使用辅助LHRH激动剂监测激素受体阳性乳腺癌绝经前妇女血清雌二醇。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Carmine Valenza, Julian D Etessami, Elisabetta Munzone, Gabriella Pravettoni, Giuseppe Curigliano, Dario Trapani
{"title":"使用辅助LHRH激动剂监测激素受体阳性乳腺癌绝经前妇女血清雌二醇。","authors":"Carmine Valenza, Julian D Etessami, Elisabetta Munzone, Gabriella Pravettoni, Giuseppe Curigliano, Dario Trapani","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the current evidence and inform clinical guidance on the implications of incomplete ovarian function suppression (OFS), the utility of serum estradiol (E2) monitoring, and appropriate management strategies in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)-based therapy for OFS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A universally accepted definition of incomplete OFS is currently lacking. Although biologically it is plausible that incomplete OFS may compromise the efficacy of endocrine therapy, its actual impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Currently, the reliability of E2 monitoring is limited by considerable variability in assay methods and reference ranges, raising concerns about its analytical validity. Notably, in a recent international survey of 205 oncologists managing patients with eBC, 43% reported routinely and 27% occasionally assessing E2 levels in premenopausal patients treated with LHRHa, suggesting inconsistent clinical practice. Standard immunoassays were the most frequently used (65%). However, interpretation of E2 values and subsequent management decisions varied widely, highlighting the absence of standardized clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although not currently supported by high-level evidence, serum E2 monitoring is widely adopted in clinical practice. Prospective studies and evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Emerging strategies to overcome incomplete OFS include LHRH antagonists (e.g., degarelix) and oral SERDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring serum estradiol in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer on adjuvant LHRH agonists.\",\"authors\":\"Carmine Valenza, Julian D Etessami, Elisabetta Munzone, Gabriella Pravettoni, Giuseppe Curigliano, Dario Trapani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the current evidence and inform clinical guidance on the implications of incomplete ovarian function suppression (OFS), the utility of serum estradiol (E2) monitoring, and appropriate management strategies in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)-based therapy for OFS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A universally accepted definition of incomplete OFS is currently lacking. Although biologically it is plausible that incomplete OFS may compromise the efficacy of endocrine therapy, its actual impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Currently, the reliability of E2 monitoring is limited by considerable variability in assay methods and reference ranges, raising concerns about its analytical validity. Notably, in a recent international survey of 205 oncologists managing patients with eBC, 43% reported routinely and 27% occasionally assessing E2 levels in premenopausal patients treated with LHRHa, suggesting inconsistent clinical practice. Standard immunoassays were the most frequently used (65%). However, interpretation of E2 values and subsequent management decisions varied widely, highlighting the absence of standardized clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Although not currently supported by high-level evidence, serum E2 monitoring is widely adopted in clinical practice. Prospective studies and evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Emerging strategies to overcome incomplete OFS include LHRH antagonists (e.g., degarelix) and oral SERDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001191\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:回顾目前的证据,并为临床指导不完全卵巢功能抑制(OFS)的意义,血清雌二醇(E2)监测的实用性,以及绝经前早期乳腺癌(eBC)妇女接受促黄体生成素释放激素激动剂(LHRHa)辅助治疗OFS的适当管理策略。最近的发现:目前缺乏一个普遍接受的不完全OFS的定义。虽然从生物学角度来看,不完全OFS可能会影响内分泌治疗的疗效,但其对临床结果的实际影响尚不清楚。目前,E2监测的可靠性受到分析方法和参考范围相当大的变化的限制,引起了对其分析有效性的关注。值得注意的是,在最近对205名治疗eBC患者的肿瘤学家进行的一项国际调查中,43%的人报告在接受LHRHa治疗的绝经前患者中定期评估E2水平,27%的人偶尔评估E2水平,这表明临床实践不一致。标准免疫测定法是最常用的(65%)。然而,E2值的解释和随后的管理决策差异很大,这突出了缺乏标准化的临床指南。摘要:虽然目前没有高水平的证据支持,血清E2监测在临床实践中被广泛采用。迫切需要前瞻性研究和基于证据的建议。克服不完全OFS的新策略包括LHRH拮抗剂(如degarelix)和口服serd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring serum estradiol in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer on adjuvant LHRH agonists.

Purpose of review: To review the current evidence and inform clinical guidance on the implications of incomplete ovarian function suppression (OFS), the utility of serum estradiol (E2) monitoring, and appropriate management strategies in premenopausal women with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving adjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)-based therapy for OFS.

Recent findings: A universally accepted definition of incomplete OFS is currently lacking. Although biologically it is plausible that incomplete OFS may compromise the efficacy of endocrine therapy, its actual impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Currently, the reliability of E2 monitoring is limited by considerable variability in assay methods and reference ranges, raising concerns about its analytical validity. Notably, in a recent international survey of 205 oncologists managing patients with eBC, 43% reported routinely and 27% occasionally assessing E2 levels in premenopausal patients treated with LHRHa, suggesting inconsistent clinical practice. Standard immunoassays were the most frequently used (65%). However, interpretation of E2 values and subsequent management decisions varied widely, highlighting the absence of standardized clinical guidelines.

Summary: Although not currently supported by high-level evidence, serum E2 monitoring is widely adopted in clinical practice. Prospective studies and evidence-based recommendations are urgently needed. Emerging strategies to overcome incomplete OFS include LHRH antagonists (e.g., degarelix) and oral SERDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信