Carmine Valenza, Julian D Etessami, Elisabetta Munzone, Gabriella Pravettoni, Giuseppe Curigliano, Dario Trapani
{"title":"使用辅助LHRH激动剂监测激素受体阳性乳腺癌绝经前妇女血清雌二醇。","authors":"Carmine Valenza, Julian D Etessami, Elisabetta Munzone, Gabriella Pravettoni, Giuseppe Curigliano, Dario Trapani","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the current evidence and inform clinical guidance on the implications of incomplete ovarian function suppression (OFS), the utility of serum estradiol (E2) monitoring, and appropriate management strategies in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)-based therapy for OFS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A universally accepted definition of incomplete OFS is currently lacking. Although biologically it is plausible that incomplete OFS may compromise the efficacy of endocrine therapy, its actual impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Currently, the reliability of E2 monitoring is limited by considerable variability in assay methods and reference ranges, raising concerns about its analytical validity. Notably, in a recent international survey of 205 oncologists managing patients with eBC, 43% reported routinely and 27% occasionally assessing E2 levels in premenopausal patients treated with LHRHa, suggesting inconsistent clinical practice. Standard immunoassays were the most frequently used (65%). However, interpretation of E2 values and subsequent management decisions varied widely, highlighting the absence of standardized clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although not currently supported by high-level evidence, serum E2 monitoring is widely adopted in clinical practice. Prospective studies and evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Emerging strategies to overcome incomplete OFS include LHRH antagonists (e.g., degarelix) and oral SERDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring serum estradiol in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer on adjuvant LHRH agonists.\",\"authors\":\"Carmine Valenza, Julian D Etessami, Elisabetta Munzone, Gabriella Pravettoni, Giuseppe Curigliano, Dario Trapani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the current evidence and inform clinical guidance on the implications of incomplete ovarian function suppression (OFS), the utility of serum estradiol (E2) monitoring, and appropriate management strategies in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)-based therapy for OFS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A universally accepted definition of incomplete OFS is currently lacking. Although biologically it is plausible that incomplete OFS may compromise the efficacy of endocrine therapy, its actual impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Currently, the reliability of E2 monitoring is limited by considerable variability in assay methods and reference ranges, raising concerns about its analytical validity. Notably, in a recent international survey of 205 oncologists managing patients with eBC, 43% reported routinely and 27% occasionally assessing E2 levels in premenopausal patients treated with LHRHa, suggesting inconsistent clinical practice. Standard immunoassays were the most frequently used (65%). However, interpretation of E2 values and subsequent management decisions varied widely, highlighting the absence of standardized clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although not currently supported by high-level evidence, serum E2 monitoring is widely adopted in clinical practice. Prospective studies and evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Emerging strategies to overcome incomplete OFS include LHRH antagonists (e.g., degarelix) and oral SERDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001191\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monitoring serum estradiol in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer on adjuvant LHRH agonists.
Purpose of review: To review the current evidence and inform clinical guidance on the implications of incomplete ovarian function suppression (OFS), the utility of serum estradiol (E2) monitoring, and appropriate management strategies in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)-based therapy for OFS.
Recent findings: A universally accepted definition of incomplete OFS is currently lacking. Although biologically it is plausible that incomplete OFS may compromise the efficacy of endocrine therapy, its actual impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Currently, the reliability of E2 monitoring is limited by considerable variability in assay methods and reference ranges, raising concerns about its analytical validity. Notably, in a recent international survey of 205 oncologists managing patients with eBC, 43% reported routinely and 27% occasionally assessing E2 levels in premenopausal patients treated with LHRHa, suggesting inconsistent clinical practice. Standard immunoassays were the most frequently used (65%). However, interpretation of E2 values and subsequent management decisions varied widely, highlighting the absence of standardized clinical guidelines.
Summary: Although not currently supported by high-level evidence, serum E2 monitoring is widely adopted in clinical practice. Prospective studies and evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Emerging strategies to overcome incomplete OFS include LHRH antagonists (e.g., degarelix) and oral SERDs.
期刊介绍:
With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.