心血管外科患者血液管理现状:来自领先中心调查的见解。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Arthur W Bracey, Sean G Yates, Abe DeAnda, Pratik Kothary, Ravi Joshi, Matthew A Warner, Linda J Shore-Lesserson
{"title":"心血管外科患者血液管理现状:来自领先中心调查的见解。","authors":"Arthur W Bracey, Sean G Yates, Abe DeAnda, Pratik Kothary, Ravi Joshi, Matthew A Warner, Linda J Shore-Lesserson","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the state of patient blood management (PBM) practice in leading US cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey tool addressing PBM program structure and PBM program operations was deployed. The survey also incorporated practice in managing certain case scenarios.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The US News and World Reports 2024 top 25 cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Only 29% of sites had full-time equivalents committed to PBM. The approach to informed consent varied among sites. Most sites (54%) obtained informed consent to cover the entire hospital stay. Consent for non-emergent transfusion was obtained at 21% of sites. Preadmission anemia screening was deployed for longer than 2 weeks in 29% of sites. While many anesthesia techniques associated with blood conservation were used by the majority (e.g., acute normovolemic hemodilution 92%, retrograde autologous priming 95%), simple steps like adjusting cardiopulmonary (CPB) circuits for patient size were only offered at 43% of sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key features of well-designed PBM programs were not found in many of the surveyed programs. This audit suggests an opportunity for PBM growth across cardiovascular surgery programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current State of Patient Blood Management in Cardiovascular Surgery: Insights from a Survey of Leading Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Arthur W Bracey, Sean G Yates, Abe DeAnda, Pratik Kothary, Ravi Joshi, Matthew A Warner, Linda J Shore-Lesserson\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the state of patient blood management (PBM) practice in leading US cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey tool addressing PBM program structure and PBM program operations was deployed. The survey also incorporated practice in managing certain case scenarios.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The US News and World Reports 2024 top 25 cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Only 29% of sites had full-time equivalents committed to PBM. The approach to informed consent varied among sites. Most sites (54%) obtained informed consent to cover the entire hospital stay. Consent for non-emergent transfusion was obtained at 21% of sites. Preadmission anemia screening was deployed for longer than 2 weeks in 29% of sites. While many anesthesia techniques associated with blood conservation were used by the majority (e.g., acute normovolemic hemodilution 92%, retrograde autologous priming 95%), simple steps like adjusting cardiopulmonary (CPB) circuits for patient size were only offered at 43% of sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key features of well-designed PBM programs were not found in many of the surveyed programs. This audit suggests an opportunity for PBM growth across cardiovascular surgery programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解美国主要心脏外科中心的患者血液管理(PBM)实践状况。设计:部署了一个解决PBM程序结构和PBM程序操作的调查工具。调查还纳入了管理某些情况的实践。工作地点:心脏外科中心。干预:没有。参与者:2024年美国新闻与世界报道前25名心脏手术中心。测量和主要结果:只有29%的站点有全职的PBM。各网站的知情同意方式各不相同。大多数医院(54%)在整个住院期间获得知情同意。21%的医院同意非紧急输血。入院前贫血筛查在29%的地点部署超过2周。虽然许多与血液保护相关的麻醉技术被大多数使用(例如,急性等容血液稀释92%,逆行自体启动95%),但仅在43%的部位提供简单的步骤,如根据患者大小调整心肺(CPB)回路。结论:在许多被调查的项目中没有发现设计良好的PBM项目的关键特征。这项审计表明,在心血管外科项目中,PBM有机会增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current State of Patient Blood Management in Cardiovascular Surgery: Insights from a Survey of Leading Centers.

Objective: To determine the state of patient blood management (PBM) practice in leading US cardiac surgery centers.

Design: A survey tool addressing PBM program structure and PBM program operations was deployed. The survey also incorporated practice in managing certain case scenarios.

Setting: Cardiac surgery centers.

Intervention: None.

Participants: The US News and World Reports 2024 top 25 cardiac surgery centers.

Measurements and main results: Only 29% of sites had full-time equivalents committed to PBM. The approach to informed consent varied among sites. Most sites (54%) obtained informed consent to cover the entire hospital stay. Consent for non-emergent transfusion was obtained at 21% of sites. Preadmission anemia screening was deployed for longer than 2 weeks in 29% of sites. While many anesthesia techniques associated with blood conservation were used by the majority (e.g., acute normovolemic hemodilution 92%, retrograde autologous priming 95%), simple steps like adjusting cardiopulmonary (CPB) circuits for patient size were only offered at 43% of sites.

Conclusions: Key features of well-designed PBM programs were not found in many of the surveyed programs. This audit suggests an opportunity for PBM growth across cardiovascular surgery programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信