俄亥俄州多民族难民安置中的孤独感

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Saruna Ghimire, Isha Karmacharya, Aman Shrestha, Ahmed Danquah, Shuayb Jet Jama, Seleshi Asfaw, Surendra Bir Adhikari
{"title":"俄亥俄州多民族难民安置中的孤独感","authors":"Saruna Ghimire, Isha Karmacharya, Aman Shrestha, Ahmed Danquah, Shuayb Jet Jama, Seleshi Asfaw, Surendra Bir Adhikari","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02614-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the prevalence and factors associated with loneliness among five resettled communities in Ohio: Afghan, Bhutanese, Congolese, Ethiopi an/Eritrean, and Somali.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey of 572 participants was conducted with the help of local community organizations. Loneliness was measured using the three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale and categorized into two groups: \"not lonely\" and \"lonely.\" The final analytic sample comprised 458 participants. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze key predictors, including healthcare access, mental and physical health, social support, and resilience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 29% reported loneliness. Participants with regular access to a doctor were 56% less likely to experience loneliness than those without access [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.69], while fair/poor self-rated health tripled the experience (aOR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.42-6.63). Mental health was the strongest predictor, with anxiety increasing the odds of loneliness by over eight times (aOR = 8.43, 95% CI: 4.46-15.93) and depression by more than three times (aOR = 3.53, 95% CI: 1.99-6.26). Experiencing racial discrimination increased the odds of loneliness by 73% (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10-2.74). Low resilience quintupled the odds of loneliness (aOR = 5.07, 95% CI: 2.79-9.20), while low social support doubled such odds (aOR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.04-6.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found a high prevalence of loneliness among adults in resettled communities, which underscores the need to address physical and mental health, healthcare access, and social support. Especially, it is critical to develop and implement culturally tailored interventions to reduce loneliness and improve the well-being of these communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loneliness in Resettlement Among Multi-Ethnic Resettled Refugees in Ohio.\",\"authors\":\"Saruna Ghimire, Isha Karmacharya, Aman Shrestha, Ahmed Danquah, Shuayb Jet Jama, Seleshi Asfaw, Surendra Bir Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-025-02614-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the prevalence and factors associated with loneliness among five resettled communities in Ohio: Afghan, Bhutanese, Congolese, Ethiopi an/Eritrean, and Somali.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey of 572 participants was conducted with the help of local community organizations. Loneliness was measured using the three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale and categorized into two groups: \\\"not lonely\\\" and \\\"lonely.\\\" The final analytic sample comprised 458 participants. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze key predictors, including healthcare access, mental and physical health, social support, and resilience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 29% reported loneliness. Participants with regular access to a doctor were 56% less likely to experience loneliness than those without access [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.69], while fair/poor self-rated health tripled the experience (aOR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.42-6.63). Mental health was the strongest predictor, with anxiety increasing the odds of loneliness by over eight times (aOR = 8.43, 95% CI: 4.46-15.93) and depression by more than three times (aOR = 3.53, 95% CI: 1.99-6.26). Experiencing racial discrimination increased the odds of loneliness by 73% (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10-2.74). Low resilience quintupled the odds of loneliness (aOR = 5.07, 95% CI: 2.79-9.20), while low social support doubled such odds (aOR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.04-6.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found a high prevalence of loneliness among adults in resettled communities, which underscores the need to address physical and mental health, healthcare access, and social support. Especially, it is critical to develop and implement culturally tailored interventions to reduce loneliness and improve the well-being of these communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02614-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02614-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了俄亥俄州五个重新安置社区的孤独感患病率和相关因素:阿富汗人、不丹人、刚果人、埃塞俄比亚人/厄立特里亚人和索马里人。方法:在当地社区组织的帮助下,对572名参与者进行横断面在线调查。孤独感是用加州大学洛杉矶分校的三项孤独量表来测量的,并分为两组:“不孤独”和“孤独”。最终的分析样本包括458名参与者。使用二元逻辑回归分析关键预测因子,包括医疗保健可及性、身心健康、社会支持和复原力。结果:29%的参与者表示感到孤独。定期去看医生的参与者比那些没有机会去看医生的参与者感到孤独的可能性低56%[调整后优势比(aOR) = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.69],而自我评价健康状况良好/不佳的参与者的孤独感增加了两倍(aOR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.42-6.63)。心理健康是最强的预测因子,焦虑使孤独的几率增加8倍以上(aOR = 8.43, 95% CI: 4.46-15.93),抑郁使孤独的几率增加3倍以上(aOR = 3.53, 95% CI: 1.99-6.26)。经历种族歧视会使孤独的几率增加73% (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10-2.74)。低恢复力使孤独的几率增加了五倍(aOR = 5.07, 95% CI: 2.79-9.20),而低社会支持使孤独的几率增加了一倍(aOR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.04-6.03)。结论:研究发现,在被重新安置的社区中,成年人的孤独感非常普遍,这强调了解决身心健康、医疗保健和社会支持问题的必要性。尤其重要的是,制定和实施适合文化的干预措施,以减少孤独感,改善这些社区的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loneliness in Resettlement Among Multi-Ethnic Resettled Refugees in Ohio.

Background: This study assessed the prevalence and factors associated with loneliness among five resettled communities in Ohio: Afghan, Bhutanese, Congolese, Ethiopi an/Eritrean, and Somali.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey of 572 participants was conducted with the help of local community organizations. Loneliness was measured using the three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale and categorized into two groups: "not lonely" and "lonely." The final analytic sample comprised 458 participants. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze key predictors, including healthcare access, mental and physical health, social support, and resilience.

Results: Of the participants, 29% reported loneliness. Participants with regular access to a doctor were 56% less likely to experience loneliness than those without access [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.69], while fair/poor self-rated health tripled the experience (aOR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.42-6.63). Mental health was the strongest predictor, with anxiety increasing the odds of loneliness by over eight times (aOR = 8.43, 95% CI: 4.46-15.93) and depression by more than three times (aOR = 3.53, 95% CI: 1.99-6.26). Experiencing racial discrimination increased the odds of loneliness by 73% (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.10-2.74). Low resilience quintupled the odds of loneliness (aOR = 5.07, 95% CI: 2.79-9.20), while low social support doubled such odds (aOR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.04-6.03).

Conclusion: The study found a high prevalence of loneliness among adults in resettled communities, which underscores the need to address physical and mental health, healthcare access, and social support. Especially, it is critical to develop and implement culturally tailored interventions to reduce loneliness and improve the well-being of these communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信