影响微生物服务使用的因素:埃塞俄比亚公立医院的横断面研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kibrewossen Kiflu Akililu, Workagegnehu Tarekegn, Zerihun Shimelis Kasa, Michael Solomon Tessema, Biniyam Tedla Mamo, Yemane Berhane
{"title":"影响微生物服务使用的因素:埃塞俄比亚公立医院的横断面研究。","authors":"Kibrewossen Kiflu Akililu, Workagegnehu Tarekegn, Zerihun Shimelis Kasa, Michael Solomon Tessema, Biniyam Tedla Mamo, Yemane Berhane","doi":"10.1186/s41043-025-01081-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Empiric management of infectious diseases is prevalent in low-resource settings. This has resulted in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. In Ethiopia, there is scarce evidence on the extent of use and factors influencing the utilization of microbiologic services in routine clinical practice. This study aims to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 clinicians from eight public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. After obtaining informed consent, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. The collected data was cleaned and analyzed using SPSS 27, with binomial and multinomial regression tests performed to measure statistical association between identified factors and microbiologic service utilization.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Two-hundred-twelve (53.0%) of the 400 clinicians had limited knowledge on the availability and/or types of microbiologic services provided in their facilities. Only fifty-nine (14.8%) consistently sent out culture tests when clinically indicated. The primary reasons for clinicians' reluctance to prescribe culture tests included perceived gaps in availability, turnaround time, completeness of antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) panels, and lack of concordance with clinical pictures. Besides their overall impact on diagnostic stewardship, these gaps have also left a negative impression on prescribers. Discordance with clinical profile (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09, 0.88, P = 0.03), and incomplete AST panels (AOR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.94, P = 0.04) have negatively affected the perception interviewed clinicians had on reliability of services provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight key areas for targeted intervention in the knowledge, attitudes, and use of microbiology services in public healthcare, largely due to concerns about service quality and timeliness. The determinant factors identified present opportunities to improve laboratory services and better support clinicians in their practice. Despite the critical role of culture and sensitivity tests in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR), their use remains limited. This underscores the urgent need for coordinated action to strengthen microbiology services as a key strategy in the fight against AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":"44 1","pages":"341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing the use of microbiology services: A cross-sectional study in Ethiopian public hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Kibrewossen Kiflu Akililu, Workagegnehu Tarekegn, Zerihun Shimelis Kasa, Michael Solomon Tessema, Biniyam Tedla Mamo, Yemane Berhane\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41043-025-01081-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Empiric management of infectious diseases is prevalent in low-resource settings. This has resulted in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. In Ethiopia, there is scarce evidence on the extent of use and factors influencing the utilization of microbiologic services in routine clinical practice. This study aims to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 clinicians from eight public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. After obtaining informed consent, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. The collected data was cleaned and analyzed using SPSS 27, with binomial and multinomial regression tests performed to measure statistical association between identified factors and microbiologic service utilization.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Two-hundred-twelve (53.0%) of the 400 clinicians had limited knowledge on the availability and/or types of microbiologic services provided in their facilities. Only fifty-nine (14.8%) consistently sent out culture tests when clinically indicated. The primary reasons for clinicians' reluctance to prescribe culture tests included perceived gaps in availability, turnaround time, completeness of antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) panels, and lack of concordance with clinical pictures. Besides their overall impact on diagnostic stewardship, these gaps have also left a negative impression on prescribers. Discordance with clinical profile (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09, 0.88, P = 0.03), and incomplete AST panels (AOR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.94, P = 0.04) have negatively affected the perception interviewed clinicians had on reliability of services provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight key areas for targeted intervention in the knowledge, attitudes, and use of microbiology services in public healthcare, largely due to concerns about service quality and timeliness. The determinant factors identified present opportunities to improve laboratory services and better support clinicians in their practice. Despite the critical role of culture and sensitivity tests in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR), their use remains limited. This underscores the urgent need for coordinated action to strengthen microbiology services as a key strategy in the fight against AMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-01081-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-01081-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传染病的经验性管理在低资源环境中很普遍。这导致了抗菌素耐药性的出现和传播。在埃塞俄比亚,关于日常临床实践中使用微生物学服务的程度和影响因素的证据很少。本研究旨在解决这一差距。方法:对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴8所公立医院的400名临床医生进行横断面研究。在获得知情同意后,参与者完成了一份自我管理的问卷。收集的数据使用SPSS 27进行清理和分析,并进行二项和多项回归检验,以衡量鉴定因素与微生物服务利用率之间的统计相关性。结果:400名临床医生中有212名(53.0%)对其机构提供的微生物学服务的可获得性和/或类型了解有限。只有59家(14.8%)在临床需要时坚持进行培养试验。临床医生不愿开培养试验的主要原因包括可获得性、周转时间、抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)面板的完整性以及与临床图片缺乏一致性。除了对诊断管理的总体影响外,这些差距也给开处方者留下了负面印象。与临床资料的不一致(AOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09, 0.88, P = 0.03)和不完整的AST面板(AOR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.94, P = 0.04)对受访临床医生对所提供服务可靠性的看法产生了负面影响。结论:研究结果突出了在公共卫生中微生物服务的知识、态度和使用方面需要有针对性干预的关键领域,主要是由于对服务质量和及时性的关注。决定因素确定了目前的机会,以改善实验室服务和更好地支持临床医生在他们的做法。尽管培养和敏感性试验在对抗抗菌素耐药性(AMR)方面发挥着关键作用,但它们的使用仍然有限。这突出表明,迫切需要采取协调行动,加强微生物学服务,将其作为抗击抗生素耐药性的一项关键战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors influencing the use of microbiology services: A cross-sectional study in Ethiopian public hospitals.

Factors influencing the use of microbiology services: A cross-sectional study in Ethiopian public hospitals.

Factors influencing the use of microbiology services: A cross-sectional study in Ethiopian public hospitals.

Background: Empiric management of infectious diseases is prevalent in low-resource settings. This has resulted in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. In Ethiopia, there is scarce evidence on the extent of use and factors influencing the utilization of microbiologic services in routine clinical practice. This study aims to address this gap.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 clinicians from eight public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. After obtaining informed consent, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. The collected data was cleaned and analyzed using SPSS 27, with binomial and multinomial regression tests performed to measure statistical association between identified factors and microbiologic service utilization.

Result: Two-hundred-twelve (53.0%) of the 400 clinicians had limited knowledge on the availability and/or types of microbiologic services provided in their facilities. Only fifty-nine (14.8%) consistently sent out culture tests when clinically indicated. The primary reasons for clinicians' reluctance to prescribe culture tests included perceived gaps in availability, turnaround time, completeness of antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) panels, and lack of concordance with clinical pictures. Besides their overall impact on diagnostic stewardship, these gaps have also left a negative impression on prescribers. Discordance with clinical profile (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09, 0.88, P = 0.03), and incomplete AST panels (AOR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.94, P = 0.04) have negatively affected the perception interviewed clinicians had on reliability of services provided.

Conclusion: The findings highlight key areas for targeted intervention in the knowledge, attitudes, and use of microbiology services in public healthcare, largely due to concerns about service quality and timeliness. The determinant factors identified present opportunities to improve laboratory services and better support clinicians in their practice. Despite the critical role of culture and sensitivity tests in combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR), their use remains limited. This underscores the urgent need for coordinated action to strengthen microbiology services as a key strategy in the fight against AMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信