SLE合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜的临床特点及治疗效果。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Kai Zhang, Peng Zhao, Bo Huang, Yifan Wang, Taoran Bi, Peiliang Gao, Chunyu Wang, Xiaoyan Xing, Naidi Wang, Ruiling Feng, Gong Cheng, Haihong Yao, Yuan An, Yunshan Zhou, Yuebo Jin, Yuhui Li, Zhanguo Li, Jing He
{"title":"SLE合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜的临床特点及治疗效果。","authors":"Kai Zhang, Peng Zhao, Bo Huang, Yifan Wang, Taoran Bi, Peiliang Gao, Chunyu Wang, Xiaoyan Xing, Naidi Wang, Ruiling Feng, Gong Cheng, Haihong Yao, Yuan An, Yunshan Zhou, Yuebo Jin, Yuhui Li, Zhanguo Li, Jing He","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2025-001740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SLE complicated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (SLE-TTP) is a rare but potentially fatal condition. Current studies regarding SLE-TTP are limited to case reports and literature reviews. This study presents a cohort of patients with SLE-TTP and aims to investigate their clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes, as well as to explore the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) maintenance therapy (RMT) for relapse prevention and long-term disease control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with SLE-TTP were retrospectively identified in an SLE cohort. Baseline characteristics, acute-phase treatment responses and long-term outcomes were collected. All patients received RTX-containing induction therapy during the acute phase of TTP. Maintenance therapy was categorised as RMT (regular RTX infusions) or non-RMT (conventional immunosuppressants and/or biologics) regimens. TTP relapse, lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and infection rates were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 33 patients with SLE-TTP, 31 (94%) achieved clinical remission following RTX-containing induction therapy, while 2 died during the acute phase. Fourteen patients (45%) received RMT, and 17 (55%) received non-RMT regimens. During a median follow-up of 22.9 months, TTP relapse occurred in seven (23%) patients: one (7%) in the RMT group and six (35%) in the non-RMT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly longer relapse-free survival with RMT (log-rank p=0.027). All patients receiving RMT achieved LLDAS, compared with 59% of patients in the non-RMT group. Infection rates were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTX-containing induction regimens resulted in high rates of clinical remission in patients with SLE-TTP. RMT was associated with a significantly reduced risk of TTP relapse and superior long-term control of SLE disease activity, without an excess risk of severe infection. These findings support RMT as a potential option for long-term management of SLE-TTP.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical characteristics and treatment response of patients with SLE complicated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Zhang, Peng Zhao, Bo Huang, Yifan Wang, Taoran Bi, Peiliang Gao, Chunyu Wang, Xiaoyan Xing, Naidi Wang, Ruiling Feng, Gong Cheng, Haihong Yao, Yuan An, Yunshan Zhou, Yuebo Jin, Yuhui Li, Zhanguo Li, Jing He\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2025-001740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SLE complicated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (SLE-TTP) is a rare but potentially fatal condition. Current studies regarding SLE-TTP are limited to case reports and literature reviews. This study presents a cohort of patients with SLE-TTP and aims to investigate their clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes, as well as to explore the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) maintenance therapy (RMT) for relapse prevention and long-term disease control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with SLE-TTP were retrospectively identified in an SLE cohort. Baseline characteristics, acute-phase treatment responses and long-term outcomes were collected. All patients received RTX-containing induction therapy during the acute phase of TTP. Maintenance therapy was categorised as RMT (regular RTX infusions) or non-RMT (conventional immunosuppressants and/or biologics) regimens. TTP relapse, lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and infection rates were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 33 patients with SLE-TTP, 31 (94%) achieved clinical remission following RTX-containing induction therapy, while 2 died during the acute phase. Fourteen patients (45%) received RMT, and 17 (55%) received non-RMT regimens. During a median follow-up of 22.9 months, TTP relapse occurred in seven (23%) patients: one (7%) in the RMT group and six (35%) in the non-RMT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly longer relapse-free survival with RMT (log-rank p=0.027). All patients receiving RMT achieved LLDAS, compared with 59% of patients in the non-RMT group. Infection rates were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RTX-containing induction regimens resulted in high rates of clinical remission in patients with SLE-TTP. RMT was associated with a significantly reduced risk of TTP relapse and superior long-term control of SLE disease activity, without an excess risk of severe infection. These findings support RMT as a potential option for long-term management of SLE-TTP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001740\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:SLE合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(SLE- ttp)是一种罕见但潜在致命的疾病。目前关于SLE-TTP的研究仅限于病例报告和文献综述。本研究对slel - ttp患者进行队列研究,旨在探讨其临床特征和治疗结果,并探讨利妥昔单抗(RTX)维持治疗(RMT)预防复发和长期疾病控制的疗效。方法:回顾性分析SLE队列中SLE- ttp患者。收集基线特征、急性期治疗反应和长期结果。所有患者均在TTP急性期接受含rtx诱导治疗。维持治疗分为RMT(常规RTX输注)或非RMT(常规免疫抑制剂和/或生物制剂)方案。比较两组间TTP复发率、狼疮低疾病活动状态(LLDAS)及感染率。结果:33例SLE-TTP患者中,31例(94%)在含rtx诱导治疗后获得临床缓解,2例在急性期死亡。14名患者(45%)接受了RMT治疗,17名患者(55%)接受了非RMT治疗。在22.9个月的中位随访期间,7例(23%)患者发生TTP复发:1例(7%)在RMT组,6例(35%)在非RMT组。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,RMT患者的无复发生存期显著延长(log-rank p=0.027)。所有接受RMT治疗的患者都达到了LLDAS,而非RMT治疗组的患者达到了59%。两组之间的感染率相当。结论:含有rtx的诱导方案可导致SLE-TTP患者的高临床缓解率。RMT与TTP复发风险显著降低和SLE疾病活动的长期控制相关,没有严重感染的额外风险。这些发现支持RMT作为slel - ttp长期治疗的潜在选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical characteristics and treatment response of patients with SLE complicated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Background: SLE complicated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (SLE-TTP) is a rare but potentially fatal condition. Current studies regarding SLE-TTP are limited to case reports and literature reviews. This study presents a cohort of patients with SLE-TTP and aims to investigate their clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes, as well as to explore the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) maintenance therapy (RMT) for relapse prevention and long-term disease control.

Methods: Patients with SLE-TTP were retrospectively identified in an SLE cohort. Baseline characteristics, acute-phase treatment responses and long-term outcomes were collected. All patients received RTX-containing induction therapy during the acute phase of TTP. Maintenance therapy was categorised as RMT (regular RTX infusions) or non-RMT (conventional immunosuppressants and/or biologics) regimens. TTP relapse, lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and infection rates were compared between groups.

Results: Of 33 patients with SLE-TTP, 31 (94%) achieved clinical remission following RTX-containing induction therapy, while 2 died during the acute phase. Fourteen patients (45%) received RMT, and 17 (55%) received non-RMT regimens. During a median follow-up of 22.9 months, TTP relapse occurred in seven (23%) patients: one (7%) in the RMT group and six (35%) in the non-RMT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly longer relapse-free survival with RMT (log-rank p=0.027). All patients receiving RMT achieved LLDAS, compared with 59% of patients in the non-RMT group. Infection rates were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: RTX-containing induction regimens resulted in high rates of clinical remission in patients with SLE-TTP. RMT was associated with a significantly reduced risk of TTP relapse and superior long-term control of SLE disease activity, without an excess risk of severe infection. These findings support RMT as a potential option for long-term management of SLE-TTP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信