揭示质子泵抑制剂在胃食管反流中失效的机制:食管酸敏感性的作用。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jerry D Gardner, George Triadafilopoulos
{"title":"揭示质子泵抑制剂在胃食管反流中失效的机制:食管酸敏感性的作用。","authors":"Jerry D Gardner, George Triadafilopoulos","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09450-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For unclear reasons, up to 50% of subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease have an inadequate symptomatic response to treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. Our primary objective was to examine esophageal acid in subjects who experienced heartburn following a standard meal that failed to respond to a proton pump inhibitor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a previous randomized crossover trial of proton pump inhibitors in 27 subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease and baseline esophageal pH < 4 for more than 10% of a 24-h recording. Esophageal pH and heartburn severity were measured over 3 h following a standard meal at baseline and after omeprazole.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relationships between heartburn severity and esophageal acid were identified using the quadrant method. Twelve subjects had high values for heartburn severity with omeprazole, indicating a failed response; 75% of these subjects had low esophageal acid reflecting esophageal hyperalgesia or a cause other than esophageal acid. In subjects with high esophageal acid that failed to improve with omeprazole, heartburn severity improved with omeprazole in 57%, reflecting esophageal hypoalgesia or silent esophageal reflux.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure of heartburn to respond to omeprazole was common in subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease who exhibited high baseline esophageal acid exposure and most of these failures were associated with low esophageal acid.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering the Mechanisms of Failure of Proton Pump Inhibitors in GERD: The Role of Esophageal Acid Sensitivity.\",\"authors\":\"Jerry D Gardner, George Triadafilopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-025-09450-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For unclear reasons, up to 50% of subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease have an inadequate symptomatic response to treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. Our primary objective was to examine esophageal acid in subjects who experienced heartburn following a standard meal that failed to respond to a proton pump inhibitor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a previous randomized crossover trial of proton pump inhibitors in 27 subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease and baseline esophageal pH < 4 for more than 10% of a 24-h recording. Esophageal pH and heartburn severity were measured over 3 h following a standard meal at baseline and after omeprazole.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relationships between heartburn severity and esophageal acid were identified using the quadrant method. Twelve subjects had high values for heartburn severity with omeprazole, indicating a failed response; 75% of these subjects had low esophageal acid reflecting esophageal hyperalgesia or a cause other than esophageal acid. In subjects with high esophageal acid that failed to improve with omeprazole, heartburn severity improved with omeprazole in 57%, reflecting esophageal hypoalgesia or silent esophageal reflux.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure of heartburn to respond to omeprazole was common in subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease who exhibited high baseline esophageal acid exposure and most of these failures were associated with low esophageal acid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09450-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09450-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于不明原因,高达50%的胃食管反流病患者对质子泵抑制剂治疗的症状反应不足。我们的主要目的是检查在质子泵抑制剂无效的标准膳食后发生胃灼热的受试者的食道酸。方法:我们分析了先前在27名胃食管反流病患者中质子泵抑制剂的随机交叉试验数据和基线食管pH值。结果:胃灼热严重程度与食管酸之间的关系使用象限法确定。12名受试者使用奥美拉唑后胃灼热严重程度较高,表明治疗失败;75%的受试者有低食酸,反映食道痛觉过敏或其他原因。在食道酸高但奥美拉唑未能改善的受试者中,57%的胃灼热严重程度奥美拉唑改善,反映了食管疼痛减退或无症状食管反流。结论:奥美拉唑对胃食管反流疾病患者的胃灼热反应失败是常见的,这些患者表现出高基线食酸暴露,大多数失败与低食酸有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncovering the Mechanisms of Failure of Proton Pump Inhibitors in GERD: The Role of Esophageal Acid Sensitivity.

Purpose: For unclear reasons, up to 50% of subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease have an inadequate symptomatic response to treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. Our primary objective was to examine esophageal acid in subjects who experienced heartburn following a standard meal that failed to respond to a proton pump inhibitor.

Methods: We analyzed data from a previous randomized crossover trial of proton pump inhibitors in 27 subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease and baseline esophageal pH < 4 for more than 10% of a 24-h recording. Esophageal pH and heartburn severity were measured over 3 h following a standard meal at baseline and after omeprazole.

Results: Relationships between heartburn severity and esophageal acid were identified using the quadrant method. Twelve subjects had high values for heartburn severity with omeprazole, indicating a failed response; 75% of these subjects had low esophageal acid reflecting esophageal hyperalgesia or a cause other than esophageal acid. In subjects with high esophageal acid that failed to improve with omeprazole, heartburn severity improved with omeprazole in 57%, reflecting esophageal hypoalgesia or silent esophageal reflux.

Conclusions: Failure of heartburn to respond to omeprazole was common in subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease who exhibited high baseline esophageal acid exposure and most of these failures were associated with low esophageal acid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信