Arthur W Bracey, Sean G Yates, Abe DeAnda, Pratik Kothary, Ravi Joshi, Matthew A Warner, Linda J Shore-Lesserson
{"title":"心血管外科患者血液管理现状:来自领先中心调查的见解。","authors":"Arthur W Bracey, Sean G Yates, Abe DeAnda, Pratik Kothary, Ravi Joshi, Matthew A Warner, Linda J Shore-Lesserson","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the state of patient blood management (PBM) practice in leading US cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey tool addressing PBM program structure and PBM program operations was deployed. The survey also incorporated practice in managing certain case scenarios.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The US News and World Reports 2024 top 25 cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Only 29% of sites had full-time equivalents committed to PBM. The approach to informed consent varied among sites. Most sites (54%) obtained informed consent to cover the entire hospital stay. Consent for non-emergent transfusion was obtained at 21% of sites. Preadmission anemia screening was deployed for longer than 2 weeks in 29% of sites. While many anesthesia techniques associated with blood conservation were used by the majority (e.g., acute normovolemic hemodilution 92%, retrograde autologous priming 95%), simple steps like adjusting cardiopulmonary (CPB) circuits for patient size were only offered at 43% of sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key features of well-designed PBM programs were not found in many of the surveyed programs. This audit suggests an opportunity for PBM growth across cardiovascular surgery programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current State of Patient Blood Management in Cardiovascular Surgery: Insights from a Survey of Leading Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Arthur W Bracey, Sean G Yates, Abe DeAnda, Pratik Kothary, Ravi Joshi, Matthew A Warner, Linda J Shore-Lesserson\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the state of patient blood management (PBM) practice in leading US cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey tool addressing PBM program structure and PBM program operations was deployed. The survey also incorporated practice in managing certain case scenarios.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The US News and World Reports 2024 top 25 cardiac surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Only 29% of sites had full-time equivalents committed to PBM. The approach to informed consent varied among sites. Most sites (54%) obtained informed consent to cover the entire hospital stay. Consent for non-emergent transfusion was obtained at 21% of sites. Preadmission anemia screening was deployed for longer than 2 weeks in 29% of sites. While many anesthesia techniques associated with blood conservation were used by the majority (e.g., acute normovolemic hemodilution 92%, retrograde autologous priming 95%), simple steps like adjusting cardiopulmonary (CPB) circuits for patient size were only offered at 43% of sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key features of well-designed PBM programs were not found in many of the surveyed programs. This audit suggests an opportunity for PBM growth across cardiovascular surgery programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current State of Patient Blood Management in Cardiovascular Surgery: Insights from a Survey of Leading Centers.
Objective: To determine the state of patient blood management (PBM) practice in leading US cardiac surgery centers.
Design: A survey tool addressing PBM program structure and PBM program operations was deployed. The survey also incorporated practice in managing certain case scenarios.
Setting: Cardiac surgery centers.
Intervention: None.
Participants: The US News and World Reports 2024 top 25 cardiac surgery centers.
Measurements and main results: Only 29% of sites had full-time equivalents committed to PBM. The approach to informed consent varied among sites. Most sites (54%) obtained informed consent to cover the entire hospital stay. Consent for non-emergent transfusion was obtained at 21% of sites. Preadmission anemia screening was deployed for longer than 2 weeks in 29% of sites. While many anesthesia techniques associated with blood conservation were used by the majority (e.g., acute normovolemic hemodilution 92%, retrograde autologous priming 95%), simple steps like adjusting cardiopulmonary (CPB) circuits for patient size were only offered at 43% of sites.
Conclusions: Key features of well-designed PBM programs were not found in many of the surveyed programs. This audit suggests an opportunity for PBM growth across cardiovascular surgery programs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.