Laura P Cohen, Charlotte Paquette, Michelle Vassilopoulos, Ashley Tringale, Kathryn E Sheppard, Christine Ko, Lana Tsao, Safia Chatur, Claire Lin, Aferdita Spahillari, Yuxi Liu, James L Januzzi
{"title":"一个专门的指导医学治疗诊所的扩展结果。","authors":"Laura P Cohen, Charlotte Paquette, Michelle Vassilopoulos, Ashley Tringale, Kathryn E Sheppard, Christine Ko, Lana Tsao, Safia Chatur, Claire Lin, Aferdita Spahillari, Yuxi Liu, James L Januzzi","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) care in general cardiology environments is suboptimal. A dedicated GDMT clinic was expanded to include individuals with HF across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Referred individuals were seen by advanced practice providers until maximally tolerated therapy was achieved. Achievement of optimal GDMT was evaluated and compared to patients from usual care matched in a 1:2 fashion. Key prognostic HF indicators were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) age of 92 GDMT-eligible clinic participants was 66.5 (15.4) years, 25 (27.2%) were female;18 (19.6%) had LVEF ≥50%. From baseline to follow-up visit (12.9 weeks), the number of patients eligible for optimal GDMT with LVEF <50% increased from 12.0% to 91.3% (p<0.001); among eligible individuals with LVEF ≥50%, optimal GDMT increased from 5.6% to 77.8% (p=0.001). There was an increase in the proportion on optimal GDMT at ≥50% target dose (1.1% to 50.0%) and at target dose (0.0% to 30.4%). These changes were substantially greater than in the matched cohort of usual care patients. Among GDMT patients, significant improvements were observed in symptoms, NT-proBNP and important echocardiographic measurements. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall and Clinical Summary Scores both significantly increased by 8 points (p=0.01) and 6-minute walk distance increased by 37 meters (p=0.03). GDMT administration was safe and well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful implementation of GDMT in a dedicated clinic embedded within a general cardiology practice was well-tolerated and effective to improve key outcomes across the entire spectrum of LVEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanded Results from a Dedicated Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Laura P Cohen, Charlotte Paquette, Michelle Vassilopoulos, Ashley Tringale, Kathryn E Sheppard, Christine Ko, Lana Tsao, Safia Chatur, Claire Lin, Aferdita Spahillari, Yuxi Liu, James L Januzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.09.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) care in general cardiology environments is suboptimal. A dedicated GDMT clinic was expanded to include individuals with HF across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Referred individuals were seen by advanced practice providers until maximally tolerated therapy was achieved. Achievement of optimal GDMT was evaluated and compared to patients from usual care matched in a 1:2 fashion. Key prognostic HF indicators were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) age of 92 GDMT-eligible clinic participants was 66.5 (15.4) years, 25 (27.2%) were female;18 (19.6%) had LVEF ≥50%. From baseline to follow-up visit (12.9 weeks), the number of patients eligible for optimal GDMT with LVEF <50% increased from 12.0% to 91.3% (p<0.001); among eligible individuals with LVEF ≥50%, optimal GDMT increased from 5.6% to 77.8% (p=0.001). There was an increase in the proportion on optimal GDMT at ≥50% target dose (1.1% to 50.0%) and at target dose (0.0% to 30.4%). These changes were substantially greater than in the matched cohort of usual care patients. Among GDMT patients, significant improvements were observed in symptoms, NT-proBNP and important echocardiographic measurements. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall and Clinical Summary Scores both significantly increased by 8 points (p=0.01) and 6-minute walk distance increased by 37 meters (p=0.03). GDMT administration was safe and well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful implementation of GDMT in a dedicated clinic embedded within a general cardiology practice was well-tolerated and effective to improve key outcomes across the entire spectrum of LVEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.09.019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.09.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expanded Results from a Dedicated Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Clinic.
Background: Implementation of guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) care in general cardiology environments is suboptimal. A dedicated GDMT clinic was expanded to include individuals with HF across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Methods: Referred individuals were seen by advanced practice providers until maximally tolerated therapy was achieved. Achievement of optimal GDMT was evaluated and compared to patients from usual care matched in a 1:2 fashion. Key prognostic HF indicators were assessed.
Results: The mean (SD) age of 92 GDMT-eligible clinic participants was 66.5 (15.4) years, 25 (27.2%) were female;18 (19.6%) had LVEF ≥50%. From baseline to follow-up visit (12.9 weeks), the number of patients eligible for optimal GDMT with LVEF <50% increased from 12.0% to 91.3% (p<0.001); among eligible individuals with LVEF ≥50%, optimal GDMT increased from 5.6% to 77.8% (p=0.001). There was an increase in the proportion on optimal GDMT at ≥50% target dose (1.1% to 50.0%) and at target dose (0.0% to 30.4%). These changes were substantially greater than in the matched cohort of usual care patients. Among GDMT patients, significant improvements were observed in symptoms, NT-proBNP and important echocardiographic measurements. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall and Clinical Summary Scores both significantly increased by 8 points (p=0.01) and 6-minute walk distance increased by 37 meters (p=0.03). GDMT administration was safe and well tolerated.
Conclusions: Successful implementation of GDMT in a dedicated clinic embedded within a general cardiology practice was well-tolerated and effective to improve key outcomes across the entire spectrum of LVEF.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.