泰国三级医院产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率和危险因素:一项10年回顾性队列研究

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Usana Unpikool, Apiwat Jongjakapun, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chompilas Chongsomchai
{"title":"泰国三级医院产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率和危险因素:一项10年回顾性队列研究","authors":"Usana Unpikool, Apiwat Jongjakapun, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chompilas Chongsomchai","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06301-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a severe complication of vaginal delivery leading to short- and long-term consequences affecting women's physical and psychological health. This study is aimed at evaluating the incidence and risk factors of OASI at a tertiary care centre over the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included all singleton primiparous and multiparous women who delivered vaginally between 2014 and 2023. Women giving birth at < 24 weeks and whose child weighed < 500 g at birth, or with incomplete records, were excluded. Key maternal and obstetric factors were extracted and analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9956 women, the overall incidence of OASI was 9.4% (third-degree 8.7% and fourth-degree 0.7%). The incidence of OASI declined from 9.8% to 6.1% in the past decade, coinciding with a reduction in episiotomy rates. Multivariate analysis identified forceps extraction (aOR 6.15, 95% CI 3.66-10.33), prolonged second stage of labour (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 2.00-3.05), labour augmentation (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.38-1.89), deliveries performed by a faculty member (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.51) and every 100-g increase in neonatal birthweight (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.11) as significant risk factors. Delivery without an episiotomy was a protective factor (aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high incidence of OASI at our institution highlights the impact of obstetric practices. The findings reinforce the need for restrictive episiotomy policies and targeted strategies to mitigate modifiable risk factors associated with OASI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Thailand: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Usana Unpikool, Apiwat Jongjakapun, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chompilas Chongsomchai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-025-06301-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a severe complication of vaginal delivery leading to short- and long-term consequences affecting women's physical and psychological health. This study is aimed at evaluating the incidence and risk factors of OASI at a tertiary care centre over the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included all singleton primiparous and multiparous women who delivered vaginally between 2014 and 2023. Women giving birth at < 24 weeks and whose child weighed < 500 g at birth, or with incomplete records, were excluded. Key maternal and obstetric factors were extracted and analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9956 women, the overall incidence of OASI was 9.4% (third-degree 8.7% and fourth-degree 0.7%). The incidence of OASI declined from 9.8% to 6.1% in the past decade, coinciding with a reduction in episiotomy rates. Multivariate analysis identified forceps extraction (aOR 6.15, 95% CI 3.66-10.33), prolonged second stage of labour (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 2.00-3.05), labour augmentation (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.38-1.89), deliveries performed by a faculty member (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.51) and every 100-g increase in neonatal birthweight (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.11) as significant risk factors. Delivery without an episiotomy was a protective factor (aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high incidence of OASI at our institution highlights the impact of obstetric practices. The findings reinforce the need for restrictive episiotomy policies and targeted strategies to mitigate modifiable risk factors associated with OASI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06301-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06301-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言和假设:产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)是阴道分娩的一种严重并发症,可导致影响妇女身心健康的短期和长期后果。本研究旨在评估过去十年在三级保健中心的OASI发病率和危险因素。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入2014年至2023年间顺产的所有单胎初产妇和多胎产妇。结果:在9956名妇女中,OASI的总发病率为9.4%(三度8.7%,四度0.7%)。在过去的十年中,OASI的发病率从9.8%下降到6.1%,同时外阴切开术的发生率也在下降。多因素分析发现,拔钳(aOR 6.15, 95% CI 3.66-10.33)、第二产程延长(aOR 2.47, 95% CI 2.00-3.05)、助产(aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.38-1.89)、由医护人员接生(aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.51)和新生儿出生体重每增加100 g (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.11)是显著的危险因素。分娩时未行会阴切开术是一个保护因素(aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.56)。结论:OASI在我院的高发突出了产科实践的影响。研究结果强调需要限制性外阴切开术政策和有针对性的策略来减轻与OASI相关的可改变风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Thailand: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction and hypothesis: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a severe complication of vaginal delivery leading to short- and long-term consequences affecting women's physical and psychological health. This study is aimed at evaluating the incidence and risk factors of OASI at a tertiary care centre over the past decade.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all singleton primiparous and multiparous women who delivered vaginally between 2014 and 2023. Women giving birth at < 24 weeks and whose child weighed < 500 g at birth, or with incomplete records, were excluded. Key maternal and obstetric factors were extracted and analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Among 9956 women, the overall incidence of OASI was 9.4% (third-degree 8.7% and fourth-degree 0.7%). The incidence of OASI declined from 9.8% to 6.1% in the past decade, coinciding with a reduction in episiotomy rates. Multivariate analysis identified forceps extraction (aOR 6.15, 95% CI 3.66-10.33), prolonged second stage of labour (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 2.00-3.05), labour augmentation (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.38-1.89), deliveries performed by a faculty member (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.51) and every 100-g increase in neonatal birthweight (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.11) as significant risk factors. Delivery without an episiotomy was a protective factor (aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.56).

Conclusions: The high incidence of OASI at our institution highlights the impact of obstetric practices. The findings reinforce the need for restrictive episiotomy policies and targeted strategies to mitigate modifiable risk factors associated with OASI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信