器上使用29种mrna的等温扩增和机器学习算法来确定7天内细菌感染、病毒感染的可能性和重症监护干预的必要性。为了验证TriVerity,败血症- shield研究招募了1222名临床确诊感染状态并在7天内需要重症监护干预的患者作为终点。TriVerity细菌和病毒评分诊断细菌感染的准确率高于c反应蛋白、降钙素原和白细胞计数,其受者工作特征下面积(AUROC)为0.83,病毒感染(AUROC = 0.91)。TriVerity严重性评分预测疾病严重程度的AUROC为0.78,与单独的临床评估(快速序贯器官衰竭评估)相比,可以对危重护理干预进行风险重新分类。三个评分的规则特异性>为92%,排除敏感性>为95%。将就诊时的抗生素使用与随访后的裁决进行比较发现,TriVerity可能会将不适当使用抗生素的假阳性和假阴性减少60-70%。需要在介入环境中进行进一步的临床试验,以证明TriVerity的可操作性和临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical validation of an AI-based blood testing device for diagnosis and prognosis of acute infection and sepsis.

Lack of reliable diagnostics for the presence, type and severity of infection in patients presenting to emergency departments with non-specific symptoms poses considerable challenges. We developed TriVerity, which uses isothermal amplification of 29 mRNAs and machine learning algorithms on the Myrna instrument to determine likelihoods of bacterial infection, viral infection and need for critical care interventions within 7 days. To validate TriVerity, the SEPSIS-SHIELD study enrolled 1,222 patients with clinically adjudicated infection status and need for critical care intervention within 7 days as endpoints. The TriVerity Bacterial and Viral scores had higher accuracy than C-reactive protein, procalcitonin or white blood cell count for the diagnosis of bacterial infection with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.83, and viral infection (AUROC = 0.91). The TriVerity Severity score had an AUROC of 0.78 for predicting illness severity and allowed reclassification of risk for critical care interventions compared to clinical assessment (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) alone. Each of the three scores had rule-in specificity >92% and rule-out sensitivity >95%. Comparison of antibiotics administration at presentation with post-follow-up adjudication found that TriVerity could potentially reduce false positives and false negatives for inappropriate antibiotics use by 60-70%. Further clinical testing in an interventional setting is needed to prove actionability and clinical benefit of TriVerity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信