Adel Shahnam , Nadia Hitchen , Sathya Manoharan , Thomas John , Linda Mileshkin , Benjamin Solomon , Shahneen Sandhu , Stephen J. Luen , Jayesh Desai , Ben Tran
{"title":"年龄和合并症对转移性实体恶性肿瘤1期试验参与者安全性结果的影响","authors":"Adel Shahnam , Nadia Hitchen , Sathya Manoharan , Thomas John , Linda Mileshkin , Benjamin Solomon , Shahneen Sandhu , Stephen J. Luen , Jayesh Desai , Ben Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The number of phase 1 clinical trials has been increasing globally over the past decade. However, patient recruitment remains skewed towards younger populations with older adults remaining underrepresented, limiting generalizability. Few studies have systematically examined the role of comorbidities as a determinant of safety outcomes in phase 1 trials. Thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes of phase 1 trial participants.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis examined electronic health records of patients aged ≥18 years enrolled in phase 1 trials for metastatic solid malignancies between January 2020 and May 2023. Patients were stratified into two age groups (<70 years vs. ≥70 years). Patients were classified as comorbid if they had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) ≥4, or modified Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mECI) >12. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was also evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between age, comorbidity, and safety outcomes: serious adverse events (SAE), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), dose reductions/interruptions (DR/DI), cessation of treatment due to toxicity (COTT), and grade 3–5 toxicities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 229 patients, of whom 51 (22%) were aged ≥70 years. Among them, 79 (34%) experienced an SAE, 109 (48%) had DR/DI, 34 (15%) had COTT, 17 (7%) had DLT, and 99 (43%) developed grade 3–5 adverse events. Age was not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of adverse safety outcomes. However, patients with ECI ≥4 had significantly higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECI <4 (50% vs. 31%, <em>p</em> = 0.04, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.08–4.44). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECOG 0 (42% vs. 29%, <em>p</em> = 0.06, OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.01–3.05, <em>p</em> = 0.05). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had significantly higher likelihood of grade 3–5 adverse events than those with ECOG 0 (52% vs. 36%, <em>p</em> = 0.03, OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.11–3.23, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Other comorbidity indices were not significantly associated with safety outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Age alone was not associated with safety outcomes in phase 1 clinical trials for metastatic solid malignancies. Instead, comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status were predictors of adverse events in our cohort of patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"16 8","pages":"Article 102721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes in phase 1 trial participants for metastatic solid malignancies\",\"authors\":\"Adel Shahnam , Nadia Hitchen , Sathya Manoharan , Thomas John , Linda Mileshkin , Benjamin Solomon , Shahneen Sandhu , Stephen J. Luen , Jayesh Desai , Ben Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The number of phase 1 clinical trials has been increasing globally over the past decade. However, patient recruitment remains skewed towards younger populations with older adults remaining underrepresented, limiting generalizability. Few studies have systematically examined the role of comorbidities as a determinant of safety outcomes in phase 1 trials. Thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes of phase 1 trial participants.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis examined electronic health records of patients aged ≥18 years enrolled in phase 1 trials for metastatic solid malignancies between January 2020 and May 2023. Patients were stratified into two age groups (<70 years vs. ≥70 years). Patients were classified as comorbid if they had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) ≥4, or modified Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mECI) >12. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was also evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between age, comorbidity, and safety outcomes: serious adverse events (SAE), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), dose reductions/interruptions (DR/DI), cessation of treatment due to toxicity (COTT), and grade 3–5 toxicities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 229 patients, of whom 51 (22%) were aged ≥70 years. Among them, 79 (34%) experienced an SAE, 109 (48%) had DR/DI, 34 (15%) had COTT, 17 (7%) had DLT, and 99 (43%) developed grade 3–5 adverse events. Age was not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of adverse safety outcomes. However, patients with ECI ≥4 had significantly higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECI <4 (50% vs. 31%, <em>p</em> = 0.04, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.08–4.44). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECOG 0 (42% vs. 29%, <em>p</em> = 0.06, OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.01–3.05, <em>p</em> = 0.05). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had significantly higher likelihood of grade 3–5 adverse events than those with ECOG 0 (52% vs. 36%, <em>p</em> = 0.03, OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.11–3.23, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Other comorbidity indices were not significantly associated with safety outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Age alone was not associated with safety outcomes in phase 1 clinical trials for metastatic solid malignancies. Instead, comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status were predictors of adverse events in our cohort of patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 102721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406825005375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406825005375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes in phase 1 trial participants for metastatic solid malignancies
Introduction
The number of phase 1 clinical trials has been increasing globally over the past decade. However, patient recruitment remains skewed towards younger populations with older adults remaining underrepresented, limiting generalizability. Few studies have systematically examined the role of comorbidities as a determinant of safety outcomes in phase 1 trials. Thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes of phase 1 trial participants.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective analysis examined electronic health records of patients aged ≥18 years enrolled in phase 1 trials for metastatic solid malignancies between January 2020 and May 2023. Patients were stratified into two age groups (<70 years vs. ≥70 years). Patients were classified as comorbid if they had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) ≥4, or modified Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mECI) >12. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was also evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between age, comorbidity, and safety outcomes: serious adverse events (SAE), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), dose reductions/interruptions (DR/DI), cessation of treatment due to toxicity (COTT), and grade 3–5 toxicities.
Results
We included 229 patients, of whom 51 (22%) were aged ≥70 years. Among them, 79 (34%) experienced an SAE, 109 (48%) had DR/DI, 34 (15%) had COTT, 17 (7%) had DLT, and 99 (43%) developed grade 3–5 adverse events. Age was not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of adverse safety outcomes. However, patients with ECI ≥4 had significantly higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECI <4 (50% vs. 31%, p = 0.04, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.08–4.44). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECOG 0 (42% vs. 29%, p = 0.06, OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.01–3.05, p = 0.05). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had significantly higher likelihood of grade 3–5 adverse events than those with ECOG 0 (52% vs. 36%, p = 0.03, OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.11–3.23, p = 0.02). Other comorbidity indices were not significantly associated with safety outcomes.
Discussion
Age alone was not associated with safety outcomes in phase 1 clinical trials for metastatic solid malignancies. Instead, comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status were predictors of adverse events in our cohort of patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology.
The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories:
• Original research articles
• Review articles
• Clinical trials
• Education and training articles
• Short communications
• Perspectives
• Meeting reports
• Letters to the Editor.