开发和验证用于重症监护病房获得性弱点早期预测的机器学习模型。

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Felipe Kenji Nakano, Nathalie Van Aerde, Grégoire Coppens, Ilse Vanhorebeek, Celine Vens, Greet Van den Berghe, Fabian Güiza Grandas
{"title":"开发和验证用于重症监护病房获得性弱点早期预测的机器学习模型。","authors":"Felipe Kenji Nakano, Nathalie Van Aerde, Grégoire Coppens, Ilse Vanhorebeek, Celine Vens, Greet Van den Berghe, Fabian Güiza Grandas","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00810-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of potential high cost and high need patients on the ICU may assist in the development of targeted protocols, which allows proper resource utilization and initialization of preventive care. Weakness acquired in the ICU developed within the first week is an independent predictor of both short and long-term adverse outcomes, nonetheless early prediction is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for ICU acquired-weakness (ICU-AW), using data readily available within the first 24 h of ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the EPaNIC trial (NCT00512122, N = 4640) who were assessed for muscle weakness at day 9 (IQR 8-13), after ICU-admission, using the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum. Patients are diagnosed with ICU-AW if their MRC is higher than 48. The final subset contains N = 600. Our models were internally validated using 100 repetitions of fivefold cross validation. We compared three predictive models: (i) a random forest and (ii) a logistic regression model built using descriptors available at day 1, (iii) a random forest using only APACHE II as a descriptor. Both random forests contain 150 trees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The training set comprised 600 patients where the incidence of ICU-AW was 38.6% (232/600). The AUROC of the random forest with all descriptors and the logistic regression were 76% and 74%, respectively. The random forest (RF) achieved a specificity of 62% and a sensitivity 79%, whereas the logistic regression yielded 69% and 68%, respectively. The RF identified APACHE II, creatinine, SOFA PaO2/FiO2, bilirubin, BMI, age, glycemia upon admission, morning glycemia and sepsis as the most relevant descriptors. Lastly, the RF also presented very good calibration and clinical usefulness for a wide range of risk thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models, especially random forests, can be used to predict if patients are at risk of developing ICU-AW, using data available within 24 h of admission. This tool allows prognostication early in an adult general critically ill patient population, with the potential to detect high cost and high need patients who benefit from different levels of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a machine learning model for early prediction of intensive care unit acquired weakness.\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Kenji Nakano, Nathalie Van Aerde, Grégoire Coppens, Ilse Vanhorebeek, Celine Vens, Greet Van den Berghe, Fabian Güiza Grandas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-025-00810-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of potential high cost and high need patients on the ICU may assist in the development of targeted protocols, which allows proper resource utilization and initialization of preventive care. Weakness acquired in the ICU developed within the first week is an independent predictor of both short and long-term adverse outcomes, nonetheless early prediction is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for ICU acquired-weakness (ICU-AW), using data readily available within the first 24 h of ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the EPaNIC trial (NCT00512122, N = 4640) who were assessed for muscle weakness at day 9 (IQR 8-13), after ICU-admission, using the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum. Patients are diagnosed with ICU-AW if their MRC is higher than 48. The final subset contains N = 600. Our models were internally validated using 100 repetitions of fivefold cross validation. We compared three predictive models: (i) a random forest and (ii) a logistic regression model built using descriptors available at day 1, (iii) a random forest using only APACHE II as a descriptor. Both random forests contain 150 trees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The training set comprised 600 patients where the incidence of ICU-AW was 38.6% (232/600). The AUROC of the random forest with all descriptors and the logistic regression were 76% and 74%, respectively. The random forest (RF) achieved a specificity of 62% and a sensitivity 79%, whereas the logistic regression yielded 69% and 68%, respectively. The RF identified APACHE II, creatinine, SOFA PaO2/FiO2, bilirubin, BMI, age, glycemia upon admission, morning glycemia and sepsis as the most relevant descriptors. Lastly, the RF also presented very good calibration and clinical usefulness for a wide range of risk thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models, especially random forests, can be used to predict if patients are at risk of developing ICU-AW, using data available within 24 h of admission. This tool allows prognostication early in an adult general critically ill patient population, with the potential to detect high cost and high need patients who benefit from different levels of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484466/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00810-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00810-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期识别ICU潜在的高成本和高需求患者可能有助于制定有针对性的方案,从而允许适当的资源利用和预防性护理的初始化。在ICU第一周内出现的虚弱是短期和长期不良结果的独立预测因素,尽管早期预测具有挑战性。我们的目标是开发和验证ICU获得性弱点(ICU- aw)的机器学习模型,使用ICU入院前24小时内可获得的数据。方法:来自EPaNIC试验(NCT00512122, N = 4640)的患者在icu入院后第9天(IQR 8-13)评估肌肉无力,使用医学研究委员会(MRC) sum。如果MRC高于48,则诊断为ICU-AW。最后的子集包含N = 600。我们的模型使用100次重复的五重交叉验证进行内部验证。我们比较了三种预测模型:(i)随机森林和(ii)使用第一天可用的描述符构建的逻辑回归模型,(iii)仅使用APACHE ii作为描述符的随机森林。两个随机森林都包含150棵树。结果:纳入600例患者,其中ICU-AW发生率为38.6%(232/600)。随机森林与所有描述符的AUROC分别为76%和74%。随机森林(RF)的特异性为62%,敏感性为79%,而逻辑回归分别为69%和68%。RF确定APACHE II、肌酐、SOFA PaO2/FiO2、胆红素、BMI、年龄、入院时血糖、晨间血糖和败血症是最相关的描述符。最后,RF在大范围的风险阈值范围内也表现出非常好的校准和临床实用性。结论:机器学习模型,特别是随机森林,可用于预测患者是否有发生ICU-AW的风险,使用入院24小时内可获得的数据。该工具允许对成年一般危重患者群体进行早期预测,有可能发现从不同水平的护理中受益的高成本和高需求患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a machine learning model for early prediction of intensive care unit acquired weakness.

Background: Early identification of potential high cost and high need patients on the ICU may assist in the development of targeted protocols, which allows proper resource utilization and initialization of preventive care. Weakness acquired in the ICU developed within the first week is an independent predictor of both short and long-term adverse outcomes, nonetheless early prediction is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for ICU acquired-weakness (ICU-AW), using data readily available within the first 24 h of ICU admission.

Methods: Patients from the EPaNIC trial (NCT00512122, N = 4640) who were assessed for muscle weakness at day 9 (IQR 8-13), after ICU-admission, using the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum. Patients are diagnosed with ICU-AW if their MRC is higher than 48. The final subset contains N = 600. Our models were internally validated using 100 repetitions of fivefold cross validation. We compared three predictive models: (i) a random forest and (ii) a logistic regression model built using descriptors available at day 1, (iii) a random forest using only APACHE II as a descriptor. Both random forests contain 150 trees.

Results: The training set comprised 600 patients where the incidence of ICU-AW was 38.6% (232/600). The AUROC of the random forest with all descriptors and the logistic regression were 76% and 74%, respectively. The random forest (RF) achieved a specificity of 62% and a sensitivity 79%, whereas the logistic regression yielded 69% and 68%, respectively. The RF identified APACHE II, creatinine, SOFA PaO2/FiO2, bilirubin, BMI, age, glycemia upon admission, morning glycemia and sepsis as the most relevant descriptors. Lastly, the RF also presented very good calibration and clinical usefulness for a wide range of risk thresholds.

Conclusions: Machine learning models, especially random forests, can be used to predict if patients are at risk of developing ICU-AW, using data available within 24 h of admission. This tool allows prognostication early in an adult general critically ill patient population, with the potential to detect high cost and high need patients who benefit from different levels of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信