Josette Mouawad, James French, Farid Meybodi, Kirsty Stuart, Tim Wang, Jeremy Hsu, Elisabeth Elder
{"title":"保留乳头乳房切除术与保留乳房手术后的乳房感觉:一项混合方法的研究。","authors":"Josette Mouawad, James French, Farid Meybodi, Kirsty Stuart, Tim Wang, Jeremy Hsu, Elisabeth Elder","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) allow for preservation of the breast or nipple-areolar complex (NAC). However, this does not guarantee retained sensation in these regions. The prevalence of altered post-operative sensation and its importance to patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to determine the prevalence of breast and NAC sensation loss in NSM and BCS; to assess its importance to patients; and to compare these outcomes between NSM and BCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BREAST-Q Sensation Module and four study-specific questions were sent to NSM or BCS patients at the Westmead Breast Cancer Institute. Comparisons were made between NSM versus BCS, implant-based versus tissue-based NSM reconstruction, BCS with versus without a formal mammaplasty, and treatment with radiotherapy versus without. Semi-structured interviews were also held.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78.8 % and 79.3 % of women experienced breast and/or NAC sensation change, respectively (n = 174). 69.9 % and 44.6 % of NSM patients retained varying levels of breast and NAC sensation, respectively (n = 83). 58.4 % and 60.5 % of BCS patients encountered breast and NAC sensation decrease, respectively (n = 91). Interviews (n = 34) showed that preserved sensation was sometimes of an altered quality and involved neuropathic symptoms. BREAST-Q Sensation scores were worse for NSM than for BCS. NSM reconstruction type did not impact outcomes. NSM patients with radiotherapy had worse BREAST-Q Symptoms scores than those without. BCS mammaplasty status did not influence outcomes, except for patient-reported NAC sensation. Sensation was important to 79.8 % of respondents. NAC sensation was more important to NSM than to BCS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Altered sensation is prevalent and significant to both NSM and BCS patients. Future research relating these findings to intraoperative techniques is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 12","pages":"110477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast sensation following nipple-sparing mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Josette Mouawad, James French, Farid Meybodi, Kirsty Stuart, Tim Wang, Jeremy Hsu, Elisabeth Elder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) allow for preservation of the breast or nipple-areolar complex (NAC). However, this does not guarantee retained sensation in these regions. The prevalence of altered post-operative sensation and its importance to patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to determine the prevalence of breast and NAC sensation loss in NSM and BCS; to assess its importance to patients; and to compare these outcomes between NSM and BCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BREAST-Q Sensation Module and four study-specific questions were sent to NSM or BCS patients at the Westmead Breast Cancer Institute. Comparisons were made between NSM versus BCS, implant-based versus tissue-based NSM reconstruction, BCS with versus without a formal mammaplasty, and treatment with radiotherapy versus without. Semi-structured interviews were also held.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78.8 % and 79.3 % of women experienced breast and/or NAC sensation change, respectively (n = 174). 69.9 % and 44.6 % of NSM patients retained varying levels of breast and NAC sensation, respectively (n = 83). 58.4 % and 60.5 % of BCS patients encountered breast and NAC sensation decrease, respectively (n = 91). Interviews (n = 34) showed that preserved sensation was sometimes of an altered quality and involved neuropathic symptoms. BREAST-Q Sensation scores were worse for NSM than for BCS. NSM reconstruction type did not impact outcomes. NSM patients with radiotherapy had worse BREAST-Q Symptoms scores than those without. BCS mammaplasty status did not influence outcomes, except for patient-reported NAC sensation. Sensation was important to 79.8 % of respondents. NAC sensation was more important to NSM than to BCS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Altered sensation is prevalent and significant to both NSM and BCS patients. Future research relating these findings to intraoperative techniques is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":\"51 12\",\"pages\":\"110477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110477\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast sensation following nipple-sparing mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery: a mixed-methods study.
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) allow for preservation of the breast or nipple-areolar complex (NAC). However, this does not guarantee retained sensation in these regions. The prevalence of altered post-operative sensation and its importance to patients remains unclear.
Aims: This study aims to determine the prevalence of breast and NAC sensation loss in NSM and BCS; to assess its importance to patients; and to compare these outcomes between NSM and BCS.
Methods: The BREAST-Q Sensation Module and four study-specific questions were sent to NSM or BCS patients at the Westmead Breast Cancer Institute. Comparisons were made between NSM versus BCS, implant-based versus tissue-based NSM reconstruction, BCS with versus without a formal mammaplasty, and treatment with radiotherapy versus without. Semi-structured interviews were also held.
Results: 78.8 % and 79.3 % of women experienced breast and/or NAC sensation change, respectively (n = 174). 69.9 % and 44.6 % of NSM patients retained varying levels of breast and NAC sensation, respectively (n = 83). 58.4 % and 60.5 % of BCS patients encountered breast and NAC sensation decrease, respectively (n = 91). Interviews (n = 34) showed that preserved sensation was sometimes of an altered quality and involved neuropathic symptoms. BREAST-Q Sensation scores were worse for NSM than for BCS. NSM reconstruction type did not impact outcomes. NSM patients with radiotherapy had worse BREAST-Q Symptoms scores than those without. BCS mammaplasty status did not influence outcomes, except for patient-reported NAC sensation. Sensation was important to 79.8 % of respondents. NAC sensation was more important to NSM than to BCS patients.
Conclusion: Altered sensation is prevalent and significant to both NSM and BCS patients. Future research relating these findings to intraoperative techniques is required.
期刊介绍:
JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery.
The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.