Salvatore Mazzeo, Sara Boveri, Elisa Bortolin, Giulia Bruschi, Emanuele Girani, Alessandro Bombaci, Federico Emanuele Pozzi, Maria Vittoria Corbari, Federico Ambrogi, Federica Agosta, Massimo Filippi, Maria Salsone
{"title":"数据驱动的主观认知衰退亚型:神经心理学概况、阿尔茨海默病生物标志物和临床轨迹。","authors":"Salvatore Mazzeo, Sara Boveri, Elisa Bortolin, Giulia Bruschi, Emanuele Girani, Alessandro Bombaci, Federico Emanuele Pozzi, Maria Vittoria Corbari, Federico Ambrogi, Federica Agosta, Massimo Filippi, Maria Salsone","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13418-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is a heterogeneous condition recognized as the earliest manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We hypothesized that the heterogeneity of SCD may be synthesized in distinct subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. For all participants, demographic variables, cognitive measures, APOE genotype, CSF biomarkers, brain MRI, and FDG-PET data were available. Participants underwent follow-up visits every 6 or 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>542 cognitively normal (CN), 346 SCD, and 423 early mild cognitive impairment (E-MCI) individuals were included. A data-driven approach based on cognitive measures identified three SCD clusters (k1, k2, k3) that performed differently in verbal memory (k2 outperformed all the groups and k3 showed the poorest performance, p < 0.001) and in executive function (k1 had the lowest scores, p = 0.006). Regarding CSF biomarkers, k2 exhibited lower p-tau (20.6 ± 9.2 vs. 24.2 ± 13.6, p = 0.03) and k3 had higher Aβ<sub>42</sub> levels (1131.3 ± 379.8 vs. 942.87 ± 355.3, p = 0.01) compared to the E-MCI group, while there were no differences between k1 and E-MCI. Regarding brain FDG-PET, k1 demonstrated reduced uptake compared to CN, k2, and k3 (p < 0.001). During follow-up, k1 exhibited a higher rate of progression to MCI or dementia compared to k2 and k3 (Log-rank χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.18, p = 0.0002) and a steeper decline in general cognition and long-term verbal memory compared to k2.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We proposed a three-subgroup system classification for SCD, reflecting different cognitive profiles and longitudinal trajectories. Classifying individuals with SCD may enhance diagnostic pathways and inform personalized interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 10","pages":"669"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven subtypes of subjective cognitive decline: neuropsychological profiles, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, and clinical trajectories.\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore Mazzeo, Sara Boveri, Elisa Bortolin, Giulia Bruschi, Emanuele Girani, Alessandro Bombaci, Federico Emanuele Pozzi, Maria Vittoria Corbari, Federico Ambrogi, Federica Agosta, Massimo Filippi, Maria Salsone\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13418-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is a heterogeneous condition recognized as the earliest manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We hypothesized that the heterogeneity of SCD may be synthesized in distinct subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. For all participants, demographic variables, cognitive measures, APOE genotype, CSF biomarkers, brain MRI, and FDG-PET data were available. Participants underwent follow-up visits every 6 or 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>542 cognitively normal (CN), 346 SCD, and 423 early mild cognitive impairment (E-MCI) individuals were included. A data-driven approach based on cognitive measures identified three SCD clusters (k1, k2, k3) that performed differently in verbal memory (k2 outperformed all the groups and k3 showed the poorest performance, p < 0.001) and in executive function (k1 had the lowest scores, p = 0.006). Regarding CSF biomarkers, k2 exhibited lower p-tau (20.6 ± 9.2 vs. 24.2 ± 13.6, p = 0.03) and k3 had higher Aβ<sub>42</sub> levels (1131.3 ± 379.8 vs. 942.87 ± 355.3, p = 0.01) compared to the E-MCI group, while there were no differences between k1 and E-MCI. Regarding brain FDG-PET, k1 demonstrated reduced uptake compared to CN, k2, and k3 (p < 0.001). During follow-up, k1 exhibited a higher rate of progression to MCI or dementia compared to k2 and k3 (Log-rank χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.18, p = 0.0002) and a steeper decline in general cognition and long-term verbal memory compared to k2.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We proposed a three-subgroup system classification for SCD, reflecting different cognitive profiles and longitudinal trajectories. Classifying individuals with SCD may enhance diagnostic pathways and inform personalized interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 10\",\"pages\":\"669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13418-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13418-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Data-driven subtypes of subjective cognitive decline: neuropsychological profiles, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, and clinical trajectories.
Objectives: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is a heterogeneous condition recognized as the earliest manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We hypothesized that the heterogeneity of SCD may be synthesized in distinct subtypes.
Methods: We analyzed data from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. For all participants, demographic variables, cognitive measures, APOE genotype, CSF biomarkers, brain MRI, and FDG-PET data were available. Participants underwent follow-up visits every 6 or 12 months.
Results: 542 cognitively normal (CN), 346 SCD, and 423 early mild cognitive impairment (E-MCI) individuals were included. A data-driven approach based on cognitive measures identified three SCD clusters (k1, k2, k3) that performed differently in verbal memory (k2 outperformed all the groups and k3 showed the poorest performance, p < 0.001) and in executive function (k1 had the lowest scores, p = 0.006). Regarding CSF biomarkers, k2 exhibited lower p-tau (20.6 ± 9.2 vs. 24.2 ± 13.6, p = 0.03) and k3 had higher Aβ42 levels (1131.3 ± 379.8 vs. 942.87 ± 355.3, p = 0.01) compared to the E-MCI group, while there were no differences between k1 and E-MCI. Regarding brain FDG-PET, k1 demonstrated reduced uptake compared to CN, k2, and k3 (p < 0.001). During follow-up, k1 exhibited a higher rate of progression to MCI or dementia compared to k2 and k3 (Log-rank χ2 = 18.18, p = 0.0002) and a steeper decline in general cognition and long-term verbal memory compared to k2.
Interpretation: We proposed a three-subgroup system classification for SCD, reflecting different cognitive profiles and longitudinal trajectories. Classifying individuals with SCD may enhance diagnostic pathways and inform personalized interventions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.