年龄和合并症对转移性实体恶性肿瘤1期试验参与者安全性结果的影响

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Adel Shahnam , Nadia Hitchen , Sathya Manoharan , Thomas John , Linda Mileshkin , Benjamin Solomon , Shahneen Sandhu , Stephen J. Luen , Jayesh Desai , Ben Tran
{"title":"年龄和合并症对转移性实体恶性肿瘤1期试验参与者安全性结果的影响","authors":"Adel Shahnam ,&nbsp;Nadia Hitchen ,&nbsp;Sathya Manoharan ,&nbsp;Thomas John ,&nbsp;Linda Mileshkin ,&nbsp;Benjamin Solomon ,&nbsp;Shahneen Sandhu ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Luen ,&nbsp;Jayesh Desai ,&nbsp;Ben Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The number of phase 1 clinical trials has been increasing globally over the past decade. However, patient recruitment remains skewed towards younger populations with older adults remaining underrepresented, limiting generalizability. Few studies have systematically examined the role of comorbidities as a determinant of safety outcomes in phase 1 trials. Thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes of phase 1 trial participants.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis examined electronic health records of patients aged ≥18 years enrolled in phase 1 trials for metastatic solid malignancies between January 2020 and May 2023. Patients were stratified into two age groups (&lt;70 years vs. ≥70 years). Patients were classified as comorbid if they had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) ≥4, or modified Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mECI) &gt;12. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was also evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between age, comorbidity, and safety outcomes: serious adverse events (SAE), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), dose reductions/interruptions (DR/DI), cessation of treatment due to toxicity (COTT), and grade 3–5 toxicities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 229 patients, of whom 51 (22%) were aged ≥70 years. Among them, 79 (34%) experienced an SAE, 109 (48%) had DR/DI, 34 (15%) had COTT, 17 (7%) had DLT, and 99 (43%) developed grade 3–5 adverse events. Age was not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of adverse safety outcomes. However, patients with ECI ≥4 had significantly higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECI &lt;4 (50% vs. 31%, <em>p</em> = 0.04, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.08–4.44). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECOG 0 (42% vs. 29%, <em>p</em> = 0.06, OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.01–3.05, <em>p</em> = 0.05). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had significantly higher likelihood of grade 3–5 adverse events than those with ECOG 0 (52% vs. 36%, <em>p</em> = 0.03, OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.11–3.23, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Other comorbidity indices were not significantly associated with safety outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Age alone was not associated with safety outcomes in phase 1 clinical trials for metastatic solid malignancies. Instead, comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status were predictors of adverse events in our cohort of patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"16 8","pages":"Article 102721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes in phase 1 trial participants for metastatic solid malignancies\",\"authors\":\"Adel Shahnam ,&nbsp;Nadia Hitchen ,&nbsp;Sathya Manoharan ,&nbsp;Thomas John ,&nbsp;Linda Mileshkin ,&nbsp;Benjamin Solomon ,&nbsp;Shahneen Sandhu ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Luen ,&nbsp;Jayesh Desai ,&nbsp;Ben Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The number of phase 1 clinical trials has been increasing globally over the past decade. However, patient recruitment remains skewed towards younger populations with older adults remaining underrepresented, limiting generalizability. Few studies have systematically examined the role of comorbidities as a determinant of safety outcomes in phase 1 trials. Thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes of phase 1 trial participants.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis examined electronic health records of patients aged ≥18 years enrolled in phase 1 trials for metastatic solid malignancies between January 2020 and May 2023. Patients were stratified into two age groups (&lt;70 years vs. ≥70 years). Patients were classified as comorbid if they had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) ≥4, or modified Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mECI) &gt;12. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was also evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between age, comorbidity, and safety outcomes: serious adverse events (SAE), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), dose reductions/interruptions (DR/DI), cessation of treatment due to toxicity (COTT), and grade 3–5 toxicities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 229 patients, of whom 51 (22%) were aged ≥70 years. Among them, 79 (34%) experienced an SAE, 109 (48%) had DR/DI, 34 (15%) had COTT, 17 (7%) had DLT, and 99 (43%) developed grade 3–5 adverse events. Age was not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of adverse safety outcomes. However, patients with ECI ≥4 had significantly higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECI &lt;4 (50% vs. 31%, <em>p</em> = 0.04, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.08–4.44). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECOG 0 (42% vs. 29%, <em>p</em> = 0.06, OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.01–3.05, <em>p</em> = 0.05). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had significantly higher likelihood of grade 3–5 adverse events than those with ECOG 0 (52% vs. 36%, <em>p</em> = 0.03, OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.11–3.23, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Other comorbidity indices were not significantly associated with safety outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Age alone was not associated with safety outcomes in phase 1 clinical trials for metastatic solid malignancies. Instead, comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status were predictors of adverse events in our cohort of patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 102721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406825005375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406825005375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在过去的十年中,全球i期临床试验的数量一直在增加。然而,患者招募仍然倾向于年轻人群,老年人仍然不足,限制了普遍性。很少有研究系统地考察了合并症在1期临床试验中作为安全性结果决定因素的作用。因此,我们的目的是调查年龄和合并症对1期试验参与者安全性结果的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性分析检查了2020年1月至2023年5月期间参加转移性实体恶性肿瘤i期试验的年龄≥18岁患者的电子健康记录。患者分为两个年龄组(12岁。并对东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)的工作状态进行评价。Logistic回归模型评估了年龄、合并症和安全性结局之间的关联:严重不良事件(SAE)、剂量限制性毒性(DLT)、剂量减少/中断(DR/DI)、因毒性而停止治疗(COTT)和3-5级毒性。结果:我们纳入229例患者,其中51例(22%)年龄≥70岁。其中79例(34%)发生SAE, 109例(48%)发生DR/DI, 34例(15%)发生COTT, 17例(7%)发生DLT, 99例(43%)发生3-5级不良事件。年龄与不良安全结果的高可能性无显著相关。然而,ECI≥4的患者发生SAE的可能性明显高于ECI患者。讨论:在转移性实体恶性肿瘤的1期临床试验中,年龄本身与安全性结果无关。相反,在我们的患者队列中,合并症负担和ECOG表现状态是不良事件的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes in phase 1 trial participants for metastatic solid malignancies

Introduction

The number of phase 1 clinical trials has been increasing globally over the past decade. However, patient recruitment remains skewed towards younger populations with older adults remaining underrepresented, limiting generalizability. Few studies have systematically examined the role of comorbidities as a determinant of safety outcomes in phase 1 trials. Thus, we aimed to investigate the impact of age and comorbidity on safety outcomes of phase 1 trial participants.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective analysis examined electronic health records of patients aged ≥18 years enrolled in phase 1 trials for metastatic solid malignancies between January 2020 and May 2023. Patients were stratified into two age groups (<70 years vs. ≥70 years). Patients were classified as comorbid if they had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) ≥4, or modified Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mECI) >12. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was also evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between age, comorbidity, and safety outcomes: serious adverse events (SAE), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), dose reductions/interruptions (DR/DI), cessation of treatment due to toxicity (COTT), and grade 3–5 toxicities.

Results

We included 229 patients, of whom 51 (22%) were aged ≥70 years. Among them, 79 (34%) experienced an SAE, 109 (48%) had DR/DI, 34 (15%) had COTT, 17 (7%) had DLT, and 99 (43%) developed grade 3–5 adverse events. Age was not significantly associated with a higher likelihood of adverse safety outcomes. However, patients with ECI ≥4 had significantly higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECI <4 (50% vs. 31%, p = 0.04, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.08–4.44). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had higher likelihood of SAE than those with ECOG 0 (42% vs. 29%, p = 0.06, OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.01–3.05, p = 0.05). Patients with ECOG ≥1 had significantly higher likelihood of grade 3–5 adverse events than those with ECOG 0 (52% vs. 36%, p = 0.03, OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.11–3.23, p = 0.02). Other comorbidity indices were not significantly associated with safety outcomes.

Discussion

Age alone was not associated with safety outcomes in phase 1 clinical trials for metastatic solid malignancies. Instead, comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status were predictors of adverse events in our cohort of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信